php-general Digest 21 Jul 2007 19:20:11 -0000 Issue 4916
Topics (messages 259291 through 259310):
Re: Pirate PHP books online?
259291 by: Crayon Shin Chan
259293 by: Jim Lucas
259294 by: Dotan Cohen
259295 by: Crayon Shin Chan
259296 by: Crayon Shin Chan
259301 by: David Powers
259305 by: Larry Garfield
259306 by: Larry Garfield
Re: How to skipping the range of values from each element of array??
259292 by: Jim Lucas
PHP parent-child form
259297 by: Man-wai Chang
Re: Denial of Service Attack
259298 by: Crayon Shin Chan
259302 by: Dotan Cohen
Re: Symfony versus CakePHP?
259299 by: AmirBehzad Eslami
259303 by: Greg Donald
259304 by: Greg Donald
259307 by: Larry Garfield
Re: Cannot send session cache limiter...
259300 by: Wesley Acheson
Re: PHP Performance and System Load
259308 by: Nathan Nobbe
Re: About Login Authentication
259309 by: Nathan Nobbe
Re: Save email as .eml file
259310 by: Manuel Lemos
Administrivia:
To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To post to the list, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--- Begin Message ---
On Saturday 21 July 2007 04:15, Tijnema wrote:
> Old paper can be recycled, lost energy from computers can't ;)
Recycling old paper use energy as well.
--
Crayon
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Crayon Shin Chan wrote:
On Saturday 21 July 2007 04:15, Tijnema wrote:
Old paper can be recycled, lost energy from computers can't ;)
Recycling old paper use energy as well.
more then likely, recycling a stack of newspapers would cost more then
running my computer for a month.
--
Jim Lucas
"Some men are born to greatness, some achieve greatness,
and some have greatness thrust upon them."
Twelfth Night, Act II, Scene V
by William Shakespeare
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 21/07/07, Crayon Shin Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Saturday 21 July 2007 04:15, Tijnema wrote:
> Old paper can be recycled, lost energy from computers can't ;)
Recycling old paper use energy as well.
Oh, the entropy! I believe that the topic was well covered in Asimov's
"The Last Question".
Let there be light!
Dotan Cohen
http://lyricslist.com/
http://what-is-what.com/
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Saturday 21 July 2007 16:20, Jim Lucas wrote:
> more then likely, recycling a stack of newspapers would cost more then
> running my computer for a month.
Also reminds me of how some people (especially Americans) who drive miles
and miles in their big gas-guzzling SUVs so they could drop off their
recyclables at a recycling centre.
--
Crayon
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Saturday 21 July 2007 08:58, Richard Lynch wrote:
> In the olden days, it often turned into "slash the cover and donate it
> and collect tax break", I do believe, but I think that practice was
> decried and has decreased.
Just curious, which part was decried: "slash the cover" or "donate it and
collect tax break" or "collect tax break"?
--
Crayon
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Richard Lynch wrote:
I've got a pretty good idea what your advance was, and what your
royalties are.
I suspect that your estimate of the advances paid by Apress/friends of
Ed is inflated. Royalties are no secret: Apress publishes its standard
contract on the web for prospective authors to see. The basic rate is
10% of the net income received by the publisher. Since heavy discounting
is prevalent in the publishing industry, this means the author ends up
with less than 5% of the book's cover price. So on a book with a cover
price of $40, the author gets less than $2. You need to sell a very
large number of books to make a reasonable return on the time invested.
I'm sticking to my statement that, surprisingly, you've probably made
more than some rock "stars" with bad contract who had only one hit
song.
I have no doubt that a lot of musicians end up with a very poor deal. So
do many authors. The point is that the pirate site in question seems to
take particular pleasure in defying the big movie and recording
companies. Those companies are profitable enough to sustain the loss of
royalties, and big-name artists do get a large enough advance to enjoy a
high-octane lifestyle. However, piracy hits the individual author or
musician disproportionately.
I'm under no illusion that the 2,000+ downloads of my book would have
turned into legitimate sales if illegal copies weren't available. But
writing about PHP is a highly competitive niche market. Any loss of
sales is unwelcome.
David Powers
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Friday 20 July 2007, Richard Lynch wrote:
> >> Perhaps your day job should stop paying you, because after you've
> >> spent that time, you'll never get it back?
> >
> > Is this "make up things that Larry said" day? It must be, because I
> > know
> > you're not that stupid, Richard. If my boss doesn't pay me, it's
> > breach of
> > contract. There's nothing in dispute there.
>
> My point was only that when the book was written is irrelevant.
>
> It's just as irrelevant as the lag time between your work and your
> paycheck.
No, it is quite relevant. The time spent on the book/program/creative work
cannot be gotten back whether you are paid for it or not, therefore that time
cannot be "stolen" from you. There may, however, be a breach of contract
involved in either case. It is an important distinction. See below.
> > It's not a semantic game. Copyright infringement is not theft, under
> > the laws
> > of the USA or the laws of physics. To call it such is "wrong",
> > inaccurate,
> > misleading, disingenuous, ignorant, and otherwise inappropriate.
> >> and a violation of the author's reasonable expectations,
> >
> > Artificially created by the law, yes.
>
> And is not the ability to enforce a "contract" between two people not
> artificially created by the law as well?
>
> One could just as easily argue that all civil law suits, artificial
> creations by law and not having actual criminal behaviour, should also
> be thrown out.
I never said that "artificial laws" should all be thrown out. They should,
however, be understood in their proper context.
A physical object can only be in the possession of one person at a time, per
the laws of physics. Property law enhances and structures that natural
situation.
Information, which includes both ideas and their creative expression, by
nature becomes known to anyone it touches without depriving the originator of
it. It can be possessed by more than one person simultaneously. Copyright
law artificially creates such a restriction on movement in an attempt to make
its creation more economically attractive. It is not, however, directly
based on physical laws.
Note that I am not making a statement about right or wrong about either of the
above sorts of laws. I am simply explaining them in proper context, because
one cannot make a viable statement about whether they are right or wrong
without understanding them in proper context.
Speeding while driving is also an "artificial law" in that regard, as there is
no physical law that says a car can only go 30 mph. That doesn't make
speeding OK or less illegal, it just means that it is not a natural law.
> > Really people. I find it hard to believe that the
> > otherwise-intelligent
> > people on this list have such a hard time with the concept that
> > something
> > should not be done for reasons that don't involve physical property,
> > just as
> > I find it hard to believe that making up things that someone
> > supposedly said
> > has suddenly become the "in" thing to do.
>
> Your post made it seem that you were in favor of those who choose to
> infringe on copyright.
In every online copyright debate I've gotten into, people always seem to
assume that "either you're with us or you're with the evil terr'ist pirates".
Nothing could be further from the truth, nor further from actual sense.
That's why I keep getting into these debates; to point out that it's not a
simple "copyright is moral and eternal vs. rampant theft and economic
downfall" question.
--
Larry Garfield AIM: LOLG42
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 6817012
"If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of
exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea,
which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to
himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession
of every one, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it." -- Thomas
Jefferson
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Friday 20 July 2007, Richard Lynch wrote:
> On Wed, July 18, 2007 6:35 am, Jay Blanchard wrote:
> > [snip]
> > Artificially created by the law, yes.
> > [/snip]
> >
> > Just curious, if this artificiality did not exist what could an
> > author's
> > reasonable expectation be?
>
> Starvation.
I eat quite well giving away code, thank you. It's under the GPL, but most of
our clients would really not hurt us if they spread it around without the
GPL. It's just some business models that would lead to starvation.
Musicians would still have performances, as they have for hundreds of years
and as they do now. :-)
--
Larry Garfield AIM: LOLG42
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 6817012
"If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of
exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea,
which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to
himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession
of every one, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it." -- Thomas
Jefferson
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
sivasakthi wrote:
Hi All,
I have an array like that below,
array(
'test %ts.%03tu %6tr %>a %Ss/%03Hs %>st %rm %ru %un %Sh/%>A
%mt %rv %>st',
'squid %ts.%03tu %6tr %>a %Ss/%03Hs %>st %rm %ru %un %Sh/%>A
%mt %ea %>st %st %lp'
'tmp %ts.%03tu %6tr %>a %Ss/%03Hs %>st %rm %ru %un %Sh/%>A %
mt %lp %us %ue %ea'
);
In that i need to skip the values from 1 to 10 of each line...
could u help me to find the solutions??
Thanks in advance
would you be so kind as to point out the values from 1 to 10.
what do you want your output to look like?
and when you say skip, do you want to leave them out of the results, or
skip the entire row of data?
--
Jim Lucas
"Some men are born to greatness, some achieve greatness,
and some have greatness thrust upon them."
Twelfth Night, Act II, Scene V
by William Shakespeare
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Is there a good book that shows good techniques in coding parent-child
forms, for example, an invoice object which has a header(invoice no,
date, customer code, invoice total) and multiple items (item no, item
name, quantity, price, amount)?
--
@~@ Might, Courage, Vision, SINCERITY.
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and Farce be with you!
/( _ )\ (Xubuntu 7.04) Linux 2.6.22.1
^ ^ 16:47:01 up 9 days 18:51 0 users load average: 1.01 1.03 1.00
news://news.3home.net news://news.hkpcug.org news://news.newsgroup.com.hk
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Saturday 21 July 2007 10:24, Jim Lucas wrote:
> So, I guess to sum up what the guy is talking about, I think he is
> right. Some of us might have been DDOSed from making posts on this
> list.
>
> my email address points right back to my web server.....
>
> What does everybody else think?
There are some mailing list archive websites that goes to the website
derived from your email address domain and links the favicon (if any) for
display next to your posts. Whether that is enough to lead to a DOS is
debatable.
--
Crayon
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 21/07/07, Crayon Shin Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Saturday 21 July 2007 10:24, Jim Lucas wrote:
> So, I guess to sum up what the guy is talking about, I think he is
> right. Some of us might have been DDOSed from making posts on this
> list.
>
> my email address points right back to my web server.....
>
> What does everybody else think?
There are some mailing list archive websites that goes to the website
derived from your email address domain and links the favicon (if any) for
display next to your posts. Whether that is enough to lead to a DOS is
debatable.
It might also query SPF records. That could lead to server load as
well, as could anything else that 'leads to your server'. But I doubt
that a favicon, even if requested by 1000 clients going over the
archives in an hour, would cause heavy enough traffic to DDoS a
serious webserver.
Dotan Cohen
http://lyricslist.com/
http://what-is-what.com/
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
What is difference between Zend Framwork and other frameworks like
CakePHP? I'm trying to develop a sample blog for educational
purposes in Zend Framwork, but some times I feel that I'm learning
a new language or a new programming paradigm.
On 7/21/07, Larry Garfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Back in January I was looking for a framework for a project that ended up
being canceled anyway. :-) I considered both CakePHP and Symfony, and had
decided on CakePHP for a very simple reason: It was smaller. It was pure
PHP
while Symfony relied on Propel which in turn used YAML syntax to define
its
object model, which it then compiled to XML, which in turn was used to
generate both the SQL tables and the base classes in PHP.
I saw no reason to learn Yet Another Markup Language (I can't take
seriously
any markup system that acknowledges that it serves no useful purpose) and
install/load/use a multi-meg system when Cake was far smaller, built its
classes off of the SQL directly, and didn't require me to learn still more
obscure syntax.
Of course, I hate Rails-style code-generation frameworks anyway, so I'm
kinda
glad I never actually built that project. :-) YMMV.
On Friday 20 July 2007, Steve Finkelstein wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm terribly sorry if this is a redundant inquiry. I'm a rather
> inexperienced developer who's catching on quickly, and looking for a
> framework to build out a project I've been assigned. I'm more of a read
> a book and try things out type of learner.
>
> My question to those with more experience, what exactly is the
> difference between CakePHP and Symfony? I'm looking into both of them
> for a potential framework to make robust and scalable code. They both
> seem to try to obtain the same goals with their project, however Symfony
> has text written about it, etc.
>
> Anyway, thank you for any insight.
>
> - sf
--
Larry Garfield AIM: LOLG42
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 6817012
"If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of
exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea,
which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to
himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the
possession
of every one, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it." --
Thomas
Jefferson
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 7/20/07, Larry Garfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I saw no reason to learn Yet Another Markup Language (I can't take seriously
any markup system that acknowledges that it serves no useful purpose) and
YAML takes 5 minutes to learn. It's very useful for quickly adding
test fixtures to Rails apps, sample data, and the like. It's a
gazillion times lighter weight than XML and just as easy to use as
JSON. Much like anything opensource, don't let the name scare you,
YAML is good stuff.
--
Greg Donald
http://destiney.com/
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 7/21/07, AmirBehzad Eslami <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What is difference between Zend Framwork and other frameworks like
CakePHP?
In a nutshell Zend Framework if bigger, heavier, and does more
"stuff." I find many parts of it look exactly like parts from the
Mojavi MVC framework. Could be a coincidence I guess..
I'm trying to develop a sample blog for educational
purposes in Zend Framwork, but some times I feel that I'm learning
a new language or a new programming paradigm.
It's a learning curve for sure, but once you have one MVC framework in
your tool belt, you can pick up others easily. I started off using it
for simple things like email address validation and sending HTML
emails. You certainly don't have to use the whole thing to get some
very good uses from it.
--
Greg Donald
http://destiney.com/
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Disclaimer: I have not used Zend Framework. What I am about to say is based
on a blog entry by someone whose name I forget so I can't go track it down
now. :-)
CakePHP, Symfony, Drupal, etc. are "full stack" systems. That is, they
provide an integrated structure and you match your development to that
structure. That means doing things the system's way makes life quite
straightforward, but going against the grain makes life quite difficult.
Zend Framework, ezComponents, etc. are "component" systems. They're more of a
collection of robust tools that you can put together your own way to build
something without having a structure presented to you already. That means
you're not bound by a given structure, but you also don't have a structure to
fall back on.
Both are appropriate in different situations.
On Saturday 21 July 2007, AmirBehzad Eslami wrote:
> What is difference between Zend Framwork and other frameworks like
> CakePHP? I'm trying to develop a sample blog for educational
> purposes in Zend Framwork, but some times I feel that I'm learning
> a new language or a new programming paradigm.
>
> On 7/21/07, Larry Garfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Back in January I was looking for a framework for a project that ended up
> > being canceled anyway. :-) I considered both CakePHP and Symfony, and
> > had decided on CakePHP for a very simple reason: It was smaller. It was
> > pure PHP
> > while Symfony relied on Propel which in turn used YAML syntax to define
> > its
> > object model, which it then compiled to XML, which in turn was used to
> > generate both the SQL tables and the base classes in PHP.
> >
> > I saw no reason to learn Yet Another Markup Language (I can't take
> > seriously
> > any markup system that acknowledges that it serves no useful purpose) and
> > install/load/use a multi-meg system when Cake was far smaller, built its
> > classes off of the SQL directly, and didn't require me to learn still
> > more obscure syntax.
> >
> > Of course, I hate Rails-style code-generation frameworks anyway, so I'm
> > kinda
> > glad I never actually built that project. :-) YMMV.
> >
> > On Friday 20 July 2007, Steve Finkelstein wrote:
> > > All,
> > >
> > > I'm terribly sorry if this is a redundant inquiry. I'm a rather
> > > inexperienced developer who's catching on quickly, and looking for a
> > > framework to build out a project I've been assigned. I'm more of a read
> > > a book and try things out type of learner.
> > >
> > > My question to those with more experience, what exactly is the
> > > difference between CakePHP and Symfony? I'm looking into both of them
> > > for a potential framework to make robust and scalable code. They both
> > > seem to try to obtain the same goals with their project, however
> > > Symfony has text written about it, etc.
> > >
> > > Anyway, thank you for any insight.
> > >
> > > - sf
> >
> > --
> > Larry Garfield AIM: LOLG42
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 6817012
> >
> > "If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of
> > exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an
> > idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it
> > to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the
> > possession
> > of every one, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it." --
> > Thomas
> > Jefferson
> >
> > --
> > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
Larry Garfield AIM: LOLG42
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 6817012
"If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of
exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea,
which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to
himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession
of every one, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it." -- Thomas
Jefferson
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
From: "Richard Lynch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Vanessa Vega" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 16:39:51 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: Re: [PHP] session_start(): Cannot send session cache limiter...
On Fri, July 20, 2007 3:17 am, Paul Scott wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 16:01 +0800, Vanessa Vega wrote:
>> I already put session_start() on topmost part of the file..but i
>> saved the
>> file as utf-8..and that seems to be the problem..can anyone share
>> their
>> knowledge on this?
>>
> Set your error_reporting to at least E_ALL and check that there are no
> problems there first. That should give you more of a clue as to what
> is
> happening.
Did you save it as UTF-8 with that byte-order-mark (BOM) thingie?
Does UTF-8 even HAVE a BOM?
I believe a BOM has messed others up in the past.
Perhaps Google for your problem before posting will find an answer
quicker... :-)
--
Some people have a "gift" link here.
Know what I want?
I want you to buy a CD from some indie artist.
http://cdbaby.com/browse/from/lynch
Yeah, I get a buck. So?
I believe on "Windows" with word for example it inserts a byte order
mark incorrectly. \ufeff. is what it comes out if I run the
native2ascii program.This isn't technically correct behaviour and it
shouldn't occur.
Regards,
Wesley Acheson
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
on the point of class size; i think this is more a design issue than a
performance issue.
i worked at a place where we had several files w/ classes that were several
thousand lines in size.
one i remember was over 6000 lines long. personally i would never let
something grow that large,
but all im saying is we had large classes like that and the system wasnt
crawling.
-nathan
On 7/20/07, Larry Garfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 20 July 2007, Sascha Braun, CEO @ ejackup.com wrote:
> Dear People,
> The webserver does only contain the webspace filesystem structure as
> well as 5 line of PHP Code dummies, for every document in the content
> management system, to avoid the usage of mod_rewrite.
I inherited a CMS at work that did that.
Stop. Now. Use mod_rewrite. You'll live longer and spend less on
hair-regrowth medication.
mod_rewrite is not itself a huge performance hit. If you're on a
dedicated
server then you can move the mod_rewrite directive to the apache.conf file
and disable .htaccess files, which can give you a performance boost, but
if a
reasonably simple mod_rewrite is the difference that is killing your
server
then you need to rethink your server. It's a minor issue. You'll get a
better performance gain out of a slightly faster processor.
Your PHP coding style itself likely has little if any impact on
performance.
pre vs. post increment is going to be a tiny fraction of a percent
compared
to the time taken to parse code, hit the database, hit the disk, etc.
As others have said, benchmark benchmark benchmark. As a general
guideline,
the big performance killers I've run in to include:
- Parsing. Opcode cache is good, but if you can give it less to cache
that
helps, too. You said you're already using autoload(), which helps, but
make
sure that you're not loading gobs of code that you don't use. Even with
an
opcode cache, that will eat up RAM.
- SQL in loops. Never do this.
- Cache pretty much everything that you get back from the database if you
can,
using a static variable. (Not a global; a static variable local to a
function or method, or a private class variable.) If you're loading
complex
objects, cache the fully prepared version. That not only provides a
performance boost, but also provides you with a good
single-point-of-optimization because it's then much easier to shift that
from
a static variable or static array to a memcached storage.
- Limit your individual transfers. Oft-forgotten, but remember that every
file the browser has to request is another HTTP hit on the server. Even
if
the response from the server is "nope, no change", it's still an HTTP hit.
That can really hurt your effective performance, both on the server side
and
client side. Merge your CSS and JS into as few files as reasonable, even
if
that means that you send more than you need to on the first page
request. It
helps overall. You can do that manually or automatically. (Drupal, for
instance, auto-aggregates CSS and in the next version will auto-aggregate
JS,
too. That's been a big performance boost.) The same goes for image
files.
- Apropos of the last, Firebug! The latest version has a great profiler
that
can show you how long each HTTP request takes. You may find that you
spend
most of your browser-load time on things that don't involve PHP at all.
- EXPLAIN your SQL. That is, the MySQL EXPLAIN command prefixed to any
SELECT
query will tell you how MySQL is going to parse and process it. Odds are
good that adding a few well-placed keys/indexes will make your SQL an
order
of magnitude faster or more. Also, watch out for filesort. Any time a
query
has to do a filesort, it gets slow. It always has to filesort if you are
doing a WHERE and ORDER BY that use fields in different tables. Avoid
that
if you can. Much more information in a MySQL group. :-)
Again, benchmark it from every direction you can. Odds are, though, that
your
PHP code itself is not the bottleneck but the server configuration, SQL
server, HTTP traffic, etc. are where you're really dying.
Cheers.
--
Larry Garfield AIM: LOLG42
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 6817012
"If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of
exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea,
which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to
himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the
possession
of every one, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it." --
Thomas
Jefferson
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
heres an article
<http://phpsec.org/articles/2005/password-hashing.html>from the php
security consortium.
-nathan
On 7/21/07, Stephen Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What type of authentication are you looking to do ???
How secure, and how detailed do you want to be with it?
On 7/20/07 9:49 PM, "Kelvin Park" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's a good place in the Internet where I could learn about creating
login
> and member authentication enabled web site?
> I would appreciate any good references.
--
Stephen Johnson
The Lone Coder
http://www.thumbnailresume.com
*Network with your Resume, not just your card.*
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.thelonecoder.com
*Continuing the struggle against bad code*
--
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,
on 07/18/2007 10:56 AM Rosen said the following:
> Hi,
> Is there a way to create e-mail with PHP and save it to .eml file
> (without sending)?
You can use the GetMessage function of this class. It can compose
messages like you want, and then it can return the composed message in
.eml format as a text string.
http://www.phpclasses.org/mimemessage
--
Regards,
Manuel Lemos
Metastorage - Data object relational mapping layer generator
http://www.metastorage.net/
PHP Classes - Free ready to use OOP components written in PHP
http://www.phpclasses.org/
--- End Message ---
