georg wrote:
> Possibly this issue is for other fora, which you might direct me, anyways;
It's actually an HTML question. But most PHPers do a lot of HTML, too,
it turns. out. :)
> I have been dablling making my own little webpages, however having
> gotten a nice
> result jon fireforx, I realize
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 3:09 PM, georg wrote:
> Possibly this issue is for other fora, which you might direct me, anyways;
>
> I have been dablling making my own little webpages, however having gotten
> a nice
> result jon fireforx, I realize picture sizes gets treated very differntly
> on differe
Width and height parameters on an image aren't required in HTML, it's preferred
to use CSS. If different browsers are displaying the image at different sizes
I'd look at the browser zoom level maybe.
"Daniel Pöllmann" wrote:
>Well I think it depends.
>When the image is part of the website, lik
Well I think it depends.
When the image is part of the website, like a chart or something like that
you can use the height and width attribute inside the img tag (don't forget
alt for correct validation).
When the image is part of the layout or you're having multiple images like
in a gallery with t
On 13-06-02 09:09 AM, georg wrote:
Possibly this issue is for other fora, which you might direct me,
anyways;
I have been dablling making my own little webpages, however having
gotten a nice
result jon fireforx, I realize picture sizes gets treated very
differntly on different browsers !!!
so
Possibly this issue is for other fora, which you might direct me, anyways;
I have been dablling making my own little webpages, however having gotten a
nice
result jon fireforx, I realize picture sizes gets treated very differntly on
different browsers !!!
so the looks of the pages get very stra
6 matches
Mail list logo
