Re: [PHP-DOC] Reflection API

2004-07-10 Thread Nuno Lopes
> This is oop5 only stuff correct? It could go into the stuff that > lovchy and I are working on, with an id of oop5-reflection. In fact > I had already created a stub xml doc just for reflection Oh, yes you're right... > I'll be commiting the stuff I have ready tonite, since others have > expres

Re: [PHP-DOC] Reflection API

2004-07-10 Thread Gabor Hojtsy
Is anybody working on this? If not, I can handle this. This is oop5 only stuff correct? It could go into the stuff that lovchy and I are working on, with an id of oop5-reflection. In fact I had already created a stub xml doc just for reflection I'll be commiting the stuff I have ready tonite, since

Re: [PHP-DOC] Reflection API

2004-07-09 Thread Curt Zirzow
* Thus wrote Nuno Lopes: > Hi, > > Is anybody working on this? If not, I can handle this. This is oop5 only stuff correct? It could go into the stuff that lovchy and I are working on, with an id of oop5-reflection. In fact I had already created a stub xml doc just for reflection I'll be commitin

Re: [PHP-DOC] Reflection API

2004-07-09 Thread Nuno Lopes
> Nuno Lopes wrote: > | Hi, > | > | Is anybody working on this? If not, I can handle this. > | > | Nuno > | > > I haven't touched it, since that day, unfortunately. > > Nor does my current workload/lifeload allow me to do more thank lurk, > presently. > > S OK! If nobody objects I'll try to incor

Re: [PHP-DOC] Reflection API

2004-07-09 Thread Sean Coates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nuno Lopes wrote: | Hi, | | Is anybody working on this? If not, I can handle this. | | Nuno | I haven't touched it, since that day, unfortunately. Nor does my current workload/lifeload allow me to do more thank lurk, presently. S -BEGIN PGP SIGNATUR

Re: [PHP-DOC] Reflection API

2004-07-09 Thread Nuno Lopes
Hi, Is anybody working on this? If not, I can handle this. Nuno - Original Message - From: "Sean Coates" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Andi Gutmans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Timm Friebe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2004 3:01 AM Subject: [PHP-DOC] Reflection

Re: [PHP-DOC] Reflection API

2004-04-04 Thread Friedhelm Betz
On Sunday 04 April 2004 14:45, Timm Friebe wrote: > [...] > > > Maybe Timm has a clever suggestion/solution where reflection to > > document? > > I'd add it under Language Reference -> Reflection API so it shows up > in the main toc. It is, after all, a core feature of PHP5. > Fine with me ;-) Fr

Re: [PHP-DOC] Reflection API

2004-04-04 Thread Timm Friebe
On Sun, 2004-04-04 at 12:15, Friedhelm Betz wrote: > On Sunday 04 April 2004 11:10, Gabor Hojtsy wrote: > > Ah, then it is better to document it as a feature and get away with > > it. Extensions documented in the manual have things like installation > > instructions, dependencies, php.ini settings,

Re: [PHP-DOC] Reflection API

2004-04-04 Thread Gabor Hojtsy
> > > Ah, then it is better to document it as a feature and get away with > > > it. Extensions documented in the manual have things like installation > > > instructions, dependencies, php.ini settings, etc. IMHO it is only > > > worth to document it as an extension, if these are needed in the > > >

Re: [PHP-DOC] Reflection API

2004-04-04 Thread Nuno Lopes
I agree, too. Nuno > > I personally would like to see this documented under Language reference > > -> classes and Objects -> Reflection API. > > So do I. > > Derick

Re: [PHP-DOC] Reflection API

2004-04-04 Thread Derick Rethans
On Sun, 4 Apr 2004, Friedhelm Betz wrote: > On Sunday 04 April 2004 11:10, Gabor Hojtsy wrote: > > Ah, then it is better to document it as a feature and get away with > > it. Extensions documented in the manual have things like installation > > instructions, dependencies, php.ini settings, etc. IM

Re: [PHP-DOC] Reflection API

2004-04-04 Thread Friedhelm Betz
On Sunday 04 April 2004 11:10, Gabor Hojtsy wrote: > Ah, then it is better to document it as a feature and get away with > it. Extensions documented in the manual have things like installation > instructions, dependencies, php.ini settings, etc. IMHO it is only > worth to document it as an extensio

Re: [PHP-DOC] Reflection API

2004-04-04 Thread Gabor Hojtsy
Ah, then it is better to document it as a feature and get away with it. Extensions documented in the manual have things like installation instructions, dependencies, php.ini settings, etc. IMHO it is only worth to document it as an extension, if these are needed in the docs. Otherwise it is a f

Re: [PHP-DOC] Reflection API

2004-04-04 Thread Andi Gutmans
It's part of the Zend Engine and always enabled (i.e. it's not really an extension but it could be separated as such logically). At 11:06 AM 4/4/2004 +0200, Gabor Hojtsy wrote: Hi Sean! I don't know how the reflection API is integrated into PHP 5. If it needs to be compiled in (the docs say it

Re: [PHP-DOC] Reflection API

2004-04-04 Thread Gabor Hojtsy
Hi Sean! I don't know how the reflection API is integrated into PHP 5. If it needs to be compiled in (the docs say it is a Zend Extension), then this is an extension, and should be documented as such. If this is compiled in regardless of parameters, then this is a feature, and then it is even