> > Okay this sounds good. Btw, Derick does your magic involve using
> > the html tag? Like (in HTML):
> >
> > WWW
>
> Yeah, but unfortunatley the docbook specs dont allow the title
> attribute, so I had to hack my dtds.
I don't think the title should go there, only in a central file
suc
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Philip Olson wrote:
> Okay this sounds good. Btw, Derick does your magic involve using
> the html tag? Like (in HTML):
>
> WWW
Yeah, but unfortunatley the docbook specs dont allow the title
attribute, so I had to hack my dtds.
> Curious. Adding this feature would be
>
> > > I'm not familiar with XSLT and on my TODO is to figure out
> > > how to implement this. I assume it'll exist as:
> > >
> > > CVS
> > >
> > > And when someone uses them they'll add the info into acronyms.xml
> > > Also, make test will check for this. The terms will then link to
> > >
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
> > I'm not familiar with XSLT and on my TODO is to figure out
> > how to implement this. I assume it'll exist as:
> >
> > CVS
> >
> > And when someone uses them they'll add the info into acronyms.xml
> > Also, make test will check for this. The term
> I'm not familiar with XSLT and on my TODO is to figure out
> how to implement this. I assume it'll exist as:
>
> CVS
>
> And when someone uses them they'll add the info into acronyms.xml
> Also, make test will check for this. The terms will then link to
> the appropriate acronyms entry in
> > How about instead we use, for example, the tag (or
> > similar) so:
> >
> > CVS
> >
> > And in acronyms.xml we would list a definition for such terms.
> > I don't know if is the appropriate tag but the
> > idea is what's important here. I prefer this method.
>
> Yes, this is nice.
I'm
> -Original Message-
> From: Philip Olson [mailto:philip@;cornado.com]
> Sent: 08 November 2002 21:32
> To: Ford, Mike [LSS]
>
> How about instead we use, for example, the tag (or
> similar) so:
>
> CVS
>
> And in acronyms.xml we would list a definition for such terms.
> I don't know
> How about instead we use, for example, the tag (or
> similar) so:
>
> CVS
>
> And in acronyms.xml we would list a definition for such terms.
> I don't know if is the appropriate tag but the
> idea is what's important here. I prefer this method.
This would be cool ;)
Goba
--
PHP Docum
> This illustrates a point I've mentioned before. Speaking as someone who
> spent 10 years or so as a technical author/editor, I very much think the
> term CVS should be banned in end-user-oriented documentation (including
> the bug-reporting system!). If someone has never come across a
> version
> > "This function is only available in CVS. "
> > i dont' understand the sentence above.
[snip]
> This illustrates a point I've mentioned before. Speaking as someone
> who spent 10 years or so as a technical author/editor, I very much
> think the term CVS should be banned in end-user-oriented
> -Original Message-
> From: Avenger [mailto:avengerphp@;hotmail.com]
> Sent: 08 November 2002 08:48
>
> This function 's description say:
>
> "This function is only available in CVS. "
>
> i dont' understand the sentence above.
>
> can ftp_close use in CVS?
>
> or CVS has otherwise me
It means that someone put that there when
they shouldn't have. When these docs were
written this function was only available
in CVS. In otherwords, it wasn't available
outside the PHP4 source tree or in any current
PHP distribution. Until PHP 4.2.0 that is.
I just deleted this note and did a m
This function 's description say:
"This function is only available in CVS. "
i dont' understand the sentence above.
can ftp_close use in CVS?
or CVS has otherwise mean?
Thanks..
--
PHP Documentation Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
13 matches
Mail list logo
