Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: phpdoc to SVN (was: Re: PHP Function List)

2007-03-18 Thread techtonik
Farewell then. :p On 3/18/07, Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, 18 Mar 2007, techtonik wrote: > So, to resume - what are the reasons against SVN left? There is nothing against it, but there is no compelling reason to switch either. It won't happen, so I would suggest to focus y

Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: phpdoc to SVN (was: Re: PHP Function List)

2007-03-18 Thread Derick Rethans
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007, techtonik wrote: > So, to resume - what are the reasons against SVN left? There is nothing against it, but there is no compelling reason to switch either. It won't happen, so I would suggest to focus your energy on something else. regards, Derick

[PHP-DOC] Re: phpdoc to SVN (was: Re: PHP Function List)

2007-03-18 Thread techtonik
On 3/17/07, Sean Coates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What files are you looking for? If they are actually _gone_ from CVS, then someone meddled with the CVS server. There are very few people who have access to the repository, directly. If someone did this, I'll complain to the systems people, and