Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: PHP documentation authors / editors and license

2003-02-12 Thread Zak Greant
erg2000> From: "Cornelia Boenigk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Egon Schmid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Zak Greant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject

Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: PHP documentation authors / editors and license

2003-02-12 Thread Gabor Hojtsy
Please be so kind, and provide some tips on how to get some answes from those authors and editors listed, as they don't seem to even read the mails we sent out through the months. It seems that we only need to be concerned about: - Jouni Ahto - Alexander Aulbach Anyone tried conta

Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: PHP documentation authors / editors and license

2003-02-11 Thread Zak Greant
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 04:36:59PM -0700, Zak Greant wrote: ... Here is a brief update. > > Please be so kind, and provide some tips on how to get some answes from > > those authors and editors listed, as they don't seem to even read the > > mails we sent out through the months. > > It see

Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: PHP documentation authors / editors and license

2003-02-03 Thread Ronald Chmara
On Sunday, February 2, 2003, at 03:13 AM, Zak Greant wrote: Heh. The content is already in docbook and the user notes are mostly useless already. ;) *wakes from a long slumber* Depends on coding style (the notes), doesn't it? I used to bitch about PHP2->3 migrations, now I have 3->4, and

Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: PHP documentation authors / editors and license

2003-02-02 Thread Philip Olson
On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Zak Greant wrote: > On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 09:22:43PM +0100, Maxim Maletsky wrote: > ... > > > Heh. The content is already in docbook and the user notes are mostly > > > useless already. ;) > > > > I hope you meant they are outdated in some parts. Because, the user > > no

Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: PHP documentation authors / editors and license

2003-02-02 Thread Zak Greant
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 09:22:43PM +0100, Maxim Maletsky wrote: ... > > Heh. The content is already in docbook and the user notes are mostly > > useless already. ;) > > I hope you meant they are outdated in some parts. Because, the user > notes are very very usefull for tons of people. It 1) s

Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: PHP documentation authors / editors and license

2003-02-02 Thread Maxim Maletsky
On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 21:33:01 +0100 Gabor Hojtsy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What I would also like to see in user notes are the examples. Something > > that allows someone to choose whether it is a note or this adds an > > additional example of usage for the given function. > > > > Not sure i

Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: PHP documentation authors / editors and license

2003-02-02 Thread Gabor Hojtsy
What I would also like to see in user notes are the examples. Something that allows someone to choose whether it is a note or this adds an additional example of usage for the given function. Not sure if I render you the idea, but the point is to have a comments of the function and the code serving

Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: PHP documentation authors / editors and license

2003-02-02 Thread Maxim Maletsky
On Sun, 2 Feb 2003 03:13:46 -0700 Zak Greant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 10:43:33AM +0100, Gabor Hojtsy wrote: > ... > > > Hrm. Maybe we could use the work in the PHP Function Essential > > > Reference as the starting point for a new set of docs? At the publish > > >

Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: PHP documentation authors / editors and license

2003-02-02 Thread Gabor Hojtsy
>>Well, I think starting off with the new contents is not a good idea. >>First it will be a long time to complete the DocBook version, second thw >>user notes on pages will go useless, as they relate to the current >>documentation and not the book's text. So I think if we can use the >>contents the

Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: PHP documentation authors / editors and license

2003-02-02 Thread Zak Greant
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 10:43:33AM +0100, Gabor Hojtsy wrote: ... > > Hrm. Maybe we could use the work in the PHP Function Essential > > Reference as the starting point for a new set of docs? At the publish > > date, it covered a large portion of PHP. > > > > This would avoid the licensing iss

Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: PHP documentation authors / editors and license

2003-02-02 Thread Gabor Hojtsy
Yep. My new editor at Sams has agreed to allow me to integrate my material from the PHP Functions Essential Reference into the PHP documentation. This should mean that when we work on the second edition, we can do a full review of the major extensions of the manual. Cool ;) Hrm. Ma

[PHP-DOC] Re: PHP documentation authors / editors and license

2003-02-02 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
> All the rest (Andrei, Jim, Stig and Rasmus) are active and AFAIK > support this. Yup, which I have stated many times to anybody who would care to listen. -Rasmus -- PHP Documentation Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

[PHP-DOC] Re: PHP documentation authors / editors and license

2003-02-01 Thread Zak Greant
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 09:08:14PM +0100, Gabor Hojtsy wrote: ... > As the current legal thing goes, we need permission from the authors to > change the license, and to add new authors. > > _None_ of the authors or editors listed on the manual fontpage (the > legal copyright holders) contribute