Oh, I see! Thanks!
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 1:45 PM Alexander Burger wrote:
> Hi Bruno,
>
> > (be vertical (line (point @X @Y) (point @X @Z)))
> > (be horizontal (line (point @X @Y) (point @Z @Y)))
> >
> > and the query:
> > (? (vertical line (point 1 2) (point 1 3)))
>
> Yes, OK, but then I would
Hi Bruno,
> (be vertical (line (point @X @Y) (point @X @Z)))
> (be horizontal (line (point @X @Y) (point @Z @Y)))
>
> and the query:
> (? (vertical line (point 1 2) (point 1 3)))
Yes, OK, but then I would rather go with:
(be vertical ((line (point @X @Y1) (point @X @Y2
(be horizontal
oh yeah, the pilog definitions! sorry, here they are:
(be vertical (line (point @X @Y) (point @X @Z)))
(be horizontal (line (point @X @Y) (point @Z @Y)))
and the query:
(? (vertical line (point 1 2) (point 1 3)))
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018, 01:20 Alexander Burger wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 12:2
Indeed a shortcoming of WSL.
WSL works kind of OK after the april 2018 update. But calls to specific
native Linux system routines often yield strange results.
Also the output of standard Linux commands in WSL is often plain useless or
very limited.
Maybe this will improve in the near future :)
UNSUBSCRIBE