On Jan 10, 2008, at 8:00 PM, Arlen Christian Mart Cuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi there,
Why is it that if I try to evaluate an index of an array returned by a
function immediately, a syntax error is produced? (unexpected '[',
expecting ',' or ';')
Thanks,
Arlen.
I've run into this
On Jan 10, 2008 11:00 PM, Arlen Christian Mart Cuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi there,
Why is it that if I try to evaluate an index of an array returned by a
function immediately, a syntax error is produced? (unexpected '[',
expecting ',' or ';')
thats hillarious, i literally brought this
Nathan Nobbe wrote:
On Jan 10, 2008 11:00 PM, Arlen Christian Mart Cuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi there,
Why is it that if I try to evaluate an index of an array returned by a
function immediately, a syntax error is produced? (unexpected '[',
expecting ',' or ';')
thats hillarious, i
On Jan 11, 2008 12:25 AM, Jim Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, make all your functions return objects, and have the object have a
method called get or index or something like that that returns the index
requested. :)
Better yet, make everything an object: String, Numeric, Array, etc
i
On 31/12/2007, Mary Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in my select scrolling list?
Here is the offending code (abbreviated)
select name=sr_location_id class= size=10
option value='94' Italy/option
option value='97' selectedJapan/option
option value='252' Jersey/option
option value='294'
FireFox may be remembering whatever you last selected.
That's a browser feature you have to live with.
Move along, nothing to see here :-)
On Sun, December 30, 2007 9:46 pm, Mary Anderson wrote:
in my select scrolling list?
Here is the offending code (abbreviated)
select name=sr_location_id
On Dec 30, 2007 10:46 PM, Mary Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in my select scrolling list?
Here is the offending code (abbreviated)
select name=sr_location_id class= size=10
option value='94' Italy/option
option value='97' selectedJapan/option
option value='252' Jersey/option
option
It sounds to me like the allowed memory size went back to the default
after they upgraded php.
I usually have to update some of my config files after an upgrade. Nothing
seems strange to me here... But maybe I am missing something.
I'm going to edit php.ini though what if client doesn't have
Richard Lynch wrote:
On Thu, December 20, 2007 11:37 am, afan pasalic wrote:
The hosting company I have one account (and several Add Domains)
upgraded php on the server from 4.4.7 to 5.2.5. After the upgrade I
start getting the error message:
Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 8388608 bytes
Stephen Johnson wrote:
It sounds to me like the allowed memory size went back to the default
after they upgraded php.
I usually have to update some of my config files after an upgrade. Nothing
seems strange to me here... But maybe I am missing something.
I'm going to edit php.ini
On Thu, December 20, 2007 11:37 am, afan pasalic wrote:
The hosting company I have one account (and several Add Domains)
upgraded php on the server from 4.4.7 to 5.2.5. After the upgrade I
start getting the error message:
Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 8388608 bytes exhausted (tried to
On 10/17/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I put some thing in an form input filed like this:
' \
then submit to a php script.
When use $_GET / $_POST / $_REQUEST to get the value,
I always get:
\' \ \\
In php expression it should be:
$_REQUEST['field'] = \\' \\\ ;
Any
General
php-general@lists.php.net
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 3:20 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP] Why not user...?
On Mon, August 27, 2007 8:51 am, Stut wrote:
Gustav Wiberg wrote:
Why is it so that I get this error. I'm using Windows Integrated
authorization-method for actual webb I'm testing
[snip]
Yes, a single sign-on it is... It doesn't work together with Windows
(and
PHP) you mean?
[/snip]
No, not really.
You can run PHP on a Linux or a Windows server and it does not have
access to the initial login values (press cntl alt del to login)
although ASP and .Net (auth_user, etc) do.
On 8/28/07, Jay Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since PHP cannot read registry settings (neither can JavaScript) on the
client that is out. Windows is aware of the logged in user, but exactly
where that 'session' information is kept is a mystery to most of us. So
PHP cannot be aware of a
[snip]
i know there is an apache NTLM(1) module for this. i don't believe it
requires anything other than a connection to a domain authentication
server and the ability to send headers and read the reply
(challenge/response) - i don't think the registry is needed at all on
the client or the
Jay Blanchard wrote:
[snip]
i know there is an apache NTLM(1) module for this. i don't believe it
requires anything other than a connection to a domain authentication
server and the ability to send headers and read the reply
(challenge/response) - i don't think the registry is needed at all on
On 8/28/07, Stut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In addition the OP is running IIS so this is all kinda less than helpful
to him.
yeah, i didn't say this would, but it should be able to be ported to a
PHP module by someone i would think. i mean if someone can do it in
Perl or C (especially C) why
On 8/28/07, mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/28/07, Stut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In addition the OP is running IIS so this is all kinda less than helpful
to him.
yeah, i didn't say this would, but it should be able to be ported to a
PHP module by someone i would think. i mean if
On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 09:56 +0200, Gustav Wiberg wrote:
Hi!
Why is it so that I get this error. I'm using Windows Integrated
authorization-method for actual webb I'm testing on.
Notice: Undefined index: PHP_AUTH_USER in C:\www\utveckling\username.php on
line 2
Because on line 2 of
[snip]
Why is it so that I get this error. I'm using Windows Integrated
authorization-method for actual webb I'm testing on.
Notice: Undefined index: PHP_AUTH_USER in C:\www\utveckling\username.php
on
line 2
[/snip]
Hmm, can only take a guess since we do not see what sets PHP_AUTH_USER,
but
Gustav Wiberg wrote:
Why is it so that I get this error. I'm using Windows Integrated
authorization-method for actual webb I'm testing on.
Notice: Undefined index: PHP_AUTH_USER in C:\www\utveckling\username.php
on line 2
For some reason it's not getting set. This could be because you've
27, 2007 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP] Why not user...?
Gustav Wiberg wrote:
Why is it so that I get this error. I'm using Windows Integrated
authorization-method for actual webb I'm testing on.
Notice: Undefined index: PHP_AUTH_USER in C:\www\utveckling\username.php
on line 2
For some reason
Gustav Wiberg wrote:
I can't figure the thing with Windows Integrated authentication... I
have checked a website for doing this. I still have to enter username
and password even if I'm on the local computer (through a VPN though)
This would be the same as using computer locally on the network,
, 2007 8:51 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP] why?
Gustav Wiberg wrote:
I can't figure the thing with Windows Integrated authentication... I have
checked a website for doing this. I still have to enter username and
password even if I'm on the local computer (through a VPN though) This
would be the same
, 2007 8:51 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP] why?
Gustav Wiberg wrote:
I can't figure the thing with Windows Integrated authentication... I
have checked a website for doing this. I still have to enter username
and password even if I'm on the local computer (through a VPN though)
This would be the same
Hi!
Ok. Of course Why didn't I think of that? Thanx! :-)
Best regards
/Gustav Wiberg
- Original Message -
From: Stut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gustav Wiberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: PHP General php-general@lists.php.net
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 8:59 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP] why
[snip]
I can't figure the thing with Windows Integrated authentication... I
have
checked a website for doing this. I still have to enter username and
password even if I'm on the local computer (through a VPN though) This
would
be the same as using computer locally on the network, but I have to
[snip]
... be the same as using computer locally on the network, but I have
to
enter username and password. I'm sure I have checked the Windows
Integreated authenication - checkbox for the website it's about.
When I have entered username and password I can go on and do whatever I
want on that
On 8/27/07, Jay Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you trying to do single sign-on? This would be one of the holy
grails of the PHP on Linux, Windows clients operations. This is
available with .Net and with legacy ASP/Jscript apps but not with
PHPeven on windows
there's an apache
On Mon, August 27, 2007 8:51 am, Stut wrote:
Gustav Wiberg wrote:
Why is it so that I get this error. I'm using Windows Integrated
authorization-method for actual webb I'm testing on.
Notice: Undefined index: PHP_AUTH_USER in
C:\www\utveckling\username.php
on line 2
For some reason it's
@lists.php.net
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 9:26 PM
Subject: RE: [PHP] why?
[snip]
... be the same as using computer locally on the network, but I have
to
enter username and password. I'm sure I have checked the Windows
Integreated authenication - checkbox for the website it's about.
When I have
Jason Pruim wrote:
Yes I am hijacking a thread just to screw with all the people who use
threaded e-mail viewers and because I'm mean like that :P
Figured since yall have to much time on your hands anyway I'd give you
something else to gripe about... :)
Now... My question :)
?php
$mysqli =
On 8/7/07, Jason Pruim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes I am hijacking a thread just to screw with all the people who use
threaded e-mail viewers and because I'm mean like that :P
Figured since yall have to much time on your hands anyway I'd give
you something else to gripe about... :)
Now...
Hello,
I suspect that you need to assign the new instance of mysqli to $mysqli
by reference to prevent the on-demand instance that is created by new
from being copied (cloned) at the point of assignment.
Mark
Jason Pruim wrote:
Yes I am hijacking a thread just to screw with all the people who
On Aug 7, 2007, at 11:46 AM, Daniel Brown wrote:
As far as I know, J (and I could be wrong on this), this is
actually a problem with PHP5. Some things that you could try,
however:
In your php.ini file, set:
zend.ze1_compatibility_mode = Off
Hey Dan,
That did the trick on
[snip]
Yes I am hijacking a thread just to screw with all the people who use
threaded e-mail viewers and because I'm mean like that :P
[/snip]
To answer your question, because hijacking threads is much harder than
typing the e-mail address in the To box, Duh.
--
PHP General Mailing List
On Fri, May 4, 2007 9:44 pm, Victor wrote:
?php
$doc = domxml_new_doc(1.0);
var_dump($doc);
$node = $doc-create_element(para);
var_dump($node);
$newnode = $doc-append_child($node);
var_dump($newnode);
$newnode-set_attribute(align, left);
?
I just run the example that is from php
On 5/5/07, Victor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
?php
$doc = domxml_new_doc(1.0);
$node = $doc-create_element(para);
$newnode = $doc-append_child($node);
$newnode-set_attribute(align, left);
?
I just run the example that is from php manual. But there is some error
The characters are encoded in octal and the php interpreter converts them
into the corresponding ASCII characters and then the sequence is represented
as a string which is included?
On Fri, May 4, 2007 3:24 am, Arno Kuhl wrote:
I recently came across a script that was oddly encoded. A bit of
digging
revealed it was encoded in octal. What puzzles me is why the php
interpreter
is able to understand the script.
An example (not from the original script)
require_once
On Sun, April 22, 2007 5:47 pm, H.T wrote:
I get this error message when i try to check my site on localhost
running
IIS and PHP 5.1.2 :
Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 8388608 bytes exhausted (tried to
allocate 24576 bytes) in ...
and it points to the line which is pure html code!
On Apr 22, 2007, at 5:47 PM, H.T wrote:
I get this error message when i try to check my site on localhost
running
IIS and PHP 5.1.2 :
Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 8388608 bytes exhausted (tried to
allocate 24576 bytes) in ...
and it points to the line which is pure html code!
What
Could you also send the code? Maybe 5 lines before and 5 lines after the
line it is pointing to?
It also means it tried to allocate 2KB of memory, which put you over
your 8MB in whatever script you are running. You can set the maximum
amount of memory a PHP script can use in your PHP.ini file.
Chris wrote:
Richard Lynch wrote:
On Tue, April 17, 2007 4:01 pm, Chris wrote:
Tijnema ! wrote:
On 4/17/07, Brian Dunning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dang. There is no remote access to the server, no way to remotely
edit php.ini - everything is blocked by the firewall. It's running
IIS not
We finally got it resolved by editing php.ini. This was classic: A
clueless office assistant did it, talked through step-by-step over a
cell phone, while an armed security guard accompanied her into their
server room.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit:
On 4/18/07, Brian Dunning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We finally got it resolved by editing php.ini. This was classic: A
clueless office assistant did it, talked through step-by-step over a
cell phone, while an armed security guard accompanied her into their
server room.
LOL. Never heard of
On Wed, April 18, 2007 10:07 am, Brian Dunning wrote:
We finally got it resolved by editing php.ini. This was classic: A
clueless office assistant did it, talked through step-by-step over a
cell phone, while an armed security guard accompanied her into their
server room.
I knew a guy one time
Brian Dunning wrote:
If I do this:
ini_set('upload_max_filesize', 30720);
echo ini_get('upload_max_filesize');
it returns 2M. Why is it not accepting the ini_set? The server is
Windows, PHP 5.2.
probably because upload_max_filesize is PHP_INI_PERDIR not PHP_INI_ALL
use:
Dang. There is no remote access to the server, no way to remotely
edit php.ini - everything is blocked by the firewall. It's running
IIS not Apache.
On Apr 17, 2007, at 1:40 PM, Daniel Brown wrote:
That particular variable is a PHP_INI_SYSTEM variable, which
means it can only be
On Tue, April 17, 2007 3:43 pm, Sebe wrote:
Brian Dunning wrote:
If I do this:
ini_set('upload_max_filesize', 30720);
echo ini_get('upload_max_filesize');
it returns 2M. Why is it not accepting the ini_set? The server is
Windows, PHP 5.2.
probably because upload_max_filesize is
On 4/17/07, Brian Dunning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dang. There is no remote access to the server, no way to remotely
edit php.ini - everything is blocked by the firewall. It's running
IIS not Apache.
I'm not totaly sure about IIS, i never use it, but PHP_INI_PERDIR can
also be set in .htaccess
Tijnema ! wrote:
On 4/17/07, Brian Dunning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dang. There is no remote access to the server, no way to remotely
edit php.ini - everything is blocked by the firewall. It's running
IIS not Apache.
I'm not totaly sure about IIS, i never use it, but PHP_INI_PERDIR can
also
Talk to your webhost.
Nobody here can do anything useful for you on this...
Other than to recommend abandoning your current host for a better one.
:-)
On Tue, April 17, 2007 3:46 pm, Brian Dunning wrote:
Dang. There is no remote access to the server, no way to remotely
edit php.ini -
On Tue, April 17, 2007 4:01 pm, Chris wrote:
Tijnema ! wrote:
On 4/17/07, Brian Dunning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dang. There is no remote access to the server, no way to remotely
edit php.ini - everything is blocked by the firewall. It's running
IIS not Apache.
I'm not totaly sure about
Richard Lynch wrote:
On Tue, April 17, 2007 4:01 pm, Chris wrote:
Tijnema ! wrote:
On 4/17/07, Brian Dunning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dang. There is no remote access to the server, no way to remotely
edit php.ini - everything is blocked by the firewall. It's running
IIS not Apache.
I'm not
It's PHP_INI_PERDIR, but php takes the MINIMUM(php.ini, .htaccess,
FORM:MAX_FILE_UPLOAD_SIZE_THINGIE)
So it's no less secure than the webhost/sysadmin chooses to make it.
Or, at least, that's how I understood it to work when I tested it ages
ago...
No promise it hasn't changed.
On Tue, April
On 4/3/07, Chris W. Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have a form page and a processing page. After submitting the form the
processing page does whatever it needs to do (insert a record, send back
validation errors, etc.) After determing what to do it always redirects
somewhere with
I've seen this a lot with IE, it even warns you about it, the warning from
IE is:
The page cannot be refreshed without resending the information. Click Retry
to send the information again, or click Cancel to return to the page that
you were trying to view.
And through all my days, when you click
On Tuesday, April 03, 2007 11:44 AM Tijnema ! mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
This is the only behavior i know of, a refresh action does the same
action he did for loading the current page again. If you submit data
to that page, it will resubmit the data. If you're using the
Location:URL
Hi Chris,
But sometimes when I'm back at the form page (after the redirect)
and I refresh the page it does the previous page's actions again.
Can you provide a raw HTTP dump of the complete scenario?
Chris
--
Chris Shiflett
http://shiflett.org/
--
PHP General Mailing List
Tijnema wrote:
If you're using the Location:URL header entry, the browser doesn't
saves this action as an action did by the browser itself, and so
it will submit the data to the page where you redirect.
Either you misunderstood his question, or you misunderstand what
header('Location: ...')
On Tuesday, April 03, 2007 12:35 PM Chris Shiflett
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
But sometimes when I'm back at the form page (after the redirect)
and I refresh the page it does the previous page's actions again.
Can you provide a raw HTTP dump of the complete scenario?
Two things:
1. How
Can you provide a raw HTTP dump of the complete scenario?
Two things:
1. How do I do that?
Probably the easiest thing to do these days is use a Firefox extension
like Firebug or LiveHTTPHeaders.
Chris
--
Chris Shiflett
http://shiflett.org/
--
PHP General Mailing List
From: Richard Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, March 11, 2007 11:24 am, Mike Shanley wrote:
I am just not understanding what I could have possibly done wrong with
this query. All of the variables are good, without special characters
in
any sense of the word... So why isn't it importing
On Thu, March 8, 2007 4:57 am, Ross wrote:
Can someone explain to me why this used to work but then stopped
header(Content-length: $size);
header(Content-type: $type);
header(Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=$name);
and this now works
header(Content-length: .$size);
On 3/11/07, Mike Shanley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am just not understanding what I could have possibly done wrong with
this query. All of the variables are good, without special characters in
any sense of the word... So why isn't it importing anything?
Thanks!
$q = INSERT INTO
Tijnema ! wrote:
On 3/11/07, Mike Shanley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am just not understanding what I could have possibly done wrong with
this query. All of the variables are good, without special characters in
any sense of the word... So why isn't it importing anything?
Thanks!
$q
Jochem Maas wrote:
Tijnema ! wrote:
On 3/11/07, Mike Shanley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am just not understanding what I could have possibly done wrong with
this query. All of the variables are good, without special characters in
any sense of the word... So why isn't it importing
Ross wrote:
Can someone explain to me why this used to work but then stopped
header(Content-length: $size);
header(Content-type: $type);
header(Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=$name);
and this now works
header(Content-length: .$size);
header(Content-type: .$type);
concatenation changes?? I've noticed this too, you can either do what you
did, or put {} around variable within quotes..
- Original Message -
From: Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 4:57 AM
Subject: [PHP] why did it stop working?
On 3/8/07, Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone explain to me why this used to work but then stopped
header(Content-length: $size);
header(Content-type: $type);
header(Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=$name);
and this now works
header(Content-length: .$size);
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2006-11-03 15:15:55 -0600:
On Fri, November 3, 2006 12:45 am, John.H wrote:
My php program whose owner is root:
That has absolutely no influence on what user the process *runs* as.
?
mkdir('test',0777);
?
and the folder 'test' 's owner is 'nobody'?
You're
On Thu, November 2, 2006 3:01 pm, Alan Milnes wrote:
Robin Vickery wrote:
include(http://www.squareinch.net/include/misc.inc;);
Don't call files .inc - call them .inc.php if you really must have the
inc somewhere, that way the Web Server will actually treat it as a php
file and not display
Richard Lynch wrote:
On Thu, November 2, 2006 3:01 pm, Alan Milnes wrote:
Don't call files .inc - call them .inc.php if you really must have the
inc somewhere, that way the Web Server will actually treat it as a php
file and not display your details to the world if accessed directly.
On Fri, November 3, 2006 12:45 am, John.H wrote:
My php program whose owner is root:
?
mkdir('test',0777);
?
and the folder 'test' 's owner is 'nobody'?
why?should the folder belong to 'root' too?
By the way,the safe mode is turned on.
I believe that the umask and other OS settings
On Fri, November 3, 2006 1:12 pm, Jon Anderson wrote:
Or you can .htaccess Deny From All them out... That's my preferred
solution. It keeps the include tree near the code that accompanies it
without risking anything even if they're called *.php.
Until you upgrade Apache and forget to enable
Richard Lynch wrote:
On Fri, November 3, 2006 1:12 pm, Jon Anderson wrote:
Or you can .htaccess Deny From All them out... That's my preferred
solution. It keeps the include tree near the code that accompanies it
without risking anything even if they're called *.php.
Until you upgrade
Mel wrote:
Your advice is well taken and thank you.
I do have a book with the help of which I made this site and I have been
working on it for many many weeks. (ashamed to say exactly how many!)
Remember your first ever php site?
Yep, it was for a Fortune 500 company, but that's not the
At 4:00 PM -0800 11/1/06, Mel wrote:
I am sure there are things even you don't know or understand
Hey, that's not the first time I've heard that -- who's spreading
that rumor? The subject line is not directed at me, is it? :-)
As I think Will Rogers once said We're all ignorant, only in
Robin Vickery wrote:
include(http://www.squareinch.net/include/misc.inc;);
Don't call files .inc - call them .inc.php if you really must have the
inc somewhere, that way the Web Server will actually treat it as a php
file and not display your details to the world if accessed directly.
Alan
Better still, keep them outside the docroot. If you do insist on having them
inside and insist on calling them *.inc, create an .htaccess file that stops
download of *.inc files.
Thank you both so much. I did change the name. I was chocked to see
all my passwords displayed in the browser!
On Nov 2, 2006, at 1:15 PM, Dave Goodchild wrote:
Better still, keep them outside the docroot. If you do insist on
having them
inside and insist on calling them *.inc, create an
John.H wrote:
My php program whose owner is root:
?
mkdir('test',0777);
?
and the folder 'test' 's owner is 'nobody'?
why?should the folder belong to 'root' too?
By the way,the safe mode is turned on.
If you're running this through your webserver, then the webserver is
actually
Mel wrote:
I do have a book with the help of which I made this site and I have been
working on it for many many weeks. (ashamed to say exactly how many!)
Remember your first ever php site?
No
I am sure there are things even you don't know or understand and that
you can use help from other
Bad day?
/frank
1 nov 2006 kl. 09.55 skrev Mel:
Could you think of why my site loads so slowly?
http://www.squareinch.net/home.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 00:55 -0800, Mel wrote:
Could you think of why my site loads so slowly?
http://www.squareinch.net/home.php
That's a bit like asking us to read your mind. We'd only be guessing
since we can't see your code and you haven't told us what your site
does.
What I can say is
So do you mean that's it is ok and not slow?
On Nov 1, 2006, at 1:09 AM, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 00:55 -0800, Mel wrote:
Could you think of why my site loads so slowly?
http://www.squareinch.net/home.php
That's a bit like asking us to read your mind. We'd only be
This is my first php site and I have no idea where to look for a reason!
On Nov 1, 2006, at 1:07 AM, Frank Arensmeier wrote:
Bad day?
/frank
1 nov 2006 kl. 09.55 skrev Mel:
Could you think of why my site loads so slowly?
http://www.squareinch.net/home.php
--
PHP General Mailing List
Maybe it's the 18 k of JavaScript from Google that slows your page
down? Why not load this script locally from your server?
/frank
1 nov 2006 kl. 10.26 skrev Mel:
So do you mean that's it is ok and not slow?
On Nov 1, 2006, at 1:09 AM, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 00:55
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 01:26 -0800, Mel wrote:
So do you mean that's it is ok and not slow?
I'm saying we can't ascertain why it's so slow since we don't have
enough information.
Cheers,
Rob.
--
..
| InterJinn Application Framework -
My suggestion: stripp out the JS from Google. Test you page again.
Should the page load as slowly as before, it might have to do with
PHP. Then, give us more details about your script)
/frank
1 nov 2006 kl. 10.53 skrev Robert Cummings:
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 01:26 -0800, Mel wrote:
So do
I took the Google stuff out. I can't tell if it's faster now.
I don't think it's very consistent. Sometimes it loads pretty fast
and sometimes it gets stuck in the right corner!
I don't think I have seen this happen with any other site!
On Nov 1, 2006, at 2:12 AM, Frank Arensmeier wrote:
My
as well...
/frank
Vidarebefordrat brev:
Från: Toby Osbourn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Datum: onsdag 1 nov 2006 10.57.17 GMT+01:00
Till: Frank Arensmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ämne: Re: [PHP] why so slow?
Yeah it will be that hit counter or whatever it is you are trying
to load - I had one myself that used
Frank Arensmeier wrote:
My suggestion: stripp out the JS from Google. Test you page again.
Should the page load as slowly as before, it might have to do with
PHP. Then, give us more details about your script)
/frank
1 nov 2006 kl. 10.53 skrev Robert Cummings:
On Wed,
Why do you have html tags before your doctype declaration?
Anyway, I am not sure if your problem has to do with PHP after all.
Again, if you think that it is related to PHP, show us some code.
There are still other things to consider (server, external files, CSS
- neither of those things
On 01/11/06, Mel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is the code for a testing page: http://www.squareinch.net/
client_testing.php?art=btw_logo.jpg
I am sure it is a mess since it is my first!!!
[]
include(http://www.squareinch.net/include/misc.inc;);
Don't do that - publishing your
On 01/11/06, Mel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you so much.
Yes, I was afraid of putting my passwords...
I can move the include file outside the directory, but what do you
mean by include the file directly
Please respond to the list
What I meant was to do this:
ok
I have fixed my html and include
http://www.squareinch.net/client_testing_html401.php
could you please help me figure out how to change the query in box 4
so that it shows the url only when the link is active?
On Nov 1, 2006, at 5:11 AM, Robin Vickery wrote:
On 01/11/06, Mel [EMAIL
Take out the comment before the DOCTYPE. There should be nothing before it.
201 - 300 of 883 matches
Mail list logo
