Re: [PHPTAL] Re: PHPTAL and PHP5.3 Namespace

2012-03-28 Thread aaatoja
I totally agree with Pornel's point of view (point 4 and his website). Why switch to namespaces? Apart from that using them is really problematic every modern autoloader allows us to load classes in PSR-0, PEAR and include_path convention. Dnia 28 marca 2012 12:36 Kornel Lesiński napisał(a):

[PHPTAL] Re: PHPTAL and PHP5.3 Namespace

2012-03-28 Thread Kornel Lesiński
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:57:49 +0100, Mario Schroeder wrote: the Support for PHP5.3 Namespaces is even planned. Can you tell at what point this will be available? I've had an experimental namespaced version, but decided not to switch. 1. PHPTAL has prefixed classes already, so it doesn't co

Re: [PHPTAL] ZTal 1.3.0

2012-03-28 Thread Marco Pivetta
@Robert you can count on the fact that I will work on that then :D Marco Pivetta http://twitter.com/Ocramius http://marco-pivetta.com On 28 March 2012 10:07, Robert Goldsmith wrote: > Hello :) > > We won't even consider moving ZTal to ZF2 until it is released because the > developers keep c

Re: [PHPTAL] ZTal 1.3.0

2012-03-28 Thread Robert Goldsmith
Hello :) We won't even consider moving ZTal to ZF2 until it is released because the developers keep changing their mind on stuff :) Once v2 is out we will investigate the best way to integrate ZTal but, of course, everyone is welcome to work on the problem - it's an opensource project hosted on