Hi list,
Some of you might know me from IRC @aw-Unscramble.
I've written my first PicoLisp library, a native C binding for Nanomsg
(picolisp-nanomsg) - as an experiment for myself to learn this language.
In doing so, I ran into a few difficulties (mostly noob stuff) but
Regenaxer has been very
Nice!
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Alexander Williams
a...@unscramble.co.jp wrote:
Hi list,
Some of you might know me from IRC @aw-Unscramble.
I've written my first PicoLisp library, a native C binding for Nanomsg
(picolisp-nanomsg) - as an experiment for myself to learn this language.
Sorry in advance if you’ve already covered this issue in the past.
I’m on Solaris 10; I can build the 32-bit picolisp (3.1.9) with no problem.
Then, I go do a (cd src64; make) (which is GNU make btw); this builds the
x86-64.sunOS.base.s file via mkAsm, but it fails in the next step on gas
--64
This is great stuff. Nice writing style and very useful for me as a n00b.
If Alexander is a n00b, by his own self-profession, then I'm a
sub-sub-sub-n00b, because this is good stuff. Thanks!
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Alexander Williams a...@unscramble.co.jp
wrote:
Hi list,
Some of you
Yep.
Definitely interesting.
On 03/03/15 18:50, Joe Bogner wrote:
Nicely done. Thanks for sharing
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Henrik Sarvell hsarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Nice!
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Alexander Williams
a...@unscramble.co.jp wrote:
Hi list,
Some of you
From: Alexander Williams
[...]
I also wrote a tutorial explaining the code, to help other
newbies understand some useful features of PicoLisp:
https://github.com/aw/picolisp-nanomsg/blob/master/EXPLAIN.md
This is great, Alexander!
I really like this part:
(setq Result (12 104 101
Awesome!
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Jakob Eriksson ja...@aurorasystems.eu
wrote:
Yep.
Definitely interesting.
On 03/03/15 18:50, Joe Bogner wrote:
Nicely done. Thanks for sharing
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Henrik Sarvell hsarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
Nice!
On Tue,
Duh! That's it! And it even says x86 in the name!!! (e.g.
`x86-64.sunOs.tgz`) I hereby turn in any computing creds I've garnered over
the years to be thrown into burning inferno where they belong, and I'll go
live in a box down my the river. :) Thanks!
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Jakob
down *by* the river. (I can't even get *that* right.) Cheers!
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Rick Hanson cryptor...@gmail.com wrote:
Duh! That's it! And it even says x86 in the name!!! (e.g.
`x86-64.sunOs.tgz`) I hereby turn in any computing creds I've garnered over
the years to be
You are not by any chance on a Sparc platform?
On 03/03/15 20:57, Rick Hanson wrote:
Sorry in advance if you’ve already covered this issue in the past.
I’m on Solaris 10; I can build the 32-bit picolisp (3.1.9) with no problem.
Then, I go do a (cd src64; make) (which is GNU make btw);
Thanks Dave.
That looks painful, but I look forward to seeing your implementation.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Loyall, David david.loy...@nebraska.gov
wrote:
From: Alexander Williams
[...]
I also wrote a tutorial explaining the code, to help other
newbies understand some useful
Hi Rick,
All, does this mean that picoLisp64 cannot be built on a Solaris 10 sparc64
box?
Unfortunately yes. I should write the sparc9 support into src64/arch/,
which I have in my to-do list since several years. But it is a lot of
work for probably too few use cases.
And I still did not
Thank you all for your nice comments.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 7:58 PM, Michel Pelletier pelletier.mic...@gmail.com
wrote:
Awesome!
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Jakob Eriksson ja...@aurorasystems.eu
wrote:
Yep.
Definitely interesting.
On 03/03/15 18:50, Joe Bogner wrote:
Nicely
At this time, that's true. That said, it's not a herculean effort
apparently, to port it, given that
(correct me Alex or other if I'm wrong)
Solaris uses ELF.
Uses gas (not sure if it matters)
You or the person doing the porting knows Sparc assembler.
But of course not simple to do either...
Hi Jakob,
At this time, that's true. That said, it's not a herculean effort
apparently, to port it, given that
(correct me Alex or other if I'm wrong)
Solaris uses ELF.
Uses gas (not sure if it matters)
That's true, and this is good.
You or the person doing the porting knows Sparc
All, does this mean that picoLisp64 cannot be built on a Solaris 10 sparc64
box? (That's what I have.) If not, no worries; I can, and will be happy
to, still use picoLisp32 there. Thanks!
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 5:01 PM, Rick Hanson cryptor...@gmail.com wrote:
down *by* the river. (I can't
17 matches
Mail list logo
