Re: Advice on learning the picolisp asm?

Hi Bruno, > the assembly part of pico is still too big for me to chew on, but I'll keep > my eye on it. After all, part of the allure of the language is that I might > be able to understand the Entire Thing someday. Exactly! :) ♪♫ Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE:

Re: Advice on learning the picolisp asm?

Thanks for the advice guys. I hadn't even thought of checking the documentation that actually *came* with the language. I've realised that the assembly part of pico is still too big for me to chew on, but I'll keep my eye on it. After all, part of the allure of the language is that I might be able

Re: Advice on learning the picolisp asm?

On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 01:49:28PM +0100, Joh-Tob Schäg wrote: > I think if Regenaxer adds a new function the function pointer and thereby > the binary(assembly code) becomes invalid. You misunderstood the question. > > On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 12:28:06AM -0500, Bruno Franco wrote: > > > I don't

Re: Advice on learning the picolisp asm?

I think if Regenaxer adds a new function the function pointer and thereby the binary(assembly code) becomes invalid. Am 31.12.2016 13:17 schrieb "Alexander Burger" : > On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 12:28:06AM -0500, Bruno Franco wrote: > > I don't really know any asm, but since

Re: Advice on learning the picolisp asm?

On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 09:11:37AM +0100, Joh-Tob Schäg wrote: > As far as i know the picolisp assembler can change if now functions are > added to the machine in abway to invalidates all asm. But not sure. If you Uh? What changes? Can you be more clear? -- UNSUBSCRIBE:

Re: Advice on learning the picolisp asm?

On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 12:28:06AM -0500, Bruno Franco wrote: > I don't really know any asm, but since the asm code for the picolisp > functions is just a (vi 'function) away, I feel tempted to try. > > I've found some advice on learning asm in general, but is there > anything unique of the one