Re: [PHP-DOC] PCRE syntax update

2005-03-18 Thread Nuno Lopes
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 20:27:11 -, Nuno Lopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > PHP is bundled with PCRE 4.3 for a long time ago > (http://www.zend.com/lists/php-dev/200306/msg00844.html), but the PCRE > syntax manual section has not been updated to reflect this change up > to now. Thats not to

Re: [PHP-DOC] PCRE syntax update

2005-03-17 Thread gerzson
> > Yes, we need to update it. And as PCRE 5 will probably be bundled in php > > 5.1, we will have even more work. > > Wow, that sounds great! Is there any publicly available docs about the > new features? Oops, I actually looked my hairy old local copy of pcre.txt file, sorry. -- Papp, Gyozo

Re: [PHP-DOC] PCRE syntax update

2005-03-17 Thread gerzson
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 20:27:11 -, Nuno Lopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > PHP is bundled with PCRE 4.3 for a long time ago > > (http://www.zend.com/lists/php-dev/200306/msg00844.html), but the PCRE > > syntax manual section has not been updated to reflect this change up > > to now.

Re: [PHP-DOC] PCRE syntax update

2005-03-17 Thread Nuno Lopes
Hi, PHP is bundled with PCRE 4.3 for a long time ago (http://www.zend.com/lists/php-dev/200306/msg00844.html), but the PCRE syntax manual section has not been updated to reflect this change up to now. Thats not totally true, as I've already documented some changes. My question is that pcre/pattern

Re: [PHP-DOC] PCRE syntax update

2005-03-16 Thread Derick Rethans
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, gerzson wrote: My question is that pcre/pattern.syntax.xml section should be updated borrowing the necessary texts from the PCRE documentation as it was the habit before or is there any issue blocking this attempt? If not so, I'm preparing myself to do the merge. Please do so

[PHP-DOC] PCRE syntax update

2005-03-16 Thread gerzson
Hi, PHP is bundled with PCRE 4.3 for a long time ago (http://www.zend.com/lists/php-dev/200306/msg00844.html), but the PCRE syntax manual section has not been updated to reflect this change up to now. My question is that pcre/pattern.syntax.xml section should be updated borrowing the necessary te