> -Original Message-
> From: Al [mailto:n...@ridersite.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 5:09 PM
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP programming strategy; lots of little
> include files, or a few big ones?
>
>
>
> On 1/6/2010 7:18 PM, clanc...@cybec.com.a
Daevid Vincent wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Al [mailto:n...@ridersite.org]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 5:09 PM
>> To: php-general@lists.php.net
>> Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP programming strategy; lots of little
>> include files, or a few big ones?
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/6/2
Daniel Kolbo wrote:
Daevid Vincent wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Al [mailto:n...@ridersite.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 5:09 PM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP programming strategy; lots of little
include files, or a few big ones?
On 1/6/2010
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 04:11, Daevid Vincent wrote:
> I think it's a case by case basis. Generally File I/O is expensive, but
> then again, as you say, having everything in a couple files is also
> sub-optimal for organizing and keeping things modular.
That is easily sorted out using automated bu
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 19:11:07 -0800, dae...@daevid.com ("Daevid Vincent") wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Al [mailto:n...@ridersite.org]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 5:09 PM
>> To: php-general@lists.php.net
>> Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP programming strategy; lots of little
>
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 23:20:26 -0500, kolb0...@umn.edu (Daniel Kolbo) wrote:
>Daevid Vincent wrote:
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Al [mailto:n...@ridersite.org]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 5:09 PM
>>> To: php-general@lists.php.net
>>> Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP programming
clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
Thank you all for your comments. I did not know about bytecode caches. They're
an
interesting concept, but if I am interpreting the paper
http://itst.net/654-php-on-fire-three-opcode-caches-compared correctly they
only double
the average speed of operation, which is
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 22:48:59 -0500, rob...@interjinn.com (Robert Cummings)
wrote:
>clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
>> Thank you all for your comments. I did not know about bytecode caches.
>> They're an
>> interesting concept, but if I am interpreting the paper
>> http://itst.net/654-php-on-fire-th
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:48 AM, Robert Cummings wrote:
>
> They almost always make your shit run faster.
I love your final statement Robert!
A reply of good grammar and vocabulary summarised most succinctly.
--
Graham
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
> ...
> They almost always make your shit run faster.
You know they make medicine for that? ;-)
Andrew
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Graham Cossey wrote:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:48 AM, Robert Cummings wrote:
They almost always make your shit run faster.
I love your final statement Robert!
A reply of good grammar and vocabulary summarised most succinctly.
:)
--
http://www.interjinn.com
Application and Templating Frame
clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 22:48:59 -0500, rob...@interjinn.com (Robert Cummings)
wrote:
clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
Thank you all for your comments. I did not know about bytecode caches. They're
an
interesting concept, but if I am interpreting the paper
http://itst.ne
Hi,
A note on bytecode caching and include/include_once performance. A
while ago when we were profiling our code, we did notice that file
includes do take a noticeable percentage of overall overhead (enough
for us to look into it more deep). We are using apc cache on a
standard LAMP platform (linu
Sorry forgot to mention that we used APC with apc.stat turned off
which will give a little bit more performance gain, but it does mean
flushing the cache on every code push (which is trivial).
Ravi
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:30 AM, J Ravi Menon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A note on bytecode caching and inc
On Jan 8, 2010, at 10:44 AM, Andrew Ballard wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Robert Cummings
wrote:
...
They almost always make your shit run faster.
You know they make medicine for that? ;-)
Andrew
--
Tacos?
Bastien
Sent from my iPod
--
PHP General Mailing List (http:
15 matches
Mail list logo