bruce wrote:
> interesting points regarding college and programming..
>
> my degrees bsee/msee covered alot more than pure programing.. as a double
> ee/cs, the ability to articulate an issue/problem, and bring to mind a cogent
> thought process was valuable. the ability to understand how differ
: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: RE: [PHP] while-question
> Dabbling?
>
> I think that making a living from it isn't dabbling, so I may not be
> qualified to speak for the dabblers.
>
> But for me, I was writing code before there were such courses. Later,
> when
On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 10:52 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 18:01 -0500, Craige Leeder wrote:
> >> Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 17:47 -0500, Craige Leeder wrote:
> >>>
> Only thing to note with the foreach is that you are
On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 14:33 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Craige Leeder wrote:
> > Jochem Maas wrote:
> >> klieder ... kliederen
> >>
> >> the E sound is short.
> >>
> >>
> > Interesting to know. Thanks :D
> >
> > - Craige
>
> don't believe him, "jochem" is really called Bob Davis, a slightly
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Nathan Rixham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Craige Leeder wrote:
>
>> Jochem Maas wrote:
>>
>>> klieder ... kliederen
>>>
>>> the E sound is short.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Interesting to know. Thanks :D
>>
>> - Craige
>>
>
> don't believe him, "jochem" is really called Bob D
Craige Leeder wrote:
Jochem Maas wrote:
klieder ... kliederen
the E sound is short.
Interesting to know. Thanks :D
- Craige
don't believe him, "jochem" is really called Bob Davis, a slightly
balding middle aged ASP developer from hull sent to infiltrate the PHP
community and misguide
Jochem Maas wrote:
klieder ... kliederen
the E sound is short.
Interesting to know. Thanks :D
- Craige
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Craige Leeder schreef:
> Jochem Maas wrote:
>> just for laughs .. given the 'dabble' thread "Cleeder" is phonetically
>> very very close to a dutch word meaning 'messing around' .. rather in
>> the way
>> a 2yo might mess around with a bowl of yogurt.
>>
> Haha, now that does make me laugh. Out
Jochem Maas wrote:
just for laughs .. given the 'dabble' thread "Cleeder" is phonetically
very very close to a dutch word meaning 'messing around' .. rather in the way
a 2yo might mess around with a bowl of yogurt.
Haha, now that does make me laugh. Out of curiosity, what is the actual
word f
tedd wrote:
At 7:02 PM -0500 11/17/08, Craige Leeder wrote:
I'm not illiterate; promise :p
- Craige
Yeah, his parents were married before he was born.
Cheers,
tedd
omg tedd, I was just reading this thread over, thought exactly that
witty response, clicked you're reply and there it is;
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 18:01 -0500, Craige Leeder wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 17:47 -0500, Craige Leeder wrote:
Only thing to note with the foreach is that you are actually working on
a copy of the array, so if you intend to modify it, pass it b
Craige Leeder schreef:
> Jochem Maas wrote:
>> must . resist
>>
>> "I take you didn't score to hig on the spelling test? and collage,
>> is that the the cut-n-paste school of IT?"
>>
>> dang it, failed. ;-)
>>
>
>
> Haha! 'high' was just my 'h' key not pressing, and college is j
tedd schreef:
> At 12:52 AM +0100 11/18/08, Jochem Maas wrote:
>> Craige Leeder schreef:
>> > I'm 100% self taught for now. I'm just out of higschool, and hopefully
>>> going off to collage next year.
>>
>> must . resist
>>
>> "I take you didn't score to hig on the spelling test? and co
Jay Blanchard wrote:
> [snip]
> ...foreach...
> [/snip]
>
> You could also use a for loop if you wanted to count;
>
> for($i = 0; $i < count($array); $i++){
>echo $i . "\n";
> }
>
>
>
This is not good because you are calling count every loop iteration.
Thank you,
Micah Gersten
onShore Netw
At 7:02 PM -0500 11/17/08, Craige Leeder wrote:
I'm not illiterate; promise :p
- Craige
Yeah, his parents were married before he was born.
Cheers,
tedd
--
---
http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To u
At 12:52 AM +0100 11/18/08, Jochem Maas wrote:
Craige Leeder schreef:
> I'm 100% self taught for now. I'm just out of higschool, and hopefully
going off to collage next year.
must . resist
"I take you didn't score to hig on the spelling test? and collage,
is that the the cut-n-pas
Craige Leeder schreef:
> Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>> On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 17:47 -0500, Craige Leeder wrote:
>>
>>> Only thing to note with the foreach is that you are actually working
>>> on a copy of the array, so if you intend to modify it, pass it by
>>> reference.
>>>
>>> - Craige
>>>
>>
Jochem Maas wrote:
must . resist
"I take you didn't score to hig on the spelling test? and collage,
is that the the cut-n-paste school of IT?"
dang it, failed. ;-)
Haha! 'high' was just my 'h' key not pressing, and college is just one
of those words I have trouble with.
tedd schreef:
> At 10:00 AM -0800 11/17/08, bruce wrote:
>> curious qiestion
>>
>> to all on here who dabble in php... how many of you have actully gone to
>> college, taken algorithm courses, microprocessor courses,
>> design/architecture courses, etc..
>>
>> or is the majority of the work her
Craige Leeder schreef:
> bruce wrote:
>> curious qiestion
>>
>> to all on here who dabble in php... how many of you have actully gone to
>> college, taken algorithm courses, microprocessor courses,
>> design/architecture courses, etc..
>>
>> or is the majority of the work here from people who'v
bruce wrote:
curious qiestion
to all on here who dabble in php... how many of you have actully gone to
college, taken algorithm courses, microprocessor courses,
design/architecture courses, etc..
or is the majority of the work here from people who've grabbed the tools and
started programmin
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 18:01 -0500, Craige Leeder wrote:
> Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 17:47 -0500, Craige Leeder wrote:
> >
> >> Only thing to note with the foreach is that you are actually working on
> >> a copy of the array, so if you intend to modify it, pass it by refer
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 17:47 -0500, Craige Leeder wrote:
Only thing to note with the foreach is that you are actually working on
a copy of the array, so if you intend to modify it, pass it by reference.
- Craige
Can you do that? I assume it would look like this:
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 17:47 -0500, Craige Leeder wrote:
> Alain Roger wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > i'm on PHP training and our lector is telling us that to avoid counting an
> > array item amout thanks count($my_array), he tells we can do:
> > while($my_array)
> > {
> > ... do something
> > }
> > but fr
Alain Roger wrote:
Hi,
i'm on PHP training and our lector is telling us that to avoid counting an
array item amout thanks count($my_array), he tells we can do:
while($my_array)
{
... do something
}
but from experience this is an infinity loop...
it should be always something like
$count = coun
At 2:55 PM -0500 11/17/08, Wolf wrote:
Tedd, glad you got hooked on Phonics. One of these days I hope from
graduating from just looking at the pictures, but right now the
pictures are oh so enticing!. ;)
Wolf
Wolf:
Lot's of exciting things -- hard to keep up on bots, automated
buying, da
> Dabbling?
>
> I think that making a living from it isn't dabbling, so I may not be
> qualified to speak for the dabblers.
>
> But for me, I was writing code before there were such courses. Later,
> when I went to college I was taught adventures in keypunching and
> received several "next to
At 10:00 AM -0800 11/17/08, bruce wrote:
curious qiestion
to all on here who dabble in php... how many of you have actully gone to
college, taken algorithm courses, microprocessor courses,
design/architecture courses, etc..
or is the majority of the work here from people who've grabbed the
bruce wrote:
curious qiestion
to all on here who dabble in php... how many of you have actully gone to
college, taken algorithm courses, microprocessor courses,
design/architecture courses, etc..
or is the majority of the work here from people who've grabbed the tools and
started programmin
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 19:07 +0100, Jochem Maas wrote:
> Robert Cummings schreef:
> > On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 14:54 +, Stut wrote:
> >> On 17 Nov 2008, at 14:31, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> >>> if you really want a challenge try this one..
> >>>
> >>> task: add the numbers 5 and 17 together, using php,
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 10:00 -0800, bruce wrote:
> curious qiestion
>
> to all on here who dabble in php... how many of you have actully gone to
> college, taken algorithm courses, microprocessor courses,
> design/architecture courses, etc..
>
> or is the majority of the work here from people
Robert Cummings schreef:
> On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 14:54 +, Stut wrote:
>> On 17 Nov 2008, at 14:31, Nathan Rixham wrote:
>>> if you really want a challenge try this one..
>>>
>>> task: add the numbers 5 and 17 together, using php, without using
>>> the + operator. fill it in:
>>>
>>> function
mming... ?
-Original Message-
From: Robert Cummings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 9:53 AM
To: Stut
Cc: Nathan Rixham; php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] while-question
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 14:54 +, Stut wrote:
> On 17 Nov 2008, at 14:31, Nathan Rixh
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 14:54 +, Stut wrote:
> On 17 Nov 2008, at 14:31, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> > if you really want a challenge try this one..
> >
> > task: add the numbers 5 and 17 together, using php, without using
> > the + operator. fill it in:
> >
> > function add($a , $b) {
> > //code he
Stut wrote:
On 17 Nov 2008, at 14:31, Nathan Rixham wrote:
if you really want a challenge try this one..
task: add the numbers 5 and 17 together, using php, without using the
+ operator. fill it in:
function add($a , $b) {
//code here but no + - / * operators
return $answer;
}
echo add(5, 1
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nathan Rixham schreef:
>> Jochem Maas wrote:
>>> $a = range(1,10);
>>> for ($i = 0, $c = count($a); $i < $c; print($a[$i]."\n"), $i++);
>>
>> think the point of this is to count the items in an array without count
>> mate :p
On 17 Nov 2008, at 14:31, Nathan Rixham wrote:
if you really want a challenge try this one..
task: add the numbers 5 and 17 together, using php, without using
the + operator. fill it in:
function add($a , $b) {
//code here but no + - / * operators
return $answer;
}
echo add(5, 17);
Elemen
Nathan Rixham schreef:
> Jochem Maas wrote:
>> $a = range(1,10);
>> for ($i = 0, $c = count($a); $i < $c; print($a[$i]."\n"), $i++);
>
> think the point of this is to count the items in an array without count
> mate :p no point in the above you could just:
> $c = count($a);
I thought the point wa
Jochem Maas wrote:
$a = range(1,10);
for ($i = 0, $c = count($a); $i < $c; print($a[$i]."\n"), $i++);
think the point of this is to count the items in an array without count
mate :p no point in the above you could just:
$c = count($a);
foreach!
$a = range(1,10);
$c = 0;
foreach($a as $b) {
Timo Erbach schreef:
> ...but for best performance you should do:
>
>
> $counter = count($array);
> for($i = 0; $i < $counter; $i++){
> echo $i . "\n";
> }
just for fun:
$a = range(1,10);
for ($i = 0, $c = count($a); $i < $c; print($a[$i]."\n"), $i++);
... gives an idea of the power and flex
[snip]
...foreach...
[/snip]
You could also use a for loop if you wanted to count;
for($i = 0; $i < count($array); $i++){
echo $i . "\n";
}
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi,
i'm on PHP training and our lector is telling us that to avoid counting an
array item amout thanks count($my_array), he tells we can do:
while($my_array)
{
... do something
}
but from experience this is an infinity loop...
it should be always something like
$count = count($my_array);
whil
On 17 Nov 2008, at 13:01, Alain Roger wrote:
i'm on PHP training and our lector is telling us that to avoid
counting an
array item amout thanks count($my_array), he tells we can do:
while($my_array)
{
... do something
}
but from experience this is an infinity loop...
it should be always someth
43 matches
Mail list logo
