Re: [PHP-DOC] New PECL documentation

2010-06-07 Thread Pieter de Zwart
Hey guys, Thank you for the feedback. I will get these done asap and let you know. I think I have spent more time writing and fixing documentation than writing the extension itself =) Pieter On 6/7/10 10:08 AM, "Philip Olson" wrote: > > > On Jun 7, 2010, at 12:49 AM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:

Re: [PHP-DOC] New PECL documentation

2010-06-07 Thread Philip Olson
On Jun 7, 2010, at 12:49 AM, Hannes Magnusson wrote: > On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 08:59, Pieter de Zwart > wrote: >> Hey guys, >> >> Since build happens Friday, I waited till now so that I can get a solid week >> of feedback before this gets included in the main docs. I committed revs >> 300253 and

Re: [PHP-DOC] Revchecks outdated

2010-06-07 Thread Philip Olson
On Jun 7, 2010, at 8:22 AM, Mark Wiesemann wrote: > Philip Olson wrote: >> On May 21, 2010, at 1:31 PM, Mark Wiesemann wrote: >>> the revchecks on doc.php.net haven't been updated since May 2nd, e.g.: >>> http://doc.php.net/php/de/revcheck.php?p=translators >>> http://doc.php.net/php/fr/revcheck.

Re: [PHP-DOC] How to document 'not implemented, sorta' stuff?

2010-06-07 Thread Philip Olson
On Jun 7, 2010, at 8:11 AM, G. T. Stresen-Reuter wrote: > On Jun 7, 2010, at 3:47 PM, Philip Olson wrote: > >> >> There are several features in PHP that are "not implemented [yet]", >> including roughly 13 DOM classes. Well, they are sorta (but not really) >> implemented. >> >> How should we

Re: [PHP-DOC] Revchecks outdated

2010-06-07 Thread Mark Wiesemann
Philip Olson wrote: > On May 21, 2010, at 1:31 PM, Mark Wiesemann wrote: >> the revchecks on doc.php.net haven't been updated since May 2nd, e.g.: >> http://doc.php.net/php/de/revcheck.php?p=translators >> http://doc.php.net/php/fr/revcheck.php?p=translators >> >> Can somebody please take a look at

Re: [PHP-DOC] How to document 'not implemented, sorta' stuff?

2010-06-07 Thread G. T. Stresen-Reuter
On Jun 7, 2010, at 3:47 PM, Philip Olson wrote: > > There are several features in PHP that are "not implemented [yet]", including > roughly 13 DOM classes. Well, they are sorta (but not really) implemented. > > How should we deal with this? Just my 2ยข but if something is not (yet) implemented,

[PHP-DOC] How to document 'not implemented, sorta' stuff?

2010-06-07 Thread Philip Olson
There are several features in PHP that are "not implemented [yet]", including roughly 13 DOM classes. Well, they are sorta (but not really) implemented. How should we deal with this? Two types of "not implemented": 1. New things, like classes, methods and functions. Easier, and more straight

Re: [PHP-DOC] New PECL documentation

2010-06-07 Thread Hannes Magnusson
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 08:59, Pieter de Zwart wrote: > Hey guys, > > Since build happens Friday, I waited till now so that I can get a solid week > of feedback before this gets included in the main docs. I committed revs > 300253 and 300254. > I would really appreciate it if someone could give it

Re: [PHP-DOC] New PECL documentation

2010-06-07 Thread Pieter de Zwart
Hey guys, Since build happens Friday, I waited till now so that I can get a solid week of feedback before this gets included in the main docs. I committed revs 300253 and 300254. I would really appreciate it if someone could give it a look over to make sure I am following standards and procedures.