Re: [PHP-DOC] Functions without examples - datetime

2005-04-03 Thread David Mytton
Sean Coates wrote: The data at http://www.phpdoc.info/meta/ has been inaccurate for at least as long (less than a week, though), as these scripts used to be located in a different place, and I forgot to update the config. (I have them half moved to docweb, but.. time constraints...) The

[PHP-DOC] Functions without examples - datetime

2005-04-02 Thread David Mytton
Hi, I'm having a look at the functions without examples to see if I can go and add some in. I was wondering what constitutes having examples. I used the datetime functions quite a bit and notice that the time() function is listed as not having examples, but going to www.php.net/time shows up

Re: [PHP-DOC] Functions without examples - datetime

2005-04-02 Thread Dave Barr
David Mytton wrote: Hi, I'm having a look at the functions without examples to see if I can go and add some in. I was wondering what constitutes having examples. I used the datetime functions quite a bit and notice that the time() function is listed as not having examples, but going to

Re: [PHP-DOC] Functions without examples - datetime

2005-04-02 Thread Sean Coates
The time() function does indeed not have examples. The example you see on that page is from a user-contributed note which doesn't count. I added an example to time() earlier this week. See: http://cvs.php.net/co.php/phpdoc/en/reference/datetime/functions/time.xml?r=1.5 The data at

Re: [PHP-DOC] Functions without examples - datetime

2005-04-02 Thread Dave Barr
Philip Olson wrote: I'm having a look at the functions without examples to see if I can go and add some in. I was wondering what constitutes having examples. I used the datetime functions quite a bit and notice that the time() function is listed as not having examples, but going to

Re: [PHP-DOC] Functions without examples - datetime

2005-04-02 Thread Sean Coates
Dave Barr wrote: Last updated from CVS: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 04:55:31 -0500 (46d 17h 56m 46s ago) oops. When I said less than a week I was wrong. I meant less than a decade. (-: S