Updates:
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium OpSys-All Effort-Medium
Toolkit-Piccolo2D.Java Component-Core Milestone-2.0 Performance
Comment #1 on issue 152 by allain.lalonde: Refactor PPath to use Path2D on
JDK 1.6+
http://code.google.com/p/piccolo2d/issues/detail?id=152
Of cour
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Owner: heuermh
Comment #2 on issue 152 by heue...@gmail.com: Refactor PPath to use Path2D
on JDK 1.6+
http://code.google.com/p/piccolo2d/issues/detail?id=152
Assigning to myself.
I wonder if we should jump straight to 1.6 for version 2.0. 1.6 is
a
Comment #3 on issue 152 by heue...@gmail.com: Refactor PPath to use Path2D
on JDK 1.6+
http://code.google.com/p/piccolo2d/issues/detail?id=152
Attaching draft implementation for review. See also issue 153.
Attachments:
issues152-153-src.zip 8.2 KB
--
Piccolo2D Developers Group: ht
Comment #4 on issue 152 by mr0...@mro.name: Refactor PPath to use Path2D on
JDK 1.6+
http://code.google.com/p/piccolo2d/issues/detail?id=152
I do agree with Chris
http://groups.google.com/group/piccolo2d-dev/msg/2944bdf8a13ebcfa
Could we do both - add the 1.6 features and still remain 1.5
Comment #5 on issue 152 by heue...@gmail.com: Refactor PPath to use Path2D
on JDK 1.6+
http://code.google.com/p/piccolo2d/issues/detail?id=152
I wonder how that might be possible . . . Path2D is a class added to the
JDK in 1.6. Perhaps we could create a dependency on that class compiled
Comment #6 on issue 152 by samrreid: Refactor PPath to use Path2D on JDK
1.6+
http://code.google.com/p/piccolo2d/issues/detail?id=152
I wonder how that might be possible . . . Path2D is a class added to the
JDK in 1.6.
As mentioned in comment 4, this could be done by dynamically checking
Comment #7 on issue 152 by heue...@gmail.com: Refactor PPath to use Path2D
on JDK 1.6+
http://code.google.com/p/piccolo2d/issues/detail?id=152
I don't see how that would work, since Path2D needs to be part of the
public API for the new PPath class.
PPath(Path2D path)
void setPath[Referenc
Comment #8 on issue 152 by mr0...@mro.name: Refactor PPath to use Path2D on
JDK 1.6+
http://code.google.com/p/piccolo2d/issues/detail?id=152
take a Shape input parameter, typecheck internally by RTTI against PPath
and throw an exception in case.
Not nice, as the type isn't formally part o
Updates:
Status: Started
Labels: -Milestone-2.0
Comment #9 on issue 152 by heue...@gmail.com: Refactor PPath to use Path2D
on JDK 1.6+
http://code.google.com/p/piccolo2d/issues/detail?id=152
I think there is a nice pattern established by the 1.6 Path2D abstract
class and con
Issue 152: Refactor PPath to use Path2D on JDK 1.6+
http://code.google.com/p/piccolo2d/issues/detail?id=152
This issue is now blocking issue 153.
See http://code.google.com/p/piccolo2d/issues/detail?id=153
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issu
Comment #10 on issue 152 by heue...@gmail.com: Refactor PPath to use Path2D
on JDK 1.6+
http://code.google.com/p/piccolo2d/issues/detail?id=152
Created a separate issue 190 to track jdk 1.6 changes to core.
In the meantime, I would like to create a separate module on trunk called
jdk16 tha
Updates:
Labels: Milestone-2.0
Comment #12 on issue 152 by heue...@gmail.com: Refactor PPath to use Path2D
on JDK 1.6+
http://code.google.com/p/piccolo2d/issues/detail?id=152
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
Piccolo2D Developers Group: http://groups.google.com/group/picco
Comment #11 on issue 152 by heue...@gmail.com: Refactor PPath to use Path2D
on JDK 1.6+
http://code.google.com/p/piccolo2d/issues/detail?id=152
$ svn commit -m "Issue 152, Issue 153 ; merging ppath-refactoring branch to
trunk, into new modules jdk16 and jdk16-examples" .
...
Transmitting f
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #13 on issue 152 by heue...@gmail.com: Refactor PPath to use Path2D
on JDK 1.6+
http://code.google.com/p/piccolo2d/issues/detail?id=152
No news is good news, marking as Fixed.
--
Piccolo2D Developers Group: http://groups.google.com/group/piccolo2d-dev?h
14 matches
Mail list logo
