Re: [PHP-DOC] Bug #28405 fix

2004-05-20 Thread Derick Rethans
On Thu, 20 May 2004, Philip Olson wrote: > According to bug report #21007 the note *was* correct. This strange > misbehavior was fixed March 18, 2003 here: > > http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/php-src/ext/standard/info.c?r1=1.228&r2=1.229 > > So it appears the problem only existed in 4.3.0-1 but I can

Re: [PHP-DOC] Bug #28405 fix

2004-05-20 Thread Philip Olson
On Thu, 20 May 2004, Derick Rethans wrote: > On Thu, 20 May 2004, Nuno Lopes wrote: > > > > I havn't commited bug fixes yet, and when I was going to commit > > > this fix, I recall there being a special syntax to add in you > > > comment to signify that this commit is for a specific bug? Or am I

Re: [PHP-DOC] Bug #28405 fix

2004-05-20 Thread Derick Rethans
On Thu, 20 May 2004, Nuno Lopes wrote: > > I havn't commited bug fixes yet, and when I was going to commit > > this fix, I recall there being a special syntax to add in you > > comment to signify that this commit is for a specific bug? Or am I > > dreaming up some imaginary thing? > > > > Accordi

Re: [PHP-DOC] Bug #28405 fix

2004-05-20 Thread Nuno Lopes
> I havn't commited bug fixes yet, and when I was going to commit > this fix, I recall there being a special syntax to add in you > comment to signify that this commit is for a specific bug? Or am I > dreaming up some imaginary thing? > > According to derick, this statement shouldn't even be there

[PHP-DOC] Bug #28405 fix

2004-05-19 Thread Curt Zirzow
I havn't commited bug fixes yet, and when I was going to commit this fix, I recall there being a special syntax to add in you comment to signify that this commit is for a specific bug? Or am I dreaming up some imaginary thing? According to derick, this statement shouldn't even be there. http://