Re: [PHP-DOC] DOM Extension in PHP5

2004-01-03 Thread Ken Tossell
Okay, thanks for your replies. I've been playing with the DomDocument a bit, and the code is making a little more sense. I see that the classes are made up of aliases. That is, the member functions are aliases to procedural PHP_FUNCTION()s... I think. In this case, what do we document? The OO a

Re: [PHP-DOC] DOM Extension in PHP5

2004-01-03 Thread Derick Rethans
On Sat, 3 Jan 2004, Gabor Hojtsy wrote: > > It looks like domxml in /ext has been renamed to /dom -- and rewritten? > > Does this mean we need to start a new dom manual section to document it? I > > see that there's quite a bit on 'domxml,' but a lot of functions (in > > php5's /ext/dom) are missi

Re: [PHP-DOC] DOM Extension in PHP5

2004-01-03 Thread Gabor Hojtsy
It looks like domxml in /ext has been renamed to /dom -- and rewritten? Does this mean we need to start a new dom manual section to document it? I see that there's quite a bit on 'domxml,' but a lot of functions (in php5's /ext/dom) are missing. Where might I find information about these functi

[PHP-DOC] DOM Extension in PHP5

2004-01-03 Thread Ken Tossell
Hi, It looks like domxml in /ext has been renamed to /dom -- and rewritten? Does this mean we need to start a new dom manual section to document it? I see that there's quite a bit on 'domxml,' but a lot of functions (in php5's /ext/dom) are missing. Where might I find information about these f