Re: [PHP-DOC] Docs for dom extension

2004-04-30 Thread Gabor Hojtsy
For example: domxml include file when rendered as html overwrites the one for the dom extension. Also, here is a snippet of the xml to make sure this is being done correctly (for the refentry I followed the SOAP docs and making it case sensitive): IDs should be lower case. The problem of having ID

Re: [PHP-DOC] Docs for dom extension

2004-04-30 Thread Rob Richards
> > And on my question about the function tag, Derick you were right, though the > > function tag isnt needed. just using: > > functionname works great. Thanks > > But then it won't add the () automatically ;-) I noticed that, but the () ends up outside of the link which just looks really weird :)

Re: [PHP-DOC] Docs for dom extension

2004-04-30 Thread Derick Rethans
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Rob Richards wrote: > > Nuno Lopes wrote: > > > > The problem of having IDs in lower case is that they broke livedocs. > > > Livedocs needs that IDs are equal to function names. > > > > Maybe we should hack livedocs to change this instead of adding more fuzz > > in the XML fil

Re: [PHP-DOC] Docs for dom extension

2004-04-30 Thread Rob Richards
> Nuno Lopes wrote: > > The problem of having IDs in lower case is that they broke livedocs. > > Livedocs needs that IDs are equal to function names. > > Maybe we should hack livedocs to change this instead of adding more fuzz > in the XML files :) If livedocs depend upon the ID, then it wouldnt

Re: [PHP-DOC] Docs for dom extension

2004-04-30 Thread Nuno Lopes
> >>IDs should be lower case. > > > > > > > > The problem of having IDs in lower case is that they broke livedocs. > > Livedocs needs that IDs are equal to function names. > > Maybe we should hack livedocs to change this instead of adding more fuzz > in the XML files :) > > didou I still don't un

Re: [PHP-DOC] Docs for dom extension

2004-04-30 Thread Derick Rethans
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Nuno Lopes wrote: > > IDs should be lower case. > > The problem of having IDs in lower case is that they broke livedocs. > Livedocs needs that IDs are equal to function names. Then fix that. PHP has no case sensitive function names, so just doing strtolower() works fine there

Re: [PHP-DOC] Docs for dom extension

2004-04-30 Thread Mehdi Achour
Nuno Lopes wrote: For example: domxml include file when rendered as html overwrites the one for the dom extension. Also, here is a snippet of the xml to make sure this is being done correctly (for the refentry I followed the SOAP docs and making it case sensitive): IDs should be lower case. The

Re: [PHP-DOC] Docs for dom extension

2004-04-30 Thread Nuno Lopes
> > For example: domxml include file when rendered as html overwrites the > > one for the dom extension. Also, here is a snippet of the xml to make > > sure this is being done correctly (for the refentry I followed the > > SOAP docs and making it case sensitive): > > > > > > IDs should be lower ca

Re: [PHP-DOC] Docs for dom extension

2004-04-30 Thread Derick Rethans
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Rob Richards wrote: > So does it make sense that I should be appending dom- to the functions as > well to avoid collisions with the domxml documentation? > > i.e. Well, no other choice is there? > And in doing so is there a way to change the text disaplyed when using a > fu

Re: [PHP-DOC] Docs for dom extension

2004-04-30 Thread Rob Richards
From: "Derick Rethans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For example: domxml include file when rendered as html overwrites the > > one for the dom extension. Also, here is a snippet of the xml to make > > sure this is being done correctly (for the refentry I followed the > > SOAP docs and making it case sen

Re: [PHP-DOC] Docs for dom extension

2004-04-30 Thread Derick Rethans
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Rob Richards wrote: > For example: domxml include file when rendered as html overwrites the > one for the dom extension. Also, here is a snippet of the xml to make > sure this is being done correctly (for the refentry I followed the > SOAP docs and making it case sensitive): >

[PHP-DOC] Docs for dom extension

2004-04-30 Thread Rob Richards
I'm trying to write up some docs for the dom extension and have a few questions.This is the first time writing up docs here so I was following the domxml extension on naming things. I ran into an issue however withDOMDocument_xinclude as the naming ends up being the same for both extensions