On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 10:26 PM, Etienne Kneuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've experienced some crashes with runkit, caused by strange code that
> should have never worked. Apparently, its test coverage is not that
> high. Additionally it has 39 opened bugs, some of which are quite old.
> So
Hello,
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 3:29 AM, Daniel Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>(Shooting to docs and PECL-dev.)
>
>While doing an overhaul of the user notes, I noticed that many of
> the runkit functions are still marked as "experimental" in the
> documentation. Version 0.7 introduced s
(Shooting to docs and PECL-dev.)
While doing an overhaul of the user notes, I noticed that many of
the runkit functions are still marked as "experimental" in the
documentation. Version 0.7 introduced said functions in 2005, and
they were still available in the last release of 0.9 in mid-2
