Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
> we already have phpdoc/scripts/make_man.php,
Ok, this doesn't work anymore (well, somehow) as it heavily relies
on the DocBook 3 and its internal structure, while
we now use DocBook 4 which does look a little
different ...
I tried to fix the regex magic in the scrip
Philip Olson wrote:
> one concern is the php manual is heavily linked, some
> documentation almost depends on readers clicking around
> through them. something to think about at least :)
unix-style man pages obviously make sense for the function reference
pages only, and there linking is don
ID: 14883
Updated by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Status: Bogus
+Status: Open
Bug Type: Documentation problem
Operating System: Windows NT (all Win32)
PHP Version: 4.1.1
New Comment:
I just would like to make s
alindeman Thu Feb 28 20:07:34 2002 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/chapters security.xml
Log:
/etc/password -> /etc/passwd
Index: phpdoc/en/chapters/security.xml
diff -u phpdoc/en/chapters/security.xml:1.45 phpdoc/en/chapters/security.xml:1.46
--- phpdo
ID: 14883
Updated by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Status: Open
+Status: Bogus
Bug Type: Documentation problem
Operating System: Windows NT (all Win32)
PHP Version: 4.1.1
New Comment:
Not a doc prob...RTFM
ht
ID: 14883
Updated by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status: Open
Bug Type: Documentation problem
Operating System: Windows NT (all Win32)
PHP Version: 4.1.1
New Comment:
The problem can be avoided by setting doc_root in ph
ID: 14883
Updated by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status: Open
-Bug Type: Apache related
+Bug Type: Documentation problem
Operating System: Windows NT (all Win32)
PHP Version: 4.1.1
New Comment:
I think document i
one concern is the php manual is heavily linked, some
documentation almost depends on readers clicking around
through them. something to think about at least :)
regards,
Philip Olson
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Mark Kronsbein wrote:
>
>
> Egon Schmid wrote:
> >
> > We doesn´t need alternative i
> Fist: Who is "we"?
Arghs, this should have been "first"...
Mark
--
German Gabber Network @ http://www.gabber.de
Infos und Tips zu PHP http://www.php-homepage.de
Egon Schmid wrote:
>
> We doesn´t need alternative interfaces.
Fist: Who is "we"?
Second: Why not? I someone likes to print manual on toilet paper to read
on the toilet, well, let him do this.
Egon, this [ insert-format-you-like-here ] will not "kill" the
"original" PHP manual, it will help
On Thu, 2002-02-28 at 10:18, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
> > > > Just to make this posting a little more "useful", here is a
> suggestion. It
> > > > is hard to ignore that the documentation has many typos and gross
> writing
> > > > mistakes. Especially the users' notes. It is not only ugly, it also
> >
Also allowing such man entries will go well with the
upcoming PHP versions, which come standard with CLI
now.
Philip
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Jirka Kosek wrote:
> Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
> >
> > Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> > > okay, let's code it!
> >
> > we already have phpdoc/scripts/make_man.p
tal Thu Feb 28 14:47:19 2002 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/he/appendices commandline.xml
Log:
hmm... fixed the Status in the tag
Index: phpdoc/he/appendices/commandline.xml
diff -u phpdoc/he/appendices/commandline.xml:1.2
phpdoc/he/appendices/commandli
tal Thu Feb 28 14:46:18 2002 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/he/appendices commandline.xml
Log:
finished
Index: phpdoc/he/appendices/commandline.xml
diff -u phpdoc/he/appendices/commandline.xml:1.1
phpdoc/he/appendices/commandline.xml:1.2
--- phpdoc/he/a
Please revert this patch. We use German text in examples. BTW you
have introduced commas in enumeration before the closing "und". This
is an error in German and Hungarian but not in English.
-Egon
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Schoefbeck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
tom Thu Feb 28 13:21:42 2002 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/de/functionsarray.xml
Log:
file is actual again
Index: phpdoc/de/functions/array.xml
diff -u phpdoc/de/functions/array.xml:1.32 phpdoc/de/functions/array.xml:1.33
--- phpdoc/de/functions/arra
tom Thu Feb 28 13:20:36 2002 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/functionsarray.xml
Log:
corr. copy-paste-err, ren .php3 to php
Index: phpdoc/en/functions/array.xml
diff -u phpdoc/en/functions/array.xml:1.160 phpdoc/en/functions/array.xml:1.161
--- phpdo
jimwThu Feb 28 13:14:33 2002 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/faq build.xml
Log:
this is wrong, wrong, wrong. /usr/include/linux should not be a
symlink to kernel sources.
Index: phpdoc/en/faq/build.xml
diff -u phpdoc/en/faq/build.xml:1.13 phpdoc/en
> > > Just to make this posting a little more "useful", here is a
suggestion. It
> > > is hard to ignore that the documentation has many typos and gross
writing
> > > mistakes. Especially the users' notes. It is not only ugly, it also
> > > prevents words from being detected by the search engine.
On Thu, 2002-02-28 at 07:38, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We received this suggestion about proofreading the manual content:
>
> > Just to make this posting a little more "useful", here is a suggestion. It
> > is hard to ignore that the documentation has many typos and gross writing
> > mistake
Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
>
> Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> > okay, let's code it!
>
> we already have phpdoc/scripts/make_man.php,
> but i'd like to see a more general solution like docbook2man ...
There is such solution, but I didn't used it personally:
http://docbook2x.sourceforge.net/docbook2man
sander Thu Feb 28 11:21:17 2002 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/functionsvar.xml misc.xml
Log:
Added and/or improved documentation for second argument of highlight_string(),
highlight_file(), show_source() and var_export().
Index: phpdoc/en/function
Hi!
We received this suggestion about proofreading the manual content:
> Just to make this posting a little more "useful", here is a suggestion. It
> is hard to ignore that the documentation has many typos and gross writing
> mistakes. Especially the users' notes. It is not only ugly, it also
>
> http://www.php.net/manual/en/faq.php looks rather strange to me. why do
> the numbers start at 43? 42+1 or what? ;)
It is a bug for a long time now, and should be a parameter in DSSSL
sheets. It's because the same reason, why features, language, and
zend parts begin from those numbers...
There
jan Thu Feb 28 09:42:53 2002 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/faq build.xml
Log:
- fix typo
Index: phpdoc/en/faq/build.xml
diff -u phpdoc/en/faq/build.xml:1.12 phpdoc/en/faq/build.xml:1.13
--- phpdoc/en/faq/build.xml:1.12Thu Feb 28 09:31:20 2
jan Thu Feb 28 09:31:20 2002 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/faq build.xml
Log:
- added entry about ./configure lines and how to find the
- previous ones when upgrading PHP. (thanks to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- for suggesting this).
Index: phpdoc/en
gobaThu Feb 28 09:21:03 2002 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/xsl html-common.xsl
Log:
The solution for manual-wise missing links in XSL generated HTML files.
This is the right and order...
Index: phpdoc/xsl/html-common.xsl
diff -u phpdoc/xsl/html-common.
Hi,
http://www.php.net/manual/en/faq.php looks rather strange to me. why do
the numbers start at 43? 42+1 or what? ;)
Jan
--
Q: Thank Jan? A: http://geschenke.an.dasmoped.net/
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> okay, let's code it!
we already have phpdoc/scripts/make_man.php,
but i'd like to see a more general solution like docbook2man ...
http://cvs.php.net/co.php/phpdoc/scripts/make_man.php?r=1.1
> well, i'm completely new to the phpdoc stuff, so some introduction
> would be
Egon Schmid wrote:
> If Enrico would build his own man pages he can do so, but I don´t
> see that we should distribute man pages from phpweb.
i'd *love* to have good unix-style man pages
typing "man something" is the natural way of getting documentation
for functions and commands on unix ...
"m
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Egon Schmid wrote:
> We doesn´t need alternative interfaces.
Who is "we"? That you don't need a man-version of the manual does'nt mean,
that nobody needs a man-page. I think a man-page would be great.
Regards,
Sebastian Nohn
--
Did I help you? Consider a gift!
http://www.a
ID: 15777
Updated by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Status: Open
+Status: Bogus
Bug Type: Documentation problem
Operating System: Solaris
PHP Version: 4.1.2
New Comment:
The bug system is not the appropriate foru
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Operating system: Solaris
PHP version: 4.1.2
PHP Bug Type: Documentation problem
Bug description: REMOTE_USER
anyone know when
REMOTE_USER is not empty?
Tried to capture it in a Solaris/Apache server, only got REMOTE_ADDR
pointed to the remote I
> > > We doesn´t need alternative interfaces.
> >
> > could you elaborate on that?
>
> If Enrico would build his own man pages he can do so, but I don´t
> see that we should distribute man pages from phpweb.
Why? Does it hurt?
Goba
> +
> +
> + The return parameter became available in PHP
> + 4.2.0. Before this time it behaved like the default, which is
&false;
> +
> +
Please also add back tip.obcapture here, or some identical see also
for users of PHP before 4.2.0 ;)
Goba
From: "Hartmut Holzgraefe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Egon Schmid wrote:
> > We doesn´t need alternative interfaces.
>
> could you elaborate on that?
If Enrico would build his own man pages he can do so, but I don´t
see that we should distribute man pages from phpweb.
-Egon
Egon Schmid wrote:
> We doesn´t need alternative interfaces.
could you elaborate on that?
--
Hartmut Holzgraefe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.six.de +49-711-99091-77
Wir stellen für Sie aus auf der CeBIT 2002 und freuen uns
in Halle 6 auf Ihren Besuch am Stand H 18
Hi,
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002 09:31:53 +0100
Enrico Weigelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> btw can anyone give me an short introduction how to download the
> the phpdoc via cvs ? (didnt ever use cvs)
> please an cmdline for checkout and one for commit.
http://www.php.net/anoncvs.php (substitute co php4
Hi,
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002 08:46:52 +0100
Enrico Weigelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> where should i start looking at ?
we have an old script that does manual->man page conversion (if that is
what you meant) but I don't know it it works (still). I am also sure,
that we don't use it. see
http://cvs.p
39 matches
Mail list logo
