> Hm, I can't think of any reason, why not to use integer.
> In /language/types.xml it is used this way and correctly renderd by
> the dsl-sheets (html-common.dsl)line 160:
> ;; Linking types to the correct place
> ...
> One difference:
> integer: the resulting link is bold, while
> integer is "no
>> I myself would like to see some more entities :-)
>> In the constanst.xml there are a lot of links to integer-types,
>> e.g. /refernce/curl/constansts.xml
>> like:
>> integer
>> For this it would be convinient to have an entity, also for other
>> links to language.types.
>> Opinions?
> There u
> I myself would like to see some more entities :-)
> In the constanst.xml there are a lot of links to integer-types,
> e.g. /refernce/curl/constansts.xml
> like:
> integer
> For this it would be convinient to have an entity, also for other
> links to language.types.
> Opinions?
There used to be
Hi
I myself would like to see some more entities :-)
In the constanst.xml there are a lot of links to integer-types,
e.g. /refernce/curl/constansts.xml
like:
integer
For this it would be convinient to have an entity, also for other
links to language.types.
Opinions?
Friedhelm
