Jay Blanchard wrote:
I have a field that contains a value in parenthesis', but also contains
other text, for instance; (it is a legacy app that I am working with,
and by legacy I am saying pre-1980)
Upper voltage (124.1)
I know that \([0-9]*\) will get me (124.1), but I am totally forgetting
ho
On Thu, June 1, 2006 4:56 am, Merlin wrote:
>>> ^(.*)_a[0-9](.*).htm$
Don't know what it will help, but you need \\.htm in PHP to get \.htm
in PCRE to escape the . in the extension.
--
Like Music?
http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, vi
Merlin wrote:
Hi there,
I do work on following regex:
^(.*)_a[0-9](.*).htm$
This should be valid for "test_a9393.htm", but not for "9393.htm" as
ther is no leading _a infront of the number.
Unfortunatelly this also works for the 9393.htm file. Can somebody give
me a hint why the regex also
Robin Vickery schrieb:
On 01/06/06, Merlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi there,
I do work on following regex:
^(.*)_a[0-9](.*).htm$
This should be valid for "test_a9393.htm", but not for "9393.htm" as
ther is no leading _a infront of the number.
Unfortunatelly this also works for the 9393.htm
On 01/06/06, Merlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi there,
I do work on following regex:
^(.*)_a[0-9](.*).htm$
This should be valid for "test_a9393.htm", but not for "9393.htm" as
ther is no leading _a infront of the number.
Unfortunatelly this also works for the 9393.htm file. Can somebody give
[snip]
Hi there,
I do work on following regex:
^(.*)_a[0-9](.*).htm$
This should be valid for "test_a9393.htm", but not for "9393.htm" as
ther is no leading _a infront of the number.
Unfortunatelly this also works for the 9393.htm file. Can somebody give
me a hint why the regex also is true fo
Dave Goodchild schrieb:
On 01/06/06, Merlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi there,
I do work on following regex:
^(.*)_a[0-9](.*).htm$
This should be valid for "test_a9393.htm", but not for "9393.htm" as
ther is no leading _a infront of the number.
Unfortunatelly this also works for the 9393.h
On 01/06/06, Merlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi there,
I do work on following regex:
^(.*)_a[0-9](.*).htm$
This should be valid for "test_a9393.htm", but not for "9393.htm" as
ther is no leading _a infront of the number.
Unfortunatelly this also works for the 9393.htm file. Can somebody giv
This one time, at band camp, "Robert Samuel White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't be rude. I've already don't all of that. Nothing came up. I've been
> programming for 20 years (since I was 11 years old) so I'm not a slacker
> when it comes to learning new things, however, I have always fou
On May 16, 2006, at 7:53 PM, Chrome wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Robert Samuel White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 May 2006 01:42
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: RE: [PHP] Regex Help for URL's [ANSWER]
That's what I was doing. I was parsing A:HREF, IMG:SRC,
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Samuel White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 17 May 2006 01:42
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: RE: [PHP] Regex Help for URL's [ANSWER]
>
>
> > If we are talking clickable links, why not focus on the cons
> If we are talking clickable links, why not focus on the construct
> itself? Otherwise URLs are just part of the page's textual content... Very
> difficult to parse that
> Disseminating an tag isn't brain-meltingly difficult with a regex if
> you put your mind to it... With or without quotes,
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Samuel White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 17 May 2006 01:28
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: RE: [PHP] Regex Help for URL's [ANSWER]
>
> In my opinion, it is the most reasonable solution. I have looked all ov
in a
page, then they'll code their pages to make use of this limitation.
-Original Message-
From: Chrome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 8:24 PM
To: 'Robert Samuel White'; php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: RE: [PHP] Regex Help for URL's [ANS
On Tue, May 16, 2006 4:22 pm, Jochem Maas wrote:
> personally I would assume anyone who had been programming for 20 yrs
> would have a reasonable understanding of regexps.
Nope.
:-)
I got WAY past 20 year mark before I even began to pretend to
understand the minimal amount of regex I can do now.
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Samuel White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 17 May 2006 01:16
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: RE: [PHP] Regex Help for URL's [ANSWER]
>
> All pages used by my content management system must be in a valid for
All pages used by my content management system must be in a valid format.
Old-school style pages are never created so the solution I have come up with
is perfect for my needs.
Thank you.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Tue, May 16, 2006 6:21 pm, Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 18:49, Robert Samuel White wrote:
>> In case any one is looking for a solution to a similar problem as
>> me, here
> preg_match_all("#(\"|')http://(.*)(\"|')#U", $content, $matches);
And it's missing the original requirem
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 18:49, Robert Samuel White wrote:
> In case any one is looking for a solution to a similar problem as me, here
> is the answer. I used the code from my original post as my guiding light,
> and with some experimentation, I figured it out.
>
> To get any URL, regardless of whe
In case any one is looking for a solution to a similar problem as me, here
is the answer. I used the code from my original post as my guiding light,
and with some experimentation, I figured it out.
To get any URL, regardless of where it is located, use this:
preg_match_all("#\'http://(.*)\'#U",
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Samuel White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 16 May 2006 21:32
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: RE: [PHP] Regex Help for URL's
>
> Don't be rude. I've already don't all of that. Nothing came up
16, 2006 4:28 PM
To: Robert Samuel White
Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Regex Help for URL's
Robert Samuel White wrote:
Can someone help me modify the following code?
It was designed to search for all instances of [LEVEL#]...[/LEVEL#]
I need a preg_match_all that w
I am trying to get all of the urls in a web document, so that I can append
information to the urls when needed (when the url points to a domain that
resides on my server). It allows me to pass session information across the
domains of my network. Currently, I use a class I wrote to handle this, b
us to do it for. Simple
enough, don't you think.
Because it makes the email hard to read.
Why is top posting bad?
-Original Message-
From: Jochem Maas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 4:28 PM
To: Robert Samuel White
Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 16:31, Robert Samuel White wrote:
> Don't be rude. I've already don't all of that. Nothing came up. I've been
> programming for 20 years (since I was 11 years old) so I'm not a slacker
> when it comes to learning new things, however, I have always found regular
> expression
ite
Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Regex Help for URL's
Robert Samuel White wrote:
> Can someone help me modify the following code?
>
> It was designed to search for all instances of [LEVEL#]...[/LEVEL#]
>
> I need a preg_match_all that will search for all
Robert Samuel White wrote:
Can someone help me modify the following code?
It was designed to search for all instances of [LEVEL#]...[/LEVEL#]
I need a preg_match_all that will search for all of instances of an URL.
It should be sophisticated enough to find something as complicated as this:
ht
Hi,
Saturday, February 4, 2006, 2:53:32 PM, you wrote:
p> Hi,
p> I'm still trying to get to grips with REGEX and have hit a hurdle with
p> the following:
p> I have this bit of text:
p> (\(EX\) RV-6 )
p> I want to remove the '\(EX\)' part of it
p> so leaving just: ( RV-6 )
p> Any suggestions wo
>>> > I have this bit of text:
>>> > (\(EX\) RV-6 )
>>> >
>>> > I want to remove the '\(EX\)' part of it
>>> > so leaving just: ( RV-6 )
$text = '(\(EX\) RV-6 )';
$str = str_replace('\(EX\)','',$text);
As Burhan put it, regex is not always the solution to your problem -
in most cases, using re
Alexis,
> Unfortunately, for what I'm trying to do, it is of little use. I
> probably should have mentioned that the bit of text I used is actually
> just part of a much bigger bit of text so exploding on a space would
> cause havoc with the rest of it. Hence the REGEX question.
$text = '
Hi Murray,
The length of text is quite long..it is in fact a 150+ page PDF file,
which as it's using an earlier version of PDF I can 'translate' into a
format that I can extract data from..it's just this one bit of text that
I'm stuck on. Yes it does appear multiple times, but the pattern is
Thanks for that...and yes that would do very nicely.
Unfortunately, for what I'm trying to do, it is of little use. I
probably should have mentioned that the bit of text I used is actually
just part of a much bigger bit of text so exploding on a space would
cause havoc with the rest of it. Hen
> > I have this bit of text:
> > (\(EX\) RV-6 )
> >
> > I want to remove the '\(EX\)' part of it
> > so leaving just: ( RV-6 )
$text = '(\(EX\) RV-6 )';
$str = str_replace('\(EX\)','',$text);
As Burhan put it, regex is not always the solution to your problem -
in most cases, using regex for this
phplists wrote:
Hi,
I'm still trying to get to grips with REGEX and have hit a hurdle with
the following:
I have this bit of text:
(\(EX\) RV-6 )
I want to remove the '\(EX\)' part of it
so leaving just: ( RV-6 )
$text = '(\(EX\) RV-6 )';
$bits = explode(' ',$text);
$leaving = '( '.$bits[0
Thanks for the options David.
I think I'll go for the last option as I'm determined to get to grips
with REGEX, and your first choice of REGEX won't work for me as the
'RV-6' bit can be too variable with what it contains, whereas the \(EX\)
bit IS more constant...it's only the EX bit that chan
I assume that the text inside can change around a fair bit. If the
string is of a fixed with or simple format you can just use substr() and
friends, it's simpler and faster.
That said, there is really two approaches that I can see with this string.
You can match on the spaces to extract the 'RV-
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 08:25:57AM -0500, Mike Smith wrote:
> I'm trying to save myself some time by extracting certain variables
> from a string:
>
> 102-90 E 42 X 42 X 70 3/8
>
> I've been testing with: http://www.quanetic.com/regex.php
> and have been somewhat successful. Using this pattern:
>
Eric, thanks for replying. I couldn't quite get that to work. Albert,
I'm currently working with what you suggested, though the unit names
are not that consistent:
$vals = preg_split(' ?X? ',$unit[1]);
echo "".$unit[1]."\n";
echo "Panel: ".$vals[0]."Width: ".$vals[1]."Height:
".$vals[2]."\n";
202
This should do the trick:
/(\d+) ?X ?(\d+) ?X ?(\d+ [\d\/]+)/i
(at least it would in Perl)
Le 13 Janvier 2006 08:25, Mike Smith a écrit :
> I'm trying to save myself some time by extracting certain variables
> from a string:
>
> 102-90 E 42 X 42 X 70 3/8
>
> I've been testing with: http://www.q
Mike Smith wrote:
> I'm trying to save myself some time by extracting certain variables
> from a string:
>
> 102-90 E 42 X 42 X 70 3/8
If this string is always in this format
E X X
then you could try something like:
// Very much untested
$unit = '102-90 E 42 X 42 X 70 3/8';
$split1 = explo
John Nichel wrote:
Okay, maybe it's just the fact that I'm concentration on getting out of
here for the holidays more than I am on my work, but I'm pulling my hair
out. Say I have a string -
Now, is the time; for all good men! to come to the aide? of their
What I want to do is drop everythin
Shaun wrote:
Hi M,
Thanks for your help, the code works fine except if there is a line break in
the html, for example
this works
test
But this doesnt
test
Any ideas?
See the last user contributed note from *csaba at alum dot mit dot edu
*at http://us3.php.net/manual/en/reference.p
The second parameter to preg_replace is the replacement string (with
optional backreferences), not another patern.
Use '/(.*)(?=<\/p>)/' for patern, 'href="edit_paragraph&text=$1">$1' for replacement string, however,
this does not urlencode the text parameter. You can use
preg_replace_callback
I think you are doing it wrong, though reading other people's regex
easily is a skill I lack.
It is however very possible.
The php manual has a section on recursive regex where it explains how to
solve the bracket problem.
http://php.net/manual/en/reference.pcre.pattern.syntax.php#regexp.refer
Chris,
if (preg_match("/^[A-Za-z0-9\.]+\s*[A-Za-z0-9\.]*$/", "Co. Dublin"))
echo "TRUE";
else
echo "FALSE";
prints "TRUE" for me.
Cheers,
David Grant
Chris Boget wrote:
> Why isn't this regular expression
>
> ^[A-Za-z0-9\.]+\s*[A-Za-z0-9\.]*$
>
> allowing for this value:
>
> 'Co. Du
On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 10:55, Chris Boget wrote:
> Why isn't this regular expression
>
> ^[A-Za-z0-9\.]+\s*[A-Za-z0-9\.]*$
>
> allowing for this value:
>
> 'Co. Dublin' (w/o the single quotes)
>
> ? It's failing the regular expression match...
Do you have that expression embedded in single or
Leonard Burton wrote:
HI,
Tuesday, November 15, 2005, 8:39:19 PM, you wrote:
Here are how they look
W1W
W1AW
WA1W
AD4HZ
N9URK
WB6NOA
4N1UBG
Let's do it this way... What are the rules for a valid callsign?
Basicly, you see an example of each different type of callsign. Other
than the pa
> > The only problem with this is that it would take "444" which is not a
> > valid call.
Wikipedia defines a HAM call sign here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Call_sign#Amateur_radio
A regex based upon this definition might be:
/\b(([A-Z]{1,2})|([A-Z][0-9]))[0-9][A-Z]{1,3}\b/
I tested this out
> -Original Message-
> From: Leonard Burton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 16 November 2005 03:39
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
>
> Basically here is the regex I used (I am not the best with regexes):
>
> $pattern = "/^[0-9]?[A-Z]{1,2}[0-9][A-Z]{1,3}/";
>
> Here are how they look
>
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 12:25:22AM -0500, Leonard Burton wrote:
> HI Curt,
> > > W1W
> > > W1AW
> > > WA1W
> > > AD4HZ
> > > N9URK
> > > WB6NOA
> > > 4N1UBG
> > Ok, so i can conclude so far we have alpha numeric chars minimum of
> > 3 chars up to 6, this would make a regex:
> > /[A-Z0-9]{3,6}/
>
HI Curt,
> > W1W
> > W1AW
> > WA1W
> > AD4HZ
> > N9URK
> > WB6NOA
> > 4N1UBG
> Ok, so i can conclude so far we have alpha numeric chars minimum of
> 3 chars up to 6, this would make a regex:
> /[A-Z0-9]{3,6}/
The only problem with this is that it would take "444" which is not a
valid call.
> > $
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 10:39:19PM -0500, Leonard Burton wrote:
> HI Curt,
>
> Thanks for the reply,
>
> > What does a amateur radio callsign look like? And in what context
> > are you trying to parse this callsign?
>
> Basically here is the regex I used (I am not the best with regexes):
>
> $p
HI Curt,
Thanks for the reply,
> What does a amateur radio callsign look like? And in what context
> are you trying to parse this callsign?
Basically here is the regex I used (I am not the best with regexes):
$pattern = "/^[0-9]?[A-Z]{1,2}[0-9][A-Z]{1,3}/";
Here are how they look
W1W
W1AW
WA1W
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 03:47:21PM -0500, Leonard Burton wrote:
>
> Does anyone know of a regex to work for Amateur Radio Callsigns that
> will work with any from across the world?
What does a amateur radio callsign look like? And in what context
are you trying to parse this callsign?
Curt.
--
On 10/28/05, Tom Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I would do it with a small class like this:
>
> class mac{
> var $mac='';
> var $is_valid = false;
> function mac($mac){
> $mac = preg_replace('/[^0-9A-F]/','',strtoupper($mac));
> if($this->is_valid =
> preg_match('/^(\w{2})(\w
Hi,
Thursday, October 27, 2005, 3:15:30 AM, you wrote:
JG> I am having a problem with a couple of function I have written to check
JG> for a type of string, attempt to fix it and pass it back to the main
JG> function. Any help is appreciated.
I would do it with a small class like this:
is_valid
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 00:00 +0200, Jochem Maas wrote:
> gonna jump on your thread there Jasper, I would
> like to comment on your function and ask you a question:
>
> which is 'better' (for what), preg_*() or ereg[i]*()?
I prefer preg_*(), but I used eregi() because I couldn't be bothered
figurin
Jochem Maas wrote:
Richard Heyes wrote:
Jochem Maas wrote:
> gonna jump on your thread there Jasper, I would
> like to comment on your function and ask you a question:
>
> which is 'better' (for what), preg_*() or ereg[i]*()?
preg_*, for anything. They're faster, and more versatile.
coo
Richard Heyes wrote:
Jochem Maas wrote:
> gonna jump on your thread there Jasper, I would
> like to comment on your function and ask you a question:
>
> which is 'better' (for what), preg_*() or ereg[i]*()?
preg_*, for anything. They're faster, and more versatile.
cool cheers.
I guess you
Jochem Maas wrote:
> gonna jump on your thread there Jasper, I would
> like to comment on your function and ask you a question:
>
> which is 'better' (for what), preg_*() or ereg[i]*()?
preg_*, for anything. They're faster, and more versatile.
--
Richard Heyes
http://www.phpguru.org
--
PHP Gene
gonna jump on your thread there Jasper, I would
like to comment on your function and ask you a question:
which is 'better' (for what), preg_*() or ereg[i]*()?
Jasper Bryant-Greene wrote:
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 12:24 -0600, Jason Gerfen wrote:
The code I just showed you is supposed to do the fol
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 12:24 -0600, Jason Gerfen wrote:
> The code I just showed you is supposed to do the following, the
> chk_mac() returns a true or false on the vars $mac1, $mac2 and $mac3.
> $mac3 is the only var that should not be thrown into the fix_mac()
> function which is working corre
The code I just showed you is supposed to do the following, the
chk_mac() returns a true or false on the vars $mac1, $mac2 and $mac3.
$mac3 is the only var that should not be thrown into the fix_mac()
function which is working correctly. The problem is when $mac1 and
$mac2 get put into the fi
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 12:07 -0600, Jason Gerfen wrote:
> Um I did actually, but I will re-interate the problem with more detail.
>
> the vars $mac1, $mac2, & $mac3 are to get passed to the chk_mac()
> function which determines if it is a valid hex representation of a h/w
> address, if it does no
Um I did actually, but I will re-interate the problem with more detail.
the vars $mac1, $mac2, & $mac3 are to get passed to the chk_mac()
function which determines if it is a valid hex representation of a h/w
address, if it does not meet the criteria of having a ":" separating
every two charac
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 11:15 -0600, Jason Gerfen wrote:
> I am having a problem with a couple of function I have written to check
> for a type of string, attempt to fix it and pass it back to the main
> function. Any help is appreciated.
[snip]
Would you mind telling us what the problem was?
--
yes, it is equal, but i'd rather use file() function
Gustav Wiberg wrote:
Hi there!
I want to get conents of a file and split into a array...
$s = file_get_contents($fileName);
$splitS = preg_split("/\n/",$s);
Is this equal to using $splitS = file($fileName) ?
/G
http://www.varupirat
Greetings folks. Thanks Murray and Philip for the quick responses.
Adding the /s modifier worked perfectly.
Cheers,
Pablo
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> Hi, folks. I'm having trouble with a simple regex. I'm sure it's just
> something small that I'm missing but nothing I'm trying is working.
>
> In an HTML file I have comments like this:
>
>
> various html crap here
>
>
> Here's the regex I'm using:
>
> /(.*?)/
>
> And then the call to
Hi, folks. I'm having trouble with a simple regex. I'm sure it's just
something small that I'm missing but nothing I'm trying is working.
In an HTML file I have comments like this:
various html crap here
Here's the regex I'm using:
/(.*?)/
And then the call to preg_match_all():
preg_mat
On Monday 19 September 2005 09:03 am, Shaun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to implement a regular expression so that I have a number
> between 0.00 and 1.00. the following works except I can go up to 1.99
>
> $regexp = "/^[0-1]{1}.[0-9]{2}/";
>
> Can anyone help here please?
>
> Thanks
$regexp = "/^
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 10:11, John Nichel wrote:
> Shaun wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am trying to implement a regular expression so that I have a number
> > between 0.00 and 1.00. the following works except I can go up to 1.99
> >
> > $regexp = "/^[0-1]{1}.[0-9]{2}/";
> >
> > Can anyone help here p
Shaun wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to implement a regular expression so that I have a number
between 0.00 and 1.00. the following works except I can go up to 1.99
$regexp = "/^[0-1]{1}.[0-9]{2}/";
Can anyone help here please?
Thanks
May have to go outside just a regex...
if ( preg_match ( "/
Merlin wrote:
Hi there,
I would like to create a regex which only executes if the client does
not come from a specified IP adress.
Any ideas how to place this into the Rewrite Rule regex?:
I'm betting members of the Apache mailing list know.
--
John C. Nichel
ÜberGeek
KegWorks.com
716.856.
Merlin wrote:
I would like to create a regex which only executes if the client does
not come from a specified IP adress.
Any ideas how to place this into the Rewrite Rule regex?:
What does this have to do with PHP?
http://www.google.com/search?q=regular+expression
The top four or five resul
Jay Blanchard wrote:
> [snip]
> Assuming unix, I'd do the following from the root of the application
> to get a list
> of files that contain queries:
>
> $ egrep "=[:space:]*\".*\b(SELECT|INSERT|UPDATE)\b" * -ril
> ...
>
> Anyway, that's how I'd do it. Hope you got something out of this...
> :) [/
[snip]
>
> That is a good start, now all I need to do is get the whole query(s)
Get them from the mysql logs?
[/snip]
While that sounds like a good idea there are two things that hamper the
effectiveness of this is a total solution;
1. The logs have many queries from other applications that *do
On 8/11/05, Jay Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That is a good start, now all I need to do is get the whole query(s)
Get them from the mysql logs?
-robin
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[snip]
Assuming unix, I'd do the following from the root of the application to
get a list
of files that contain queries:
$ egrep "=[:space:]*\".*\b(SELECT|INSERT|UPDATE)\b" * -ril
...
Anyway, that's how I'd do it. Hope you got something out of this... :)
[/snip]
That is a good start, now all I
Jay Blanchard wrote:
> I have a rather interesting issue. I need to locate every query in
> every PHP application we have for an integration project. I have
> started doing some research, but I wanted throw this out there as a
> little exercize because it is interesting.
>
> Several queries are wri
On 8/4/05, Lizet Pena de Sola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, it's not the regexp for detecting email addresses what I need,
> that's widely published, thanks. I'm using ereg to match this regular
> expression:
>
> (On)[\s\w\d\W\S\D\n]*(wr[i|o]te[s]?:)
>
> That will match phrases like
> "On 8/3/
a,
Lizet
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Bointon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 8:57 AM
To: PHP General
Subject: Re: [PHP] Regex help
On 2 Aug 2005, at 15:12, Robin Vickery wrote:
> I don't suppose this is the place for a rant about the futility of
> ch
On 2 Aug 2005, at 15:12, Robin Vickery wrote:
I don't suppose this is the place for a rant about the futility of
checking email addresses with a regexp?
Though I will agree with you to some extent, I've had quite a lot of
success with this, which is pretty thorough:
^(?:[\w\!\#\$\%\&\'\*\+
On 8/2/05, Robin Vickery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't suppose this is the place for a rant about the futility of
> checking email addresses with a regexp?
>
> -robin
Let Richard Lynch tell him. He's good at regex's, and it's HIS email
address that never makes it through!
Dotan Cohen
ht
On 8/2/05, Chris Boget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to validate an email address and for the life of me I
> cannot figure out why the following regex is not working:
>
> $email = "[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
> $regex =
> "^([a-zA-Z0-9_\.\-\']+)@((\[[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.)|(([a-
I am currently creating a once off text parser for a rather large
document that i need to strip out bits of information on certain
lines.
The line looks something like :
"Adress line here, postcode, country Tel: +27 112233665 Fax: 221145221
Website: http://www.urlhere.com E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECT
> So, thinking about it a little more, I decided what I was looking for was
> a
> regular expression that would allow me to replace any incidences of
> hyphens
> when not contained within tags (i.e., when not contained between "<" and
> ">").
>
> And this is where things have ground to a halt.
Hi
> [Course, when you *DO* need RegEx it's *more* than a bit of a headache.
> More like a migraine :-)]
One of these days I will truly master regular expressions. After that,
enlightenment should be easy.
Regards,
Murray
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: ht
On Mon, May 23, 2005 8:43 am, W Luke said:
> I really struggle with regex, and would appreciate some guidance.
> Basically, I have a whole load of files (HTML) which are updated every
> few minutes. I need to go through each line, looking for the word
> CONFIRMED: (which is always in capitals, and
W Luke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I really struggle with regex, and would appreciate some guidance.
> Basically, I have a whole load of files (HTML) which are updated every
> few minutes. I need to go through each line, looking for the word
> CONFIRMED: (which is always in capitals, and always super
On Mon, 23 May 2005, W Luke wrote:
Hi,
I really struggle with regex, and would appreciate some guidance.
Basically, I have a whole load of files (HTML) which are updated every
few minutes. I need to go through each line, looking for the word
CONFIRMED: (which is always in capitals, and always
W Luke wrote:
Hi,
I really struggle with regex, and would appreciate some guidance.
Basically, I have a whole load of files (HTML) which are updated every
few minutes. I need to go through each line, looking for the word
CONFIRMED: (which is always in capitals, and always superseded by a
colo
Murry's solution here is ideal since it only captures the single occurrence.
Since I want to use it for a preg_replace(), it is perfect.
A couple of folks sent this pattern [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]; but, it doesn't work because I
then have to remove the unwanted caracters on either si
On Monday 16 May 2005 22:53, Al wrote:
> What pattern can I use to match ONLY single occurrences of a character in a
> string.
>
> e.g., "Some text @ and some mo@@re and [EMAIL PROTECTED], etc @@@.
Use the following:
/(^@)(@{1})(^@)/
This way you'll be sure the regexp will match only single occu
$text = 'Some text @ and some mo@@re and [EMAIL PROTECTED], etc @@@.';
/** Word boundaries before and after @ */
$regex = '/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/';
preg_match_all($regex, $text, $matches);
var_dump($matches);
?>
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.n
> Try (for example if character was "A") ...
>
> ([^A]|^)A([^A]|$)
>
> This matches four cases:
> A is at beginning of string and there is another letter after it,
> A has a letter before it and a letter after it,
> A is at end of string and there is a letter before it,
> or A is the only charact
> What pattern can I use to match ONLY single occurrences of a character in
> a string.
>
> e.g., "Some text @ and some mo@@re and [EMAIL PROTECTED], etc @@@.
>
> I only want the two occurrences with a single occurrence of "@".
>
> @{1} doesn't work; there are 4 matches.
>
> Thanks
Please
> What pattern can I use to match ONLY single occurrences of a character in
> a string.
>
> e.g., "Some text @ and some mo@@re and [EMAIL PROTECTED], etc @@@.
>
> I only want the two occurrences with a single occurrence of "@".
>
> @{1} doesn't work; there are 4 matches.
"/[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EM
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Al wrote:
What pattern can I use to match ONLY single occurrences of a character in a
string.
e.g., "Some text @ and some mo@@re and [EMAIL PROTECTED], etc @@@.
I only want the two occurrences with a single occurrence of "@".
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
should do it I
Try (for example if character was "A") ...
([^A]|^)A([^A]|$)
This matches four cases:
A is at beginning of string and there is another letter after it,
A has a letter before it and a letter after it,
A is at end of string and there is a letter before it,
or A is the only character in the string.
201 - 300 of 578 matches
Mail list logo
