> > It should have a % for the width at least, and then it should wrap
> > itself.
>
> Not necessarily, if you have a single 'word' (a string of characters
with
> no
> space) that is very long then the width of the table stretches to
> accomodate
> the length of that 'word'.
Right, that's why I
On Monday 29 April 2002 01:53, John Holmes wrote:
> It should have a % for the width at least, and then it should wrap
> itself.
Not necessarily, if you have a single 'word' (a string of characters with no
space) that is very long then the width of the table stretches to accomodate
the length o
It should have a % for the width at least, and then it should wrap
itself.
---John Holmes...
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Reismanis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 7:42 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re:
Sorry I wasn't exactly clear on my explaination. I believe it is a
table design issue because i tried putting spaces between the image
tags. i.e. etc... and the table
was still been stretched. my solution has since been to force a
(using wordwrap) but I would rather force a space which i
4 matches
Mail list logo
