On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 10:26 PM, Etienne Kneuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've experienced some crashes with runkit, caused by strange code that
> should have never worked. Apparently, its test coverage is not that
> high. Additionally it has 39 opened bugs, some of which are quite old.
> So
Hello,
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 3:29 AM, Daniel Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>(Shooting to docs and PECL-dev.)
>
>While doing an overhaul of the user notes, I noticed that many of
> the runkit functions are still marked as "experimental" in the
> documentation. Version 0.7 introduced s
(Shooting to docs and PECL-dev.)
While doing an overhaul of the user notes, I noticed that many of
the runkit functions are still marked as "experimental" in the
documentation. Version 0.7 introduced said functions in 2005, and
they were still available in the last release of 0.9 in mid-2
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Christian A. Reiter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Sorry for "spamming", but i got a error reply from sending this to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don't worry, you're not "spamming", you were following up. The
gods have forgiven you, so you're good to go! ;-P
helly Sat Jul 19 15:43:35 2008 UTC
Added files:
/php-src/ext/spl/internal recursivetreeiterator.inc
/php-src/ext/spl/tests recursive_tree_iterator_001.phpt
recursive_tree_iterator_002.phpt
Hello Jochem,
Thursday, July 17, 2008, 7:38:01 PM, you wrote:
> Marcus Boerger schreef:
>> Hello Jochem,
>>
> ...
>>> I just posted another mail to internals in which I attempt to detail the
>>> __autoload behaviour 'issues' ... it includes something that wants to be a
>>> test suite when it g
