Re: [PHP] Re: Moving to php

Cool.. Weird.. I've used PHP since 4.1.0, on windows ME/Apache 1.3, using streams, sockets, w32api, gd, classes, printers and more, never ran into any other problems that w32api and bcompiler combined with Zend stuff.. :s -- // DvDmanDT MSN: dvdmandt¤hotmail.com Mail: dvdmandt¤telia.com #

Re: [PHP] Re: Moving to php

DvDmanDT wrote: Well, yes.. But chanses aren't all that big you'll find any bugs (at least not windows specific), unless you try the w32api extension or bcompiler combined with zend optimizer... I've ran into many. The ones that really take the cake are the streams bugs, which have been around

Re: [PHP] Re: Moving to php

Well, yes.. But chanses aren't all that big you'll find any bugs (at least not windows specific), unless you try the w32api extension or bcompiler combined with zend optimizer... -- // DvDmanDT MSN: dvdmandt¤hotmail.com Mail: dvdmandt¤telia.com ## Please, if you are using

Re: [PHP] Re: Moving to php

DvDmanDT wrote: PHP is 99% (if not 100%) backwards compitable... PHP is even stable on WinME, and on XP.. Lots of ppl use it on 2k as well... Works fine.. And fast (well, depending on your installation and configuration)... Oh, and about support.. PHP on windows accutually have it's own official l

[PHP] Re: Moving to php

PHP is 99% (if not 100%) backwards compitable... PHP is even stable on WinME, and on XP.. Lots of ppl use it on 2k as well... Works fine.. And fast (well, depending on your installation and configuration)... Oh, and about support.. PHP on windows accutually have it's own official list/newsgroup (ph