On Fri, January 13, 2006 10:32 am, Stut wrote:
>>However, his rant does present a real issue. Forcing people to use
>> "real"
>>email addresses exposes them to SPAM and abuse. I would suggest, if
>>possible and resources permit, that some sort of
>> aliasing/registration
>>system be deployed where
Stut wrote:
> Mark wrote:
>
>>Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Dear Pop Mihai Sergiu,
>>>
>>>By sending this email you (again) posted to a public mailing list which
>>>is archived at multiple places, of which really few are under our
>>>control. There would be no point in removing your message from
Stut wrote:
> Mark wrote:
>
OK, here's the deal. Even if every email address was randomized
(stupid) it still does not sole the issue of someone sending it to
lists. Even randomized "anonymous" email addresses wind up going back
to you, however it puts more load on a server in the process.
RT
Mark wrote:
Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
Dear Pop Mihai Sergiu,
By sending this email you (again) posted to a public mailing list which
is archived at multiple places, of which really few are under our
control. There would be no point in removing your message from our
archives, as it is also posted
Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
> Dear Pop Mihai Sergiu,
>
> By sending this email you (again) posted to a public mailing list which
> is archived at multiple places, of which really few are under our
> control. There would be no point in removing your message from our
> archives, as it is also posted to an
Dear Pop Mihai Sergiu,
By sending this email you (again) posted to a public mailing list which
is archived at multiple places, of which really few are under our
control. There would be no point in removing your message from our
archives, as it is also posted to an unknown number of other archives
6 matches
Mail list logo
