On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 12:46 AM, Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 18:37, Robert Cummings
> wrote:
> >
> > Damn... here I thought the hint was-- it begins with "tme". If only I had
> > caught that abso-bloody-lutely embodied the principle, then I could have
> > back-frickin-tracked
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 20:04, Stuart Dallas wrote:
>
> Haven't you been told before that offers of and requests for services of a
> personal nature should be kept off the list!!
I don't believe so, but then - if I had - I would've ignored the
order just as now.
--
Network Infrastructure M
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 18:37, Robert Cummings wrote:
>
> Damn... here I thought the hint was-- it begins with "tme". If only I had
> caught that abso-bloody-lutely embodied the principle, then I could have
> back-frickin-tracked from the principle, to the meaning, to the word itself.
> That would
On 11-07-15 04:21 PM, Daniel Brown wrote:
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 16:04, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
I'm still not getting it, and the only dictionary I have about is some
tiny pocket one I've had since I was 9!
The word was 'tmesis', which is a linguistic phenomenon in which
words or phra
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 16:04, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
>
>
> I'm still not getting it, and the only dictionary I have about is some
> tiny pocket one I've had since I was 9!
The word was 'tmesis', which is a linguistic phenomenon in which
words or phrases have other words or phrases thrown in
On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 10:42 +0100, Richard Quadling wrote:
> On 15 July 2011 01:42, Micky Hulse wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 4:19 PM, George Langley
> > wrote:
> >> He gave you a beautiful hint:
> >
> > :: slaps self on forehead ::
> >
> > I should've known!!! :D
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Micky
On 15 July 2011 01:42, Micky Hulse wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 4:19 PM, George Langley
> wrote:
>> He gave you a beautiful hint:
>
> :: slaps self on forehead ::
>
> I should've known!!! :D
>
> Thanks!
> Micky
He he!
Well done. It's a great word. My wife and I really didn't think
anythin
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 4:19 PM, George Langley wrote:
> He gave you a beautiful hint:
:: slaps self on forehead ::
I should've known!!! :D
Thanks!
Micky
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
- Original Message -
From: Micky Hulse
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 4:02 AM, Richard Quadling
> wrote:
> > My daughter (6 or 7 at the time) came up with T, M and E. I was
> > abso-bloody-lutely amazed she managed to find a word starting
> with T,
> > M and E.
>
> What was the word?
-
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 4:02 AM, Richard Quadling wrote:
> My daughter (6 or 7 at the time) came up with T, M and E. I was
> abso-bloody-lutely amazed she managed to find a word starting with T,
> M and E.
What was the word?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visi
On 2011-07-14, at 4:36 AM, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>
> That's a massive pet hate of mine, along with using here/hear in the wrong
> way and those who have no idea of the difference between "there", "their" &
> "they're". Makes me want to beat them upside the head with a dictionary :)
---
> On 14 July 2011 11:36, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> Makes me want to beat them upside the head with a dictionary :)
In our house, our Big Red Book _IS_ a massive Oxford Dictionary.
We play a game with the kids. Think of 3 random letters and find a
word starting with it.
My daughter (6 or 7 at the
On 14 July 2011 11:36, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> That's a massive pet hate of mine, along with using here/hear in the wrong
> way and those who have no idea of the difference between "there", "their" &
> "they're". Makes me want to beat them upside the head with a dictionary :)
> Thanks,
> Ash
I
>Particularly as it's written by a fathead who thinks that "lose" is
>spelt "loose".
>
>--
>Cheers -- Tim
>
>--
>PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
>To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
That's a massive pet hate of mine, along with using here/hear in the wrong way
On 14 Jul 2011 at 01:59, Lester Caine wrote:
> Daevid Vincent wrote:
>> (at the risk of starting another $h!t storm like the last time)
>>
>> http://wiki.theory.org/YourLanguageSucks#PHP_sucks_because:
>
> Perhaps when they get around to checking the facts ... most of the content
> will
> be del
I'm actually interested in finding out if there are any languages that don't
suck in any way... I know and have programmed in about 29, i have yet to
find a language that makes 100% sense and i have no complaints about.
However i still choose PHP over many, many other languages and i implement
php
*ck on somebody telling that all languages
suxx.
Please ask somebody for a hobby.
> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 01:59:27 +0100
> From: les...@lsces.co.uk
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP] Your language sucks because...
>
> Daevid Vincent wrote:
> > (at the
Daevid Vincent wrote:
(at the risk of starting another $h!t storm like the last time)
http://wiki.theory.org/YourLanguageSucks#PHP_sucks_because:
Perhaps when they get around to checking the facts ... most of the content will
be deleted? A number of the -ve's I'd personally flag as +ve's and
Under the CSS section:
No way to modularize or programmatically generate lengths. Can't say:
{ width:50% - 2px; }
That's so true!! I wish I could do the above...
Oh, and why is the PHP section so damned long?!?
Good read, thanks. :)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To uns
19 matches
Mail list logo
