Hi there,
missed that one, but I feel obliged to explain the revcheck-system to
one of the authors:
> Since there are over 1500 files without the normal Revision tag and over
> 700 without the EN Revision, including the "normal" could be done
> better by a shell sript or so, than doing this al
Hi Jan,
> +1 for having them in (it does not harm anybody)
for which reason? Just for having 25kB Overhead?
> -1 for inconsitency. mark tried to have all files similar (as he pointed
> out in a previous mail).
As I've wrote already to Mark: If there's no reason than consistency,
why not go t
> AFAIK we had them in all files before the split.
> Some have them in, some dont. I just wanted to
> put a straight line.
Hi Mark,
that's simply not true. Jeroen implemented them 1 year ago into the
EN-files (EN!) as a basis for the revcheck-system (compares them with
the revcheck-tag in the
> +1 for having them in (it does not harm anybody)
> -1 for inconsitency. mark tried to have all files similar (as he pointed
> out in a previous mail).
Since there are over 1500 files without the normal Revision tag and over
700 without the EN Revision, including the "normal" could be done
bet
Hi,
On Fri, 31 May 2002 21:26:37 +0200
Thomas Schöfbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But please leave them out from files you don't work on (especially
mine,
> IMHO they're just overhead).
+1 for having them in (it does not harm anybody)
-1 for inconsitency. mark tried to have all files similar
> But please leave them out from files you don't work on (especially mine,
> IMHO they're just overhead).
Mhh, I ask back: Why? ;)
AFAIK we had them in all files before the split.
Some have them in, some dont. I just wanted to
put a straight line.
Mark
--
German Gabber Network @ http://www.g
Hi Mark,
Since your last message was empty I can't see whom you wanted to help
with this action, but in general I'd like to say:
If you want these tags in your files for a special reason or kind of
working, no problem.
But please leave them out from files you don't work on (especially mine,
Mark Kronsbein wrote:
> mkFri May 31 13:24:52 2002 EDT
>
> Modified files:
> /phpdoc-de/reference/apache reference.xml
Hi,
please ignore, what I am doing ,)
I just want to have all files build up the same way.
This means for me:
...CONTENTS OF THE FIL
