> I still havent added more examples and the object properties.
> Could use some help on the addition of properties.
Tomorow I'll take a look at the link you sent us to check how to integrate
them in the docs.
> I took a look at mysqli, but the properties there also had a corresponding
> procedu
The files are commited, but the only change was to change the tabs to
spaces.
I still havent added more examples and the object properties.
Could use some help on the addition of properties.
I took a look at mysqli, but the properties there also had a corresponding
procedural syntax, so wasnt sur
I like the idea of using function.ext-name.func-name. It seems straight
forward and sounds like a faster solution.
It figures it had to be this extenion to cause all the problems.
For now should I just leave the IDs and s as they currently are?
Rob
From: Wez Furlong
> I'm not sure that hitting
--Wez.
> -Original Message-
> From: Nuno Lopes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 08 May 2004 12:19
> To: Wez Furlong; 'Derick Rethans'
> Cc: 'Rob Richards'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DOC] dom docs first attempt
>
> > Can we come up with a
> Can we come up with a more precise naming scheme for ID attributes then?
>
> Something like function.ext-name.func-name; we can still retain (and
> prefer) the current scheme, but use this one when we have a collision.
>
> This should be reasonably simple to hack into livedocs.
>
> --Wez.
I was
nal Message-
> From: Nuno Lopes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 08 May 2004 11:58
> To: Derick Rethans
> Cc: Rob Richards; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DOC] dom docs first attempt
>
> > On Sat, 8 May 2004, Nuno Lopes wrote:
> >
> > > > The re
> On Sat, 8 May 2004, Nuno Lopes wrote:
>
> > > The reason why I went with link is due to having to append the "dom-"
to
> > the
> > > ids. I had origionally used , but the it wouldnt
map
> > to
> > > the ids. And I was a bit worried about the livedocs, but there is no
other
> > > way due to the do
On Sat, 8 May 2004, Nuno Lopes wrote:
> > The reason why I went with link is due to having to append the "dom-" to
> the
> > ids. I had origionally used , but the it wouldnt map
> to
> > the ids. And I was a bit worried about the livedocs, but there is no other
> > way due to the domxml functions.
> The reason why I went with link is due to having to append the "dom-" to
the
> ids. I had origionally used , but the it wouldnt map
to
> the ids. And I was a bit worried about the livedocs, but there is no other
> way due to the domxml functions. So how should the links actually be done?
You sh
On Fri, 7 May 2004, Rob Richards wrote:
> On Friday 07 May 2004 07:29 pm, Nuno Lopes wrote:
> > Firstly, you are using tabs for indentation and we don't use them.
>
> So I take it this should be spaces (any particular number or does it really
> matter?
One space only.
regards,
Derick
On Friday 07 May 2004 07:29 pm, Nuno Lopes wrote:
> Firstly, you are using tabs for indentation and we don't use them.
So I take it this should be spaces (any particular number or does it really
matter?
> You shouldn't use here. Just use
> DOMDocument->createElement. The linking of functions
>
Hello Rob,
Firstly, you are using tabs for indentation and we don't use them.
" See also DOMDocument->createElement(
),"
You shouldn't use here. Just use
DOMDocument->createElement. The linking of functions is
done automatically (this was bogus in livedocs for OO funcs, like these, but
I h
12 matches
Mail list logo
