Re: Re[2]: [PHP] PHP vs. ColdFusion

2005-07-01 Thread Stéphane Bruno
Hello, I followed the discussions closely. I wanted to reply to some questions I saw in the discussions. I am using both PHP and Coldfusion, but both on Linux platforms. So, I am not bound to Microsoft technologies, and CF runs faster on Linux/Unix than on Windows. Like PHP, there is no need for

RE: Re[2]: [PHP] PHP vs. ColdFusion

2005-07-01 Thread Andrew Scott
with the reply to field different to your email address, your email client will add this line or did you not know that? -Original Message- From: Richard Davey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, 2 July 2005 12:49 AM To: php-general@lists.php.net Subject: Re[2]: [PHP] PHP vs. ColdF

Re[2]: [PHP] PHP vs. ColdFusion

2005-07-01 Thread Richard Davey
Hello Andrew, Friday, July 1, 2005, 3:06:49 PM, you wrote: AS> You know for a php developer your really don't know your own product to AS> well (blah blah blah) Isn't it time to run off and write another check to Adobe or something? Rather than personally attacking other list members. Best rega

Re[2]: [PHP] PHP vs. ColdFusion

2005-07-01 Thread Richard Davey
Hello Andrew, Friday, July 1, 2005, 3:32:14 PM, you wrote: AS> Well I am on about 20-30 as well, and when I press reply it goes to a AS> mailinglist address for broadcasting not the posters email address. Most likely because they've bastardised the mail headers to force in a reply-to address tha

Re: Re[2]: [PHP] PHP vs. ColdFusion

2005-06-30 Thread Brad Pauly
On 6/30/05, Matthew Weier O'Phinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That doesn't address scalability, however. So, let's look at that. I'm > not sure how CF scales, not having been in a CF shop. However, I know > what I can do to scale PHP: > > * Use code optimizers/bytecode caches (zend, apc, eAc

Re: Re[2]: [PHP] PHP vs. ColdFusion

2005-06-30 Thread Matthew Weier O'Phinney
* "Andrew Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > CF is very rapid development, and you might say the same about PHP. > The point is that these are all the things you need to take into > consideration, the cost that it would take to develop and maintain in > either language, as well as cost involved in the n

RE: Re[2]: [PHP] PHP vs. ColdFusion

2005-06-30 Thread Jay Blanchard
[snip] Would you develop in a language that you know could not deliver an enterprise solution if in 6 months that's what you really need, and how would you look if you recommended a language because it was free, but in time had to spend more again to make it fully scalable to an enterprise level if

Re: Re[2]: [PHP] PHP vs. ColdFusion

2005-06-30 Thread david forums
Hi Concerning php and J2EE, zend platform is providing a solid bridge between both environment. This as been specially build for developping big system (banking, tracking, etc). regards david Le Thu, 30 Jun 2005 13:06:22 +0200, Richard Davey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit: Hello Andr

RE: Re[2]: [PHP] PHP vs. ColdFusion

2005-06-30 Thread Andrew Scott
Richard, And your point of before you pay your programmer is what one of my other points was. CF is very rapid development, and you might say the same about PHP. The point is that these are all the things you need to take into consideration, the cost that it would take to develop and maintain i

Re[2]: [PHP] PHP vs. ColdFusion

2005-06-30 Thread Richard Davey
Hello Andrew, Thursday, June 30, 2005, 9:15:22 AM, you wrote: AS> Coldfusion is also free (Blue Dragon) and has just as much support AS> as PHP, although. PHP can not run in a J2EE environment, limiting AS> it to small scall websites and limiting the prospect of expansion AS> or server migration.

Re[2]: [PHP] PHP vs. ColdFusion

2005-06-29 Thread Richard Davey
Hello Andrew, Wednesday, June 29, 2005, 5:24:50 PM, you wrote: AS> AS> AS> AS> AS> AS> AS> The above is tags that I am referring to very similar to java tag libraries, AS> these tags read data from a database, validate and display the data like AS> windows .net forms in a webpage. Ye