On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 2:42 AM, Hannes Magnusson
> wrote:
>>
>> In anycase, we provide over 20.000 links to all our mirrors. I think
>> that is more then bargained for.
>
>
> true, but if we pull the switch keeping the current layout wi
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 2:42 AM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> I don't understand how mirror crediting is related to the 6month old
> thread on thanks.php?
>
I was looking through my mailbox and noticed that this thread had a mail
that I didn't checked back then, and when re-reading the thread the
fo
I don't understand how mirror crediting is related to the 6month old
thread on thanks.php?
In anycase, we provide over 20.000 links to all our mirrors. I think
that is more then bargained for.
-Hannes
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 4:26 PM,
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> >
> > So it seems that with the current beta site both the mirror hoster logo
> in
> > the right column and the 'generously provided by' textual link to the
> hoster
> > are gone.
> > Are
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>
> So it seems that with the current beta site both the mirror hoster logo in
> the right column and the 'generously provided by' textual link to the hoster
> are gone.
> Are we satisfied with that? I'm a little bit curious what will be the
> r
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 3:33 AM, Philip Olson wrote:
>
> On Jul 5, 2012, at 6:16 PM, Daniel Brown wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Philip Olson
> wrote:
> >>
> >> And thanks.php could be updated and refer to the credits, as we really
> aren't
> >> only thanking people who provide hard
