Re: [PHP-DOC] Fwd: [PHP-NOTES] note 19739 added to function.is-uploaded-file

2002-03-09 Thread Andrew Lindeman
OK, is what I commited alright? --Andrew On Saturday 09 March 2002 12:22 pm, Lars Torben Wilson wrote: > Andrew Lindeman writes: > > OK, I think I made it a little more clear. Commited to CVS. > > Actually, it was worded like that because it that function will not > properly check for uploaded

Re: [PHP-DOC] Fwd: [PHP-NOTES] note 19739 added to function.is-uploaded-file

2002-03-09 Thread Lars Torben Wilson
Andrew Lindeman writes: > OK, I think I made it a little more clear. Commited to CVS. Actually, it was worded like that because it that function will not properly check for uploaded files in versions of PHP after 4.0.2, regardless of what it's called. For instance, if the internal is_uploaded_fi

Re: [PHP-DOC] Fwd: [PHP-NOTES] note 19739 added to function.is-uploaded-file

2002-03-09 Thread Andrew Lindeman
OK, I think I made it a little more clear. Commited to CVS. On Saturday 09 March 2002 11:59 am, Sander Roobol wrote: > On 2002.03.09 18:33 Andrew Lindeman wrote: > > Should I change the docs or is that correct? See the note below > > That note is about the example. That script won't work on PH

Re: [PHP-DOC] Fwd: [PHP-NOTES] note 19739 added to function.is-uploaded-file

2002-03-09 Thread Sander Roobol
On 2002.03.09 18:33 Andrew Lindeman wrote: > Should I change the docs or is that correct? See the note below That note is about the example. That script won't work on PHP after 4.0.2 because is_uploaded_file() is already defined. The note is correct, but it should be more clear that it's about

[PHP-DOC] Fwd: [PHP-NOTES] note 19739 added to function.is-uploaded-file

2002-03-09 Thread Andrew Lindeman
Should I change the docs or is that correct? See the note below --Andrew -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: [PHP-NOTES] note 19739 added to function.is-uploaded-file Date: 9 Mar 2002 06:24:32 - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Note: This will not work in ver