On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
> > http://php.net/docprob
> > http://php.net/phpnet
>
> If we go on this way, then we really should restrict these shortcuts
> in number as php.net's shortcut namespace is quite overcrowded with
> PHP page shortcuts, manual page shortcuts and even shortcu
> What about just 'php.net/addbug'?
Well, I never wanted to direct guys to the add form directly. That would
not be good, as our rules show, they need to search for bugs with the same
content, etc...
What I wanted to add are only those two "add bug" links to use
in mail replys when someone posts
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
> > > Just thinking about adding new URL shortcuts to ease this type of
> advice.
> > > I can think of two shortcuts needed to open new bugs for website and doc
> > > problems:
> > >
> > > http://php.net/bug/docprob
> > > http://php.net/bug/phpnet
> > >
On a related note, doc bugs deserve a "doc feature request" category
as some of these so called doc bugs are cool but they're feature
requests not bugs.
Regarding shortcuts, I don't think we need them as it takes almost
as much time to remember and type them as it does to use the
select box.
> > Just thinking about adding new URL shortcuts to ease this type of
advice.
> > I can think of two shortcuts needed to open new bugs for website and doc
> > problems:
> >
> > http://php.net/bug/docprob
> > http://php.net/bug/phpnet
> >
> > Is this ok, or do you have better ideas or you think
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
> Just thinking about adding new URL shortcuts to ease this type of advice.
> I can think of two shortcuts needed to open new bugs for website and doc
> problems:
>
> http://php.net/bug/docprob
> http://php.net/bug/phpnet
>
> Is this ok, or do you hav
> > I think this really badly documented in the documentation. I hope this
is
> > solved soon. To be more detailed: The preg_replace_callback()-function
> > documentation says it is the same as the preg_replacec()-function,
except
> > for the second argument. Apparently, it is not, since it doe
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Bikeman wrote:
> Me again.
>
> I think this really badly documented in the documentation. I hope this is
> solved soon. To be more detailed: The preg_replace_callback()-function
> documentation says it is the same as the preg_replacec()-function, except
> for the second ar
Me again.
I think this really badly documented in the documentation. I hope this is
solved soon. To be more detailed: The preg_replace_callback()-function
documentation says it is the same as the preg_replacec()-function, except
for the second argument. Apparently, it is not, since it doesn't
Please make all replies to this ONLY go to php-general, thank you.
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, John W. Holmes wrote:
> "callback" should be the name of a function that determines what the
> matched pattern will be replaced with.
>
> Maybe you just need the regular preg_replace(), instead of the on
"callback" should be the name of a function that determines what the
matched pattern will be replaced with.
Maybe you just need the regular preg_replace(), instead of the one with
callback?
---John Holmes...
> -Original Message-
> From: Bikeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday,
11 matches
Mail list logo
