[PHP-DOC] Question about the tools

2007-11-26 Thread Simion Onea
Hi! Could you please tell me if I am correct: First I run "autoconf". (no errors/warnings) Then I run "./configure --with-lang=ro". And it says that I have missing ids. So I cannot expect that "make test" will pass. Am I correct? Regards, Simion.

[PHP-DOC] new-reference-structure builds on docs.php.net

2007-11-26 Thread Hannes Magnusson
Hi all Just a heads up, http://docs.php.net is now building from the REF_STRUCT_DEV branch and will continue doing so until the rest of the 150 extensions have been upgraded and we can ditch the branch. It would be great if people could pitch in, upgrading couple of reference pages to the new-ref

Re: [PHP-DOC] Make PhD work with new xml:id's for methods

2007-11-26 Thread Hannes Magnusson
On Nov 26, 2007 10:17 PM, Edward Z. Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hannes Magnusson wrote: > > See bug#43416 > > Hmm... that's a nasty edge-case on an edge-case. According to the old > style, the non-OOP docs should be found at function.collator-asort, but > I can see why, for the dual style, pl

Re: [PHP-DOC] PhD builds online

2007-11-26 Thread Hannes Magnusson
On Nov 26, 2007 2:07 AM, Leonardo Boshell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 25/11/2007, Hannes Magnusson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * With the exception of Czech, Polish and Spanish which did not pass > > test_xml > > Hi, > > First of all, congratulations on your work with phd. Thanks :D > Reg

Re: [PHP-DOC] Make PhD work with new xml:id's for methods

2007-11-26 Thread Edward Z. Yang
Hannes Magnusson wrote: > See bug#43416 Hmm... that's a nasty edge-case on an edge-case. According to the old style, the non-OOP docs should be found at function.collator-asort, but I can see why, for the dual style, placing them both at collator.asort would be advantageous. There are two conside

[PHP-DOC] Documentation updates as RSS

2007-11-26 Thread Keryx Web
Hi again! I tried the site and Google to no avail. Here is my question: Can I get all updates to the manual as an RSS or ATOM feed? Or do I have to implement my own? Lars Gunther

[PHP-DOC] Ctype and PHP 6

2007-11-26 Thread Keryx Web
Hi again! And please forgive a relative newbie on the list for asking dumb questions. Am I correct in assuming that the ctype-family of functions neither is nor will be available with Unicode support in PHP 6? If so, it should perhaps be stated in the manual that these functions are not futu

Re: [PHP-DOC] Make PhD work with new xml:id's for methods

2007-11-26 Thread Hannes Magnusson
On Nov 26, 2007 6:59 PM, Edward Z. Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hannes Magnusson wrote: > > Shouldn't the underscore be replaced with dash? > > Granted that internal PHP methods are supposed to use camelCasedNames > > I bet some extension will break this convention at some point. > > Sure. We'

Re: [PHP-DOC] Make PhD work with new xml:id's for methods

2007-11-26 Thread Edward Z. Yang
Hannes Magnusson wrote: > Shouldn't the underscore be replaced with dash? > Granted that internal PHP methods are supposed to use camelCasedNames > I bet some extension will break this convention at some point. Sure. We'll get some weird names, however, such as class.-private or class.--magic, esp

Re: [PHP-DOC] Make PhD work with new xml:id's for methods

2007-11-26 Thread Hannes Magnusson
On Nov 26, 2007 3:09 AM, Edward Z. Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The new OO skeletons mandate that methods be named as > xml:id="classname.methodname". Unfortunately, PhD hasn't been taught to > handle these new names properly (Thanks Hannes!) This patch fixes this. > We may want to consider fa