On 12 Jul, 12:31, Caroline Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Umm, that may work in the contect of bug10049, because the value of the > "customer" property is null ... but in general it's going to leak like > mad, because FREE_ZVAL just frees the container, not the contents. > You're right that this is where the problem lies though - because I'm > expecting that the refcount will be 1 at this point, and it's actually > 0, so the contents are not getting cleared. Thanks.
What's a little leaking between friends :D. Sorry, I wasn't even thinking about that. I do have a question about the change though. Is there any possibility that EG(uninitialized_zval_ptr) would ever be returned for either value, as its probably not a good idea to be playing around with that. Conceptual I wouldn't think so if you are comparing 2 SDO objects, but I'm not fluents in its internal workings to know for sure. Rob --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "phpsoa" group. To post to this group, send email to phpsoa@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
