Hi:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 01:17:25PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> centos/RHEL, PHP 5.3-related packages are extremely easy to come by.
> it may be that you have to look for the generally-approved repos (in
> this case, http://rpms.famillecollet.com/enterprise/5/, among others),
> but they
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Christopher Jones wrote:
> On 03/22/2010 04:42 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> >and regarding installation, i would *strongly* encourage
> > readers to install from packages if they can, leaving downloading
> > and building the source as a last resort only. virtually ever
On 03/22/2010 04:42 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
and regarding installation, i would *strongly* encourage readers to
install from packages if they can, leaving downloading and building
the source as a last resort only. virtually every OS these days
should have PHP and related packages ready
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Richard Quadling wrote:
> On 21 March 2010 14:15, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > i wasn't suggesting reproducing the entire command-line section.
> > i was more thinking along the lines of something early in the
> > installation section, maybe a very first section, "how can y
On 21 March 2010 14:15, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Mar 2010, Philip Olson wrote:
>
>> On Mar 20, 2010, at 8:00 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
>> > * very early on, i might be tempted to have a short section
>> > explaining how readers can examine the current state of PHP on
>> > their sys
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010, Philip Olson wrote:
> On Mar 20, 2010, at 8:00 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > * very early on, i might be tempted to have a short section
> > explaining how readers can examine the current state of PHP on
> > their system, mostly from the command line. when i was starting
>
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010, Philip Olson wrote:
> On Mar 20, 2010, at 8:00 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > "... extends the feature set adding SimpleXML and XMLReader support."
> >
> > - is there a reason to mention XMLReader but not XMLWriter? (what
> >*is* the state of XML support in PHP these
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010, Philip Olson wrote:
> On Mar 20, 2010, at 8:00 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > * not sure if this is covered further into the manual than i've
> > read so far, but i learned quickly that on some versions of linux
> > (in my case, fedora), a *lot* of the PHP modules and extens
first short reply before i must dash for a bit ...
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010, Philip Olson wrote:
> On Mar 20, 2010, at 8:00 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > it's not clear what version of PHP the online manual refers to.
> > i would *guess* that it's the output of a fairly recent build of
> > the d
On Mar 20, 2010, at 8:00 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> (my technical editor streak coming to the fore, representing just
> some thoughts on reading up to but not including the language
> reference so far.)
>
> * it's not clear what version of PHP the online manual refers to. i
> would *gues
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> - it might be worth telling the reader about "php --ini" here, and
> perhaps other ini-related php CLI options. i found the above
> comment really useful early on.
bah ... i meant the above "command", not "comment".
rday
--
===
(my technical editor streak coming to the fore, representing just
some thoughts on reading up to but not including the language
reference so far.)
* it's not clear what version of PHP the online manual refers to. i
would *guess* that it's the output of a fairly recent build of the
doc trunk, b
12 matches
Mail list logo
