On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 02:35:09AM +0100, pd wrote:
> sorry, I accidentally sent an incomplete message, here's the complete one
> ...
> >>
> >> BTW, I thought again about the terminology of "list" versus "cons pairs"
> >> and
> >> plain "cells". "list" is a rather unprecise term, I feel it is not
>
sorry, I accidentally sent an incomplete message, here's the complete one
On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 1:51 AM, pd wrote:
> Thanks again for your explanations Alex, still some comments...
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Alexander Burger
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> BTW, I thought again about the termino
Thanks again for your explanations Alex, still some comments...
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Alexander Burger
wrote:
>
>
> BTW, I thought again about the terminology of "list" versus "cons pairs"
> and
> plain "cells". "list" is a rather unprecise term, I feel it is not limited
> to "a
> cha
Hi Dean,
> (de fltr (Buf Ln)
>(setq New_buf (mapcar '((Ele) (pack (tail (- (length Ln)) (chop Ele
> (filter '((Ele) (pre? Ln Ele)) Buf
> ...
> #: (fltr '(aa ab) 'ab)
> #-> (NIL)
You can use 'extract' to get exactly the results you need:
(de fltr (Buf Ln)
(let N (inc (l
re my last post/thread
I don't want to waste anyone's time so please hold fire...
I've split the filtering and chopping in two and even the filtered member
LIst is disappearing
(as a result of just filtering (when it shouldn't)
so the problem doesn't look like it's to do with chopping the values do
I've got this filtering function
(de fltr (Buf Ln)
(setq New_buf (mapcar '((Ele) (pack (tail (- (length Ln)) (chop Ele
(filter '((Ele) (pre? Ln Ele)) Buf
If any element 'Ele' of Buf starts with Ln it get's put into New_buf
but not before the the Ln part is chopped off the
Hello =?utf-8?B?0JLQuNC60YLQvtGA?= :-)
You are now subscribed
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
Hi Alex
That's great...thank you very much.
Best Regards
Dean
On 27 January 2017 at 06:53, Alexander Burger wrote:
> Hi Dean,
>
> > i.e. I'm calling m1 from m2 using the same syntax as calling methods
> > externallybut just replacing *Obj with This.
>
> Yes, that's fine.
>
> > No problem if