Hi all,
Why a static var don't cast as a dynamic one?
See file for more info...
--
Thanks for your attention,
Diogo Neves
Web Developer @ SAPO.pt by PrimeIT.pt
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Diogo Neves schreef:
Hi all,
Why a static var don't cast as a dynamic one?
See file for more info...
attachments get stripped.
don't cross post to internals, it's bad form.
try and formulate your questions a bit better
(it should take you more time to write your post than
it takes for someone
On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 17:09 +0200, Jochem Maas wrote:
Diogo Neves schreef:
Hi all,
Why a static var don't cast as a dynamic one?
See file for more info...
attachments get stripped.
don't cross post to internals, it's bad form.
try and formulate your questions a bit better
(it
Sorry, i have no webserver... but I can send all code in the email, right?
?php
define('a', 0);
$b = 0;
class foo {
private $c = 0;
private static $e = 0;
private static $f = '0';
public function techo() {
echo ' direct --' . 0 . 'br /';
echo ' a -- ' . a . 'br
Diogo Neves schreef:
Sorry, i have no webserver... but I can send all code in the email, right?
you can use pastebin.com.
I also recommend you write reproduce/example code like this for
the CLI so that other people don't have to go throught the hassle
of running via a webserver (br / is not
Hi again,
There's what you need ( I think )
Simplified version for web:
http://pastebin.com/d2bfcf495
Simplified version for CLI:
http://pastebin.com/d6ab96ed0
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Jochem Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Diogo Neves schreef:
Sorry, i have no webserver... but I can
Diogo Neves schreef:
Hi again,
There's what you need ( I think )
not so much that I need it, but the easier you make it
for some one to look at your issue the more likely it is
someone will. :-)
Simplified version for web:
http://pastebin.com/d2bfcf495
Simplified version for CLI:
Newbie :(
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 8:37 PM, Jochem Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Diogo Neves schreef:
Hi again,
There's what you need ( I think )
not so much that I need it, but the easier you make it
for some one to look at your issue the more likely it is
someone will. :-)
Simplified
Diogo Neves schreef:
Newbie :(
another tip: don't top post :-)
that said don't feel bad, you make a lot more effort than most
noobs ... personally I wish every newcomer would be so open
to pointers/critism/tips/etc and made as much effort as you do,
this place would be better off.
so ...
On Aug 31, 2008, at 2:17 PM, Jochem Maas wrote:
another tip: don't top post :-)
does top post mean to puts one's reply text at the top of the
email? People prefer it to be at the bottom?
Personally I like the new text to be at the top so I don't have to
scroll down to see the new part,
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 12:43 AM, Govinda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Aug 31, 2008, at 2:17 PM, Jochem Maas wrote:
another tip: don't top post :-)
does top post mean to puts one's reply text at the top of the email?
People prefer it to be at the bottom?
Personally I like the new text to be
Govinda schreef:
On Aug 31, 2008, at 2:17 PM, Jochem Maas wrote:
another tip: don't top post :-)
does top post mean to puts one's reply text at the top of the email?
exactly.
People prefer it to be at the bottom?
generally yes, the longer you hang around on mailing list and the like,
Govinda a écrit :
does top post mean to puts one's reply text at the top of the email?
People prefer it to be at the bottom?
Yes, because the regular way is to read top to bottom.
Personally I like the new text to be at the top so I don't have to
scroll down to see the new part
You
Old timers like it at the bottom, but I agree with the newcomers. Top
posting as long as it's not mixed with bottom posting can be easier for
people who follow the threads. (I know I mixed it here)
Thank you,
Micah Gersten
onShore Networks
Internal Developer
http://www.onshore.com
Diogo Neves
14 matches
Mail list logo
