On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:49:21 -0400
Daniel Convissor wrote:
> Hi Hannes:
>
> > Like with the PHP4 OO docs, they should either be removed or at most
> > refactored into an appendix.
>
> Yeah, the appendix is a good place for that.
>
>
> > Even
> > the functions versioninfo, there is no reason to
Hi Hannes:
> Like with the PHP4 OO docs, they should either be removed or at most
> refactored into an appendix.
Yeah, the appendix is a good place for that.
> Even
> the functions versioninfo, there is no reason to mention PHP4 anymore.
I disagree. It can be helpful to know when a function w
On Oct 3, 2009, at 8:51 AM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 17:33, Álvaro G. Vicario
wrote:
2009/10/3 Hannes Magnusson :
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 14:56, Rich Bowen wrote:
Is there a continuing need to cover PHP4 in the installation
documentation?
Ideally, nobody is installin
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 17:33, Álvaro G. Vicario wrote:
> 2009/10/3 Hannes Magnusson :
>> On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 14:56, Rich Bowen wrote:
>>> Is there a continuing need to cover PHP4 in the installation documentation?
>>> Ideally, nobody is installing PHP4. Should we really be encouraging them to
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 14:56, Rich Bowen wrote:
> Is there a continuing need to cover PHP4 in the installation documentation?
> Ideally, nobody is installing PHP4. Should we really be encouraging them to
> do so?
>
> My inclination is to remove references to PHP4 in the install docs, but I
> wante
Is there a continuing need to cover PHP4 in the installation
documentation? Ideally, nobody is installing PHP4. Should we really be
encouraging them to do so?
My inclination is to remove references to PHP4 in the install docs,
but I wanted to see if there was wider consensus on this.
--
R
