On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 09:22 -0400, tedd wrote:
> At 2:35 PM -0400 4/26/07, Daniel Brown wrote:
> >Interesting and being in Pennsylvania, I'm in the "all-consent"
> >group but being originally from New Jersey, where I still thought it was
> >law, I'm confused isn't there a Federal ma
At 2:35 PM -0400 4/26/07, Daniel Brown wrote:
Interesting and being in Pennsylvania, I'm in the "all-consent"
group but being originally from New Jersey, where I still thought it was
law, I'm confused isn't there a Federal mandate about this as well?
You want confusing, try putti
The power of the Internet, free speach & freedom information at work!!
Quoting Daniel Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> John,
>
> You do realize now that this thread is going to show up in Google
> searches for wannabe spies, jealous spouses, lawsuit-filers, and anyone
> calling Sprint Custome
John,
You do realize now that this thread is going to show up in Google
searches for wannabe spies, jealous spouses, lawsuit-filers, and anyone
calling Sprint Customer "Service", right?
On 4/26/07, Tijnema ! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/26/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
On 4/26/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If your really interested in this subject try;
http://www.rcfp.org/taping/
Does there exists such page for world-wide phone calls?
Tijnema
Quoting Daniel Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Interesting and being in Pennsylvania, I'
If your really interested in this subject try;
http://www.rcfp.org/taping/
Quoting Daniel Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Interesting and being in Pennsylvania, I'm in the "all-consent"
> group but being originally from New Jersey, where I still thought it was
> law, I'm confused i
Thank you, sir! Didn't have the minute to look it up. Excellent
citing.
On 4/26/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Federal law says that at least one party taking part in the call MUST
consent to
the recording. (18 U.S.C. Sec. 2511(2)(d))
Quoting Daniel Brown <[EMAIL PROTEC
Federal law says that at least one party taking part in the call MUST consent to
the recording. (18 U.S.C. Sec. 2511(2)(d))
Quoting Daniel Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Interesting and being in Pennsylvania, I'm in the "all-consent"
> group but being originally from New Jersey, where I
Interesting and being in Pennsylvania, I'm in the "all-consent"
group but being originally from New Jersey, where I still thought it was
law, I'm confused isn't there a Federal mandate about this as well?
On 4/26/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the US you can
9 matches
Mail list logo
