On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Jesse Santana wrote:
To: Paul Blondé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Jesse Santana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [PHP-INSTALL] PHP v4 vs. PHP v5 behavior (fwd)
That wasn't a typo. This code is pulled directly from the phpBB
installation (install.php
1250 Bellflower Blvd.
Long Beach, CA 90840
Office: (562)985-8511
Fax: (562)985-8855
Paul Blondé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
08/10/2007 02:09 PM
To
"'Jesse Santana'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
Subject
RE: [PHP-INSTALL] PHP v4 vs. PHP v5 behavior
ok, this seems to indi
lifornia State University, Long Beach
1250 Bellflower Blvd.
Long Beach, CA 90840
Office: (562)985-8511
Fax: (562)985-8855
Paul Blondé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
08/10/2007 02:03 PM
To
"'Keith Roberts'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
cc
Subject
RE: [PHP-INSTALL] PHP
85-8855
Keith Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
08/10/2007 01:14 PM
Please respond to
Keith Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
Jesse Santana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
Subject
Re: [PHP-INSTALL] PHP v4 vs. PHP v5 behavior
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Jesse Santana wrote:
> The new server
Santana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 1:55 PM
To: Matthew Marino
Cc: Paul Blondé; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PHP-INSTALL] PHP v4 vs. PHP v5 behavior
Matthew,
Hard coding the entire path causes the script to work under both PHP v4 and
PHP v5. I would
-Original Message-
>
>I use ../../ all over the place on PHP 5.2.1 - the only complaints I get
>from PHP is if I have not set the include path correctly.
>
>HTH
>
>Keith
>
The only thing I noticed, though, was that he posted a path with "./../",
not "../../", which could have been a typo
1250 Bellflower Blvd.
Long Beach, CA 90840
Office: (562)985-8511
Fax: (562)985-8855
Matthew Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
08/10/2007 01:00 PM
To
Jesse Santana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
Paul Blondé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [email protected]
Subject
Re: [PHP-INSTALL] PHP v4 v
27;Jesse Santana'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
Subject
RE: [PHP-INSTALL] PHP v4 vs. PHP v5 behavior
Is it possible that the file owner and/or permissions are not correctly
set?
Paul Blondé
Web Programmer
enTel Communications Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTE
Sorry for posting to you directly Jesse. Here it is for the
list now.
-- Forwarded message --
To: Jesse Santana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Keith Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [PHP-INSTALL] PHP v4 vs. PHP v5 behavior
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Jesse Santana wr
8511
Fax: (562)985-8855
Paul Blondé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
08/10/2007 11:18 AM
To
"'Jesse Santana'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
Subject
RE: [PHP-INSTALL] PHP v4 vs. PHP v5 behavior
I believe the notation "./../" is illegal, perhaps either the new
PHP o
gt;
08/10/2007 11:18 AM
To
"'Jesse Santana'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
Subject
RE: [PHP-INSTALL] PHP v4 vs. PHP v5 behavior
I believe the notation "./../" is illegal, perhaps either the new PHP or
the new Solaris is probably now enforcing that when the old did
gt; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
250.633.5151
866.633.2644
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Santana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 10:54 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [PHP-INSTALL] PHP v4 vs. PHP v5 behavior
Maybe someone can shed some light on this problem for me.
Maybe someone can shed some light on this problem for me. Our current
production server is a Solaris 9 machine running Apache 1.3.37 and PHP
4.4.2. The following script works perfectly on this machine:
";
echo "Hello World!";
?>
The new server we are setting up is running Solaris 10, Apache 2
13 matches
Mail list logo
