On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 04:08:37 +0800, imacat wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 10:39:03 +0100
> "Ford, Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 08 August 2007 10:06, imacat wrote:
>>> I found that include_path seems to have a hidden fall back that's
>>> not documented anywhere. It seems to always look
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 23:56:34 -0500 (CDT)
"Richard Lynch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The default of php.ini starts with '.' in the first place, I think, so
> unless you go out of your way to change it, you'll get '.' from a
> fresh install anyway.
>
> I personally would not rely on the behaviour o
The default of php.ini starts with '.' in the first place, I think, so
unless you go out of your way to change it, you'll get '.' from a
fresh install anyway.
I personally would not rely on the behaviour of the code unless you
can find Documentation on http://php.net that says it will work this
wa
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 10:39:03 +0100
"Ford, Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 08 August 2007 10:06, imacat wrote:
> > I found that include_path seems to have a hidden fall back that's
> > not documented anywhere. It seems to always look for files in the
> > calling files' own directory.
> Isn
On 08 August 2007 10:06, imacat wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Hi. I'm new to this list. I searched the list archive
> and couldn't
> find an answer. I'm sorry if someone has asked before.
>
> I found that include_path seems to have a hidden fall back that's
> not documented anywhere. It see
5 matches
Mail list logo
