I've never used the old-style constructors, but perhaps the semantics of
"parent::" changed and you need to instead use "$this->" as in
$this->Tag("option", $name);
That's a total guess. I don't have 5.2 handy to try it out, but both work in
5.3 using a simple example. Can you post the constr
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Kris Deugau wrote:
> Nathan Nobbe wrote:
>
>> probly something screwy going on w/ the old style of naming constructors.
>> 2
>> things,
>>
>> 1. can you post the Tag constructor as it reads now?
>>
>
> function Tag($tag='', $tagContent='') {
> $this->tagContent
Nathan Nobbe wrote:
probly something screwy going on w/ the old style of naming constructors. 2
things,
1. can you post the Tag constructor as it reads now?
function Tag($tag='', $tagContent='') {
$this->tagContent = $tagContent;
$this->tag = $tag;
$this->showEndTag = false;
$this->a
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Kris Deugau wrote:
> Tommy Pham wrote:
>
>> class SelectBoxOption extends Tag {
>>> function SelectBoxOption($name, $value, $selected=false) {
>>> parent::Tag("option", $name);
>>> $this->addAttribute("value", $value);
>>> if($selected) {
>
Tommy Pham wrote:
class SelectBoxOption extends Tag {
function SelectBoxOption($name, $value, $selected=false) {
parent::Tag("option", $name);
$this->addAttribute("value", $value);
if($selected) {
$this->addAttribute("selected", '', false);
}
if ($name
> -Original Message-
> From: Kris Deugau [mailto:kdeu...@vianet.ca]
> Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 11:57 AM
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: [PHP] String passed to object constructor turning into an
instance of
> that object?
>
> I'm in the
I'm in the process of migrating customer websites off an old legacy
server that's pushing EOL, and starting to show hardware failures.
One site is throwing errors on what, so far as I can tell, should be
perfectly working code.
The original code works fine on both CentOS 3 (PHP 4.3.2) and Cen
7 matches
Mail list logo
