Alex, Tomas, Axel (and all other picolisp coders out there),
Another newbie question here, this time using (symbols) inside a function.
The intention behind the code (see below) is pretty simple. (mk) will
create a new namespace (well, a new symbol table), and (dset) should
set a variable in a
Hi Imran,
> The intention behind the code (see below) is pretty simple. (mk) will
> create a new namespace (well, a new symbol table), and (dset) should
> set a variable in a specified namespace.
For one thing, you can easily set a variable in another namespace with:
(setq Dc~k1 123)
This wo
Thanks for responding Alex.
As you know, I'm just trying out picolisp in my spare time (hence my slow
responses on this list, sorry about that). To put some context to these
questions, I thought that using seperate namespaces to simulate a key/value
dictionary/hash-table would be a nice idea to pl
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 05:53:11 -0800
Imran Rafique wrote:
> Thanks for responding Alex.
>
> As you know, I'm just trying out picolisp in my spare time (hence my
> slow responses on this list, sorry about that). To put some context
> to these questions, I thought that using seperate namespaces to
>
Hi Imran,
> As you know, I'm just trying out picolisp in my spare time (hence my slow
> responses on this list, sorry about that). To put some context to these
That's perfect. No hurry :)
I also want to spend more time concentrating on project work.
> questions, I thought that using seperate n
Jose & Alex,
Please excuse my rudeness in not replying sooner (on business, then Yosemite
trip). Thanks for the pointers on idx trees.
--
Regards,
Imran Rafique
2012/2/1 José Romero :
> Why not use a 'idx tree then? http://software-lab.de/doc/refI.html#idx
>
>
