On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 10:19 PM Alexander Burger <a...@software-lab.de> wrote:
> Hi pd, > > > They're are not intended to be right implementations, too bad for that > ;-) > > No no, I did not say that :) > :) ok but *I* say that, it's really not a code to show, only intended to show output > Right. The point is that FEXPRs allow you to write flow control in a way > not > possible with EXPRs. > exactly, > OK. But please don't mix up the issue with side effects. They have nothing > to do > with FEXPRs. > that's true, you can code for side-effects using fexprs or exprs. I simply said I prefer to code not using side-effects (even when sometimes are needed or the better solution) > > And in most cases you can get both (beauty and performance). > > touché! ;-) regards
