On Sep 20, 2013, at 1:33 PM, php-general-digest-h...@lists.php.net wrote:
Friday's Question
322111 by: Tedd Sperling
--
From: Tedd Sperling t...@sperling.com
Subject: Friday's Question
Date: September 20, 2013
I thought I posted this in the php.net web site under the ksort user notes,
but I don't know if it would be approved to be placed in the web site.
Would ksort($sortarr,SORT_STRING) on a 1 dimensional array with a key
comprised of
a person's name,
-, and
time stamp
I..E. (key: david
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 16:06, David Savage dsav...@cytelcom.com wrote:
I thought I posted this in the php.net web site under the ksort user notes,
but I don't know if it would be approved to be placed in the web site.
Would ksort($sortarr,SORT_STRING) on a 1 dimensional array with a key
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:06 PM, David Savage dsav...@cytelcom.com wrote:
Would ksort($sortarr,SORT_STRING) on a 1 dimensional array with a key
comprised of
a person's name,
-, and
time stamp
I..E. (key: david savage-2011-12-12 14:43:00)
actually delete duplicate keys from the array, if
Readers,
Looking through the mail lists archives, only the following message
seems to advise about the possibility to use gnuplot:
http://marc.info/?l=php-generalm=96248542218029w=2
Is it possible to start gnuplot using php, to plot a graph from
postgresql data. For example, a table is created
e-letter wrote:
Readers,
Looking through the mail lists archives, only the following message
seems to advise about the possibility to use gnuplot:
http://marc.info/?l=php-generalm=96248542218029w=2
Is it possible to start gnuplot using php, to plot a graph from
postgresql data. For
On 02/14/2011 05:53 AM, Florin Jurcovici wrote:
Hi.
Me stupid, my bad.
Turns out the bug isn't in my code, but in the debugger. I'm working
with the trial version of Zend Studio. When inside the call to the
static method, everything is undefined. If I look at variables using
the
Hi.
Me stupid, my bad.
Turns out the bug isn't in my code, but in the debugger. I'm working
with the trial version of Zend Studio. When inside the call to the
static method, everything is undefined. If I look at variables using
the Expressions view, I can see their values, and they _are_
I'm looking for a nice, user (i.e. me) friendly general-purpose IDE,
where most of my work will be done in PHP.
I'm considering using Dreamweaver CS4 as my IDE, where I will disable
most of the WYSIWYG elements and use all of the other features that I
need/want (contextual syntax coloring
Lester Caine wrote:
Casey wrote:
Hi list,
I'm looking for a nice, user (i.e. me) friendly general-purpose IDE,
where most of my work will be done in PHP.
I'm considering using Dreamweaver CS4 as my IDE, where I will disable
most of the WYSIWYG elements and use all of the other features that I
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 20:28 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 20:12 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Waynn Lue wrote:
With MySQL, you can change the DB from query to query with
mysql_select_db. The alternative as I stated in my last post is
Ashley Sheridan schreef:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 20:28 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 20:12 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Waynn Lue wrote:
With MySQL, you can change the DB from query to query with
mysql_select_db. The alternative as I stated
[snip]
a new connection, but in terms of op codes, a new connection is
created.
no idea why your going on about op codes, and no a new connection is not
made - there is merely switching between DBs on a single connection.
it's the same as connecting with the mysql cmdline util and being able
to
Waynn Lue wrote:
I sent an email to the mysql list, but it reminded me of a question I had
for people structuring their PHP code. What's the general way that people
structure their connections? Right now, I spawn off two mysql_connect calls
at the top of the file that includes my database
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 08:55 +1100, Chris wrote:
Waynn Lue wrote:
I sent an email to the mysql list, but it reminded me of a question I had
for people structuring their PHP code. What's the general way that people
structure their connections? Right now, I spawn off two mysql_connect calls
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 08:55 +1100, Chris wrote:
Waynn Lue wrote:
I sent an email to the mysql list, but it reminded me of a question I had
for people structuring their PHP code. What's the general way that people
structure their connections? Right now, I
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:25 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 08:55 +1100, Chris wrote:
Waynn Lue wrote:
I sent an email to the mysql list, but it reminded me of a question I had
for people structuring their PHP code. What's the general
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:25 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 08:55 +1100, Chris wrote:
Waynn Lue wrote:
I sent an email to the mysql list, but it reminded me of a question I had
for people
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:43 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:25 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 08:55 +1100, Chris wrote:
Waynn Lue wrote:
I sent an email to
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:43 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:25 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 08:55 +1100, Chris wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:49 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:43 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:25 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:49 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:43 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:25 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:57 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:49 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:43 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On
With MySQL, you can change the DB from query to query with
mysql_select_db. The alternative as I stated in my last post is to use
the fully qualified table name (database.table) in your query. MySQL
doesn't care which DB you have open if you do that. In both of these
cases, the same
The answer in your case is not to combine the DBs necessarily, but
consolidate the connections used. Like I said, you can use 2 MySQL DBs
on the same connection in PHP. There's no reason to sacrifice
separation of data.
Forgot about this one until now.. mysql also supports the extended
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:57 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:49 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:43 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Waynn Lue wrote:
With MySQL, you can change the DB from query to query with
mysql_select_db. The alternative as I stated in my last post is to use
the fully qualified table name (database.table) in your query. MySQL
doesn't care which DB you have open if you do that. In both of these
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 20:12 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Waynn Lue wrote:
With MySQL, you can change the DB from query to query with
mysql_select_db. The alternative as I stated in my last post is to use
the fully qualified table name (database.table) in your query. MySQL
doesn't care
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 20:12 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Waynn Lue wrote:
With MySQL, you can change the DB from query to query with
mysql_select_db. The alternative as I stated in my last post is to use
the fully qualified table name (database.table) in your
On Aug 19, 2008, at 4:18 PM, Cox, Chris wrote:
Does anyone know why the unsubscribe email address is bouncing. Are
there any other ways to unsubscribe?
In case you haven't figured it out and you know how to read.
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP General
Are you definately using the correct unsubscribe email? This is the one
given in the message headers:
list-unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ash
www.ashleysheridan.co.uk
---BeginMessage---
On Aug 19, 2008, at 4:18 PM, Cox, Chris wrote:
Does anyone know why the unsubscribe email address is
Does anyone know why the unsubscribe email address is bouncing. Are there any
other ways to unsubscribe?
Chris Cox 415.681.3665 (direct/fax)
Candidate Generation Recruiter
http://www.intuit.com/careers
View Sailen Saha's profile on LinkedIn
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Nathan Nobbe wrote:
im sorry i havent read through all the replies, but i have read
through several of them. i essentially agree w/ Aschwin here.
I'm still having difficulties understanding Aschwins main point, as well
as how you can work (properly) with forms without using a 303 redirect.
Larry Garfield wrote:
True, but bear in mind that the browser has to make a HEAD request for
every such file in order to determine if it needs to download it
again. That's a non-small amount of HTTP traffic if you have a lot of
images or CSS files.
True - although I rarely see HEAD
On 19 Mar 2008, at 09:54, Per Jessen wrote:
Larry Garfield wrote:
True, but bear in mind that the browser has to make a HEAD request
for
every such file in order to determine if it needs to download it
again. That's a non-small amount of HTTP traffic if you have a lot
of
images or CSS
Stut wrote:
On 19 Mar 2008, at 09:54, Per Jessen wrote:
BTW, why does the browser do this for objects it has already cached?
(assuming they're fresh/not expired)
Because by default most web servers don't add expiry headers, so it's
up to the browser.
My server does add expire headers -
On 19 Mar 2008, at 10:11, Per Jessen wrote:
Stut wrote:
On 19 Mar 2008, at 09:54, Per Jessen wrote:
BTW, why does the browser do this for objects it has already cached?
(assuming they're fresh/not expired)
Because by default most web servers don't add expiry headers, so it's
up to the
Aschwin Wesselius wrote:
I've seen form processing being done, when finished it gets a header
redirect to a 'succes' page.
Yes, that's a very typical setup. When the form is processed, you send
a 303 redirect to the Thank you page. That way, if the user hits
the back arrow, he's taken back
Per Jessen wrote:
Yes, that's a very typical setup. When the form is processed, you send
a 303 redirect to the Thank you page. That way, if the user hits
the back arrow, he's taken back to the form URL, not the post URL.
(which would then warn him about re-submitting etc.)
Ok, fine. But why
Quoting Aschwin Wesselius [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Per Jessen wrote:
Yes, that's a very typical setup. When the form is processed, you send
a 303 redirect to the Thank you page. That way, if the user hits
the back arrow, he's taken back to the form URL, not the post URL.
(which would then warn him
On Tuesday 18 March 2008 14:22:26 Aschwin Wesselius wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:
Yes, that's a very typical setup. When the form is processed, you send
a 303 redirect to the Thank you page. That way, if the user hits
the back arrow, he's taken back to the form URL, not the post URL.
(which
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Aschwin Wesselius [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:
Yes, that's a very typical setup. When the form is processed, you send
a 303 redirect to the Thank you page. That way, if the user hits
the back arrow, he's taken back to the form URL, not the
jeffry s wrote:
Requests are reinitialised, libraries
loaded (again), DB connections setup/checked again, session lookups are
being done, log write for another request etc.
i don't see anything wrong with this since that is the way it is. whether
you redirect or
not, the script will do DB
Aschwin Wesselius wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:
Yes, that's a very typical setup. When the form is processed, you
send a 303 redirect to the Thank you page. That way, if the user
hits the back arrow, he's taken back to the form URL, not the post
URL. (which would then warn him about
Aschwin Wesselius wrote:
Ok, let me point it out with an example:
include(this);
include(that);
connect(db);
session check
That is what normally could exist on a script for every page hit.
Yep, that looks common enough.
If you have a page that only does this:
if (GET || POST) {
Aschwin Wesselius wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:
I'm having difficulties following you - a plain 303 redirect to a Thank
you page shouldn't cause all of that. It's an HTTP reply with the 303
and the new URL, followed by a single URL request from the browser.
OK. I think I know how other
Per Jessen wrote:
header(location) mechanisms do come with a very huge disadvantage if
you don't use them with caution. Requests are reinitialised, libraries
loaded (again), DB connections setup/checked again, session lookups
are being done, log write for another request etc. That's quite an
On Mar 18, 2008, at 10:11 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:
My typical setup for a form-page probably looks like this:
if ( $_POST )
{
// do POST processing
header(303 thankyou.html).
exit
}
If I wanted the user back on the same form page, but still with a
Per Jessen wrote:
My typical setup for a form-page probably looks like this:
if ( $_POST )
{
// do POST processing
header(303 thankyou.html).
exit
}
If I wanted the user back on the same form page, but still with a thank
you message, I'd still do a 303, but use
On Mar 18, 2008, at 10:08 AM, Aschwin Wesselius wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:
header(location) mechanisms do come with a very huge disadvantage if
you don't use them with caution. Requests are reinitialised,
libraries
loaded (again), DB connections setup/checked again, session lookups
are
On 18 Mar 2008, at 14:08, Aschwin Wesselius wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:
header(location) mechanisms do come with a very huge disadvantage if
you don't use them with caution. Requests are reinitialised,
libraries
loaded (again), DB connections setup/checked again, session lookups
are being
On 18 Mar 2008, at 14:49, Jason Pruim wrote:
On Mar 18, 2008, at 10:11 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:
My typical setup for a form-page probably looks like this:
if ( $_POST )
{
// do POST processing
header(303 thankyou.html).
exit
}
If I wanted the user back on
Quoting Aschwin Wesselius [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Per Jessen wrote:
header(location) mechanisms do come with a very huge disadvantage if
you don't use them with caution. Requests are reinitialised, libraries
loaded (again), DB connections setup/checked again, session lookups
are being done, log
Stut wrote:
One minor thing... a 303 redirect is permanent. In this situation you
want to use a 302 otherwise you could potentially cause problems with
proxies.
A redirect following a POST really should be a 303 - RFC 2616 :
10.3.4 303 See Other
The response to the request can be found
On 18 Mar 2008, at 15:33, Per Jessen wrote:
Stut wrote:
One minor thing... a 303 redirect is permanent. In this situation you
want to use a 302 otherwise you could potentially cause problems with
proxies.
A redirect following a POST really should be a 303 - RFC 2616 :
10.3.4 303 See Other
im sorry i havent read through all the replies, but i have read through
several of them. i essentially agree w/ Aschwin here. redirects have been
the bane of my existence in several source bases ive worked on. to borrow a
phrase (read in closures article mentioned in another thread) they really
On Tuesday 18 March 2008, Aschwin Wesselius wrote:
Point is: why hitting you webserver with multiple requests per user,
just after submitting a form or whatever caused the redirect? If you
have 2 users per day, that won't hurt. But if you have 30.000 concurrent
users a minute, that could be
On Tuesday 18 March 2008, Jason Pruim wrote:
I don't know much about the actual load stuff... but I do know unless
you specifically set it, the CSS should be cached unless you refresh
it and the date has changed on the file. I assume the same with the
images as well.
True, but bear in mind
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 9:45 PM, Larry Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Take for instance Drupal (which I use as an example because I'm a core dev
for
it).
thats pretty cool.
I will say in general you should not ever have more than one redirect
chained
together. While there may be
Hi!
I have a website where people can upload photos and it creates previews.
My problem is with pictures with big dimensions like 12000px height for
example where the script times out. I've seen other sites that seems do
be able to do this faster. I use gd to scale the image. Is there a
Emil Edeholt wrote:
Hi!
I have a website where people can upload photos and it creates
previews. My problem is with pictures with big dimensions like 12000px
height for example where the script times out. I've seen other sites
that seems do be able to do this faster. I use gd to scale the
On Fri, January 25, 2008 7:27 am, Eric Butera wrote:
I think the memory size can (sort of) be determined by width * height
* bits * channels / 8. I've never found anything better than that.
There are a few comments on the php site in the gd section about such
things but I've never seen it
On Jan 25, 2008 1:39 PM, Richard Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, January 25, 2008 7:27 am, Eric Butera wrote:
I think the memory size can (sort of) be determined by width * height
* bits * channels / 8. I've never found anything better than that.
There are a few comments on the php
On Fri, January 25, 2008 2:43 am, Emil Edeholt wrote:
I have a website where people can upload photos and it creates
previews.
My problem is with pictures with big dimensions like 12000px height
for
example where the script times out. I've seen other sites that seems
do
be able to do this
On Jan 25, 2008 3:43 AM, Emil Edeholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I have a website where people can upload photos and it creates previews.
My problem is with pictures with big dimensions like 12000px height for
example where the script times out. I've seen other sites that seems do
be able
On Fri, January 25, 2008 12:59 pm, Eric Butera wrote:
On Jan 25, 2008 1:39 PM, Richard Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, January 25, 2008 7:27 am, Eric Butera wrote:
I think the memory size can (sort of) be determined by width *
height
* bits * channels / 8. I've never found anything
On Sun, January 20, 2008 5:30 pm, jekillen wrote:
I am developing an application that uses php with Apache.
A user requests a script file from a web site and the server
takes such things as $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDRESS']
You *DO* understand that large-scale ISP's users will change their IP
address
On Jan 20, 2008 8:36 PM, Jochem Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
now for the juicy bit - you have *no* garantee that the system clock and/or
the timezone setting on the client machine is anything like correct. actually
the chances that it is not are quite high - disregarding idiots, just think of
jekillen schreef:
Hello again;
I am developing an application that uses php with Apache.
A user requests a script file from a web site and the server
takes such things as $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDRESS']
$_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDRESS'] is a pretty useless value for the
age old reason that, for instance,
Are you sure that Apache is running and accepting connections to /
~michwill? Does a regular HTML page show up ok?
Yeah, static pages, and regular php pages load fine. It's only when
I bring MySQL into the mix that things go awry.
Have you checked the server error log?
If by server you
-- Forwarded message --
From: Philip W. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2007 15:15:07 -0500
Subject: Writing Binary
Hello Everyone,
I'm trying to write a PHP script that opens a binary file, reads the
binary in chunks, checks those chunks for
Am 2006-08-22 23:05:27, schrieb Colin Guthrie:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't have a clue why my gmail account hasn't started to get traffic. But
it's funny how we get accustomed to the exchange of ideas and cyber-contact
with others. I guess I 'm having some withdrawal. ;-)
Why not use
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't have a clue why my gmail account hasn't started to get traffic. But
it's funny how we get accustomed to the exchange of ideas and cyber-contact
with others. I guess I 'm having some withdrawal. ;-)
Why not use gmane?
I subscribe to the vast majority of my
hi,
any one can help me
i want to generate Pdf file using php.
how can i what tools is required for this.
Regards,
_
Aftab Alam
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 4:06 PM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
I just had a small doubt..Is it possible to write JavaScript through PHP???
On 10/17/05, Aftab Alam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
any one can help me
i want to generate Pdf file using php.
how can i what tools is required for this.
Regards,
_
Aftab Alam
-Original
if you have compiled php with pdflib support, you can do this fairly
easily. see the manual:
http://www.php.net/pdf
Jordan
On Oct 17, 2005, at 6:06 AM, Aftab Alam wrote:
hi,
any one can help me
i want to generate Pdf file using php.
how can i what tools is required for this.
On Mon, October 17, 2005 6:06 am, Aftab Alam wrote:
i want to generate Pdf file using php.
how can i what tools is required for this.
One way is to start here:
http://php.net/pdf
--
Like Music?
http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe,
Richard Lynch said the following on 10/17/05 13:14:
On Mon, October 17, 2005 6:06 am, Aftab Alam wrote:
i want to generate Pdf file using php.
how can i what tools is required for this.
One way is to start here:
http://php.net/pdf
When reading the above link note the last sentence
check out amfphp (opensource php/flash remoting):
http://www.amfphp.org/
good tutorials here:
http://www.sephiroth.it/tutorials.php
AMFPHP allows you to return info from PHP classes as an actionscript
object in flash.
d
On 18-Apr-05, at 1:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Matt Babineau
From: Vivian Steller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are there any thoughts about that in future releases?
What do other developers think about this issue?
How do organize multiple used classnames?
The common answer is: Use a prefix...
but i really dislike using cryptic and long prefixes to ensure
Vivian Steller wrote:
...
Thanks for metioning this issue! This is another point where I think OO is
done the half way in PHP:
Why do we need some implicit type check, like
public method(Type $type)
if we then loose the optional parameter advantage?
I don't know *the* answer. So far as I
From: Vivian Steller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i've a general question concerning PHP's architecture.
Why isn't there a native packaging concept in PHP?
This was also suggested on comp.lang.php, recently (the nested class
thread), called namespaces, but there wasn't a lot of enthusiasm for it.
verffentlicht per Mail versendet
Thanks for your answer!
Terje Sletteb wrote:
From: Vivian Steller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i've a general question concerning PHP's architecture.
Why isn't there a native packaging concept in PHP?
This was also suggested on comp.lang.php, recently (the nested
On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 16:19, lists wrote:
Hi List,
Im wondering what factors are at play in deciding to use require,
include, file_get_contents and such when laying out a site. Like
require() generates a fatal error if the target file doesn't exist. This
means your script will not attempt
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 13:19:37 -0700, lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Im wondering what factors are at play in deciding to use require,
include,
This dictates the level of error reporting you desire when pulling in
a file. On failure, include() won't stop your script execution, while
require()
This is helpful, thanks. But I understand most of the pieces. I'm
interested in efficient and organizational factors to consider in using
them. But after sending this, I thought, maybe my question is more of
a general structural web design question rather than PHP.
I've checked google, (I'm
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:38:21 -0700, lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is helpful, thanks. But I understand most of the pieces. I'm
interested in efficient and organizational factors to consider in using
them. But after sending this, I thought, maybe my question is more of
a general
On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 18:18, Greg Donald wrote:
We use Mojavi, and it works very well:
http://mojavi.org
http://www.peterrobins.co.uk/it/mojavi/tutorial.htm
It's way more than just templates, it's display and logic seperation,
modularization, filter chains, the works. In fact we use
It'll make a small project seem huge in no time flat, but that's the
price you pay for 'organization' and stuff.
But frameworks can also make a huge project seem medium which is the
advantage of organization. Also, it's quite often the case that a small
project grows and slowly becomes a big
* Greg Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
why use one template, or many - why use different pages rather than
relying on variables.
I scoff at template engines like Smarty and frameworks like Mojavi.
But that's just me. I work with both of those technologies everyday
but would never include them
On Oct 12, 2004, at 6:52 PM, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
I haven't had much luck with PHP books when it comes to efficient
coding
techniques and site/application architecture. It's a niche that needs
to
be filled.
Another thing you might want to research is the MVC pattern
Hi List,
My boss recently called PHP good for hobbyists but REAL sites have to
be done with Microsoft technologies. He wants to use Sharepoint for a
wiki type site because of versioning.
Can anyone point me to resources about versioning and inherent
strengths and reliability of PHP?
Hi List,
My boss recently called PHP good for hobbyists but REAL sites have to
be done with Microsoft technologies. He wants to use Sharepoint for a
wiki type site because of versioning.
Can anyone point me to resources about versioning and inherent
strengths and reliability of PHP?
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 11:44:32 -0700, lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My boss recently called PHP good for hobbyists but REAL sites have to
be done with Microsoft technologies. He wants to use Sharepoint for a
wiki type site because of versioning.
Well, I can't dispute a person's opinion as far
My boss recently called PHP good for hobbyists but REAL sites have to
be done with Microsoft technologies. He wants to use Sharepoint for a
wiki type site because of versioning.
:)
real sites use iis
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit:
lists wrote:
Hi List,
My boss recently called PHP good for hobbyists but REAL sites have to
be done with Microsoft technologies. He wants to use Sharepoint for a
wiki type site because of versioning.
Can anyone point me to resources about versioning and inherent strengths
and reliability of
Matthew Sims wrote:
snip
The following sites have been known to use PHP:
snip
www.insight.com (is a publicly traded fortune 1000 company. The site is
90% PHP)
snip
Insight now uses CF. It was a political change, not one agreed on by
the techies.
--
John C. Nichel
ÜberGeek
KegWorks.com
lists wrote:
Hi List,
My boss recently called PHP good for hobbyists but REAL sites have to
be done with Microsoft technologies. He wants to use Sharepoint for a
wiki type site because of versioning.
Can anyone point me to resources about versioning and inherent strengths
and reliability
Oh please. Not even as a joke.
On 7 Oct 2004, at 21:07, Matt M. wrote:
My boss recently called PHP good for hobbyists but REAL sites have
to
be done with Microsoft technologies. He wants to use Sharepoint for a
wiki type site because of versioning.
:)
real sites use iis
--
PHP General Mailing
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 15:16:51 -0400, John Nichel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Insight now uses CF. It was a political change, not one agreed on by
the techies.
I don't know much about CF at all. Was it because of the shopping
cart capabilities of CF? I read somewhere that was a top reason to
use
1 - 100 of 198 matches
Mail list logo
