On Dec 3, 2007 9:35 PM, Edward Z. Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> > IMO it shouldn't, not. They should look at the "class view" if they
> > want further details on how its defined, the 'detailed property'
> > listing should only contain the description of it.
>
> Ok, tha
Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> IMO it shouldn't, not. They should look at the "class view" if they
> want further details on how its defined, the 'detailed property'
> listing should only contain the description of it.
Ok, that sounds fine. It might, then, be useful to have a link back from
the detaile
On Dec 1, 2007 8:03 AM, Edward Z. Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's often extra information such as type, readonly and initializer
> that can be specified in the classsynopsis. Should this information be
> duplicated below in the detailed property location? (I don't think so,
> but I do thi
There's often extra information such as type, readonly and initializer
that can be specified in the classsynopsis. Should this information be
duplicated below in the detailed property location? (I don't think so,
but I do think it should be re-displayed below there).
--
Edward Z. Yang
