RE: [PHP-DOC] document generated HTML

2002-01-30 Thread Stig S. Bakken
gt; > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Egon Schmid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 8:38 PM > > > > To: James Cox; phpdoc > > > > Subject: Re: [PHP-DOC] document generated HTML >

RE: [PHP-DOC] document generated HTML

2002-01-29 Thread James Cox
i'm saying that some browsers (usually old, underdeveloped) choke on strange html. However, that's probably not even an important consideration :) James

Re: [PHP-DOC] document generated HTML

2002-01-29 Thread Egon Schmid
> From: Egon Schmid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 9:08 PM > > To: James Cox; phpdoc > > Subject: Re: [PHP-DOC] document generated HTML > > > > > > From: "James Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > oh well, l

RE: [PHP-DOC] document generated HTML

2002-01-29 Thread James Cox
yeah, but for some clients, i guess adding new lines etc may confuse them. if it works, it works. James > -Original Message- > From: Egon Schmid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 9:08 PM > To: James Cox; phpdoc > Subject: Re: [PHP-DOC] document

Re: [PHP-DOC] document generated HTML

2002-01-29 Thread Egon Schmid
correct (almost all time, if someone doesn´t correct the errors in the XML source :) -Egon > > -Original Message- > > From: Egon Schmid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 8:38 PM > > To: James Cox; phpdoc > > Subject: Re: [PHP-DOC]

RE: [PHP-DOC] document generated HTML

2002-01-29 Thread James Cox
oh well, lets hope that no-one inspects our html :) James > -Original Message- > From: Egon Schmid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 8:38 PM > To: James Cox; phpdoc > Subject: Re: [PHP-DOC] document generated HTML > > > From: "

Re: [PHP-DOC] document generated HTML

2002-01-29 Thread Egon Schmid
From: "James Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > has anyone else noticed that the generated HTML sucks, and is there a way to > fix this? No, if we use Jade. -Egon